Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
69
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 69 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 40 40 56 72
1440p QHD 52 54 76 96
1080p Full HD 64 72 91 120

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 72
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 High 40
3840x2160 Ultra 40
2560x1440 Low 96
2560x1440 Medium 76
2560x1440 High 54
2560x1440 Ultra 52
1920x1080 Low 120
1920x1080 Medium 91
1920x1080 High 72
1920x1080 Ultra 64

Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, In-Depth Analysis

Microsoft Flight Simulator is a uniquely demanding title, and the combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 produces a dataset that clearly illustrates where the performance boundaries lie. The measured results show a system that is capable of delivering smooth, playable frame rates across most settings, but with significant variation depending on the resolution and preset chosen. The data indicates that this pairing is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate 1080p play, while 4K Ultra demands are a step too far for the GPU to handle at playable speeds.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a predictable but pronounced performance drop as resolution increases, underscoring the RTX 4060's role as the primary bottleneck in this configuration. At 1080p with High settings, the system achieves an average of 71.7 FPS. Moving to 1440p at the same settings, the average falls to 53.8 FPS, a decline of approximately 24.9%. The jump to 4K (3840x2160) at High settings brings the average down to 40.4 FPS, which is a 43.6% reduction from the 1080p result.

This scaling pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is much steeper than what would be seen if the CPU were the limiting factor, as the pixel fill rate demand on the GPU quadruples while the CPU workload remains relatively constant. The data suggests that the Ryzen 7 5700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is more than capable of feeding the RTX 4060 at lower resolutions, but the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 128-bit memory interface are the constraints that dictate performance as resolution climbs.

The trend holds across all settings, but the magnitude of the drop varies. At Low settings, the system produces 119.8 FPS at 1080p, 95.8 FPS at 1440p, and 72 FPS at 4K. The relative consistency here, with a 39.9% drop from 1080p to 4K, suggests that even at the lowest visual fidelity, the GPU is still the dominant factor. The data clearly points to the RTX 4060 being the limiting component in this build for Microsoft Flight Simulator, regardless of the quality preset.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 63.7 at 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 23181, which places it 0.7% ahead of the Intel Arc B580 and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon 760M. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6600M by 0.6% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti by 0.7%.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700X a bottleneck for the RTX 4060 in this game?

A: The benchmark data indicates that the GPU is the limiting component. The substantial FPS drops as resolution increases, from 53.8 FPS at 1440p High to 40.4 FPS at 4K High, demonstrate that the RTX 4060's rendering capabilities are the primary constraint, not the CPU.

Q: What performance level does the 4K Ultra preset offer?

A: The 4K (3840x2160) Ultra preset yields an average FPS of 40.1, which is the lowest measured result in the dataset and likely below the threshold for a consistently smooth experience.

Q: How much faster is the 1080p Low preset compared to the 1080p Ultra preset?

A: The Low preset at 1080p achieves an average of 119.8 FPS, which is 88.1% higher than the 63.7 FPS average of the Ultra preset at the same resolution.

Q: What is the performance ranking of this specific CPU+GPU combination in the game's database?

A: This combo is ranked 1013 out of 1795 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all possible configurations for this title.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. The card's boost clock is listed at 2460 MHz, with a base clock of 1830 MHz. These specifications directly influence the measured performance in Microsoft Flight Simulator.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for the tested settings, but the 128-bit memory bus is a clear limiting factor at higher resolutions. The game's need for large texture datasets and draw calls means that memory bandwidth becomes critical. The data shows that the RTX 4060's performance degrades significantly as resolution increases, a pattern that aligns with its bandwidth constraints. At 4K, the card averages 72 FPS on Low but only 40.4 FPS on High, indicating that the GPU is struggling to maintain the memory throughput required for higher fidelity assets.

The GPU's compute capabilities, measured by its passmark G3D score of 19545, place it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This mid-range positioning is consistent with its role as a 1080p-class card. The synthetic benchmark data shows it performing within a 1.5% margin of its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Arc B580 and AMD Radeon RX 6600M, suggesting that its real-world performance in this game is representative of its class. The card's 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is not enough to overcome the memory system's limitations at 4K, which is why the measured frame rates at that resolution are the lowest in the dataset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system's capabilities across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 119.8 FPS on Low, 91 FPS on Medium, 71.7 FPS on High, and 63.7 FPS on Ultra. This demonstrates a clear progression where each step up in settings costs a measurable amount of performance, with the largest gap being between Low and Medium (a 24.0% drop).

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 95.8 FPS on Low, 76.2 FPS on Medium, 53.8 FPS on High, and 51.8 FPS on Ultra. The performance hit from 1080p to 1440p ranges from 20.0% on Low settings to 25.0% on High settings. This consistency indicates that the GPU is scaling uniformly with pixel count, reinforcing that it is the primary bottleneck.

At 3840x2160, the results are 72 FPS on Low, 55.6 FPS on Medium, 40.4 FPS on High, and 40.1 FPS on Ultra. The gap between High and Ultra at this resolution is negligible, with only a 0.3 FPS difference. This suggests that the Ultra preset's additional demands are not being fully processed, likely due to hitting a hard limit in the GPU's memory bandwidth or compute resources. The 4K Ultra result of 40.1 FPS is the lowest in the entire dataset, confirming that this configuration is not suited for maximum fidelity at that resolution.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal experience for this system depends heavily on the target resolution. For 1080p gaming, the High preset at 71.7 FPS offers a strong balance, providing a significant visual upgrade over Medium's 91 FPS while maintaining a frame rate that is well above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 63.7 FPS is also viable, but the 11.2% performance cost over High is not justified by the marginal visual gains in a flight simulator where terrain detail is often viewed from a distance.

For 1440p, the Medium preset at 76.2 FPS appears to be the sweet spot. The High preset at 53.8 FPS is playable but may feel less fluid during fast maneuvering, while the Low preset at 95.8 FPS sacrifices too much visual quality. The Ultra preset at 51.8 FPS is the only setting that dips below 60 FPS, so it is recommended only for users who prioritize maximum fidelity over frame rate consistency.

At 4K, the data suggests that the Low preset at 72 FPS is the only truly comfortable option. The Medium preset at 55.6 FPS is borderline, and the High and Ultra presets at 40.4 and 40.1 FPS, respectively, are not recommended for a smooth experience. The negligible difference between High and Ultra at this resolution is a clear sign that the RTX 4060 is overwhelmed, so users targeting 4K should stick to Low or Medium settings to keep frame rates in a playable range.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 4600 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2460 MHz MHz
TDP 115 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 72.0
3840x2160 Medium 55.6
3840x2160 High 40.4
3840x2160 Ultra 40.1
2560x1440 Low 95.8
2560x1440 Medium 76.2
2560x1440 High 53.8
2560x1440 Ultra 51.8
1920x1080 Low 119.8
1920x1080 Medium 91.0
1920x1080 High 71.7
1920x1080 Ultra 63.7

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Ryzen 7 5700X + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RTX 4060 + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700X + RTX 4060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.