Lockdown Protocol
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 45 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 19 | 26 | 30 | 42 |
| 1440p QHD | 30 | 40 | 46 | 65 |
| 1080p Full HD | 41 | 55 | 63 | 88 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + Intel Arc B390, In-Depth Analysis
# Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + Intel Arc B390
Lockdown Protocol, the 2024 FPS from the benchmark database's measured data, scales steeply with resolution on this specific CPU-GPU pairing. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the Intel Arc B390 integrated GPU shows a clear pattern: performance is heavily constrained by the graphics side, with the CPU's substantial multi-core capabilities leaving headroom unused at higher resolutions. The data indicates a system that can handle competitive frame rates at 1080p on lower settings but falls below playable thresholds as resolution climbs, making this a configuration best suited for esports-style play rather than high-fidelity 4K sessions.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS numbers reveal a sharp drop-off as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At Low settings, average FPS falls from 88 at 1080p to 65 at 1440p, then plummets to 42 at 4K. That represents a 26% reduction going from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 35% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The scaling is consistent but steep, indicating the Intel Arc B390's integrated graphics become the limiting factor well before the CPU's potential is exhausted.
The pattern repeats across all settings presets. Medium settings show 63 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 46 at 1440p (a 27% decline) and further to 30 at 4K (a 35% decline from 1440p). High settings follow suit: 55 FPS at 1080p, 40 at 1440p, and 26 at 4K. Ultra settings, which start at just 41 FPS at 1080p, fall to 30 at 1440p and 19 at 4K. The consistent proportional drops across presets suggest the rendering pipeline is uniformly stressed by pixel count, with no single setting causing a disproportionate penalty.
The frame pacing data for Medium settings reinforces this interpretation. At 1080p, the measured range spans 53 to 72 FPS, a spread of 19 frames. At 1440p, the range tightens to 39-53 FPS, and at 4K it narrows further to 25-34 FPS. As resolution rises, both the average and the variance shrink, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario where the rendering unit is saturated and frame delivery becomes more regular but slower. The Intel Arc B390's 60.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 120.0 GTexel/s texture rate are simply insufficient to feed higher-resolution displays at high frame rates.
This scaling behavior points to a system where the CPU's role diminishes as resolution grows. The Core Ultra 7 265K, with its 20 cores and 20 threads, is not the bottleneck at any measured resolution — the data shows frame rates collapsing in a manner consistent with integrated graphics limits. For users targeting 4K, the 42 FPS at Low settings is the best achievable result in the measured set, which falls short of smooth gameplay. At 1080p, however, the story changes dramatically, with even High settings delivering 55 FPS and Low reaching 88 FPS.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor built on Arrow Lake architecture and the 3 nm process. Its base clock of 3.90 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz provide substantial single-threaded capability, as reflected in benchmark scores like 2,020 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2,713 in Geekbench single-core. The processor's 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB L2 per core contribute to its 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70,879.
In Lockdown Protocol, the CPU's multi-threaded strength appears underutilized. The 20-core configuration delivers 35,850 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 20,918 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, but the game's measured frame rates at 4K Ultra (19 FPS) suggest the render thread is not the constraint. Instead, the integrated GPU's limited shading units (1,536) and 24 ROPs create a bottleneck that no amount of CPU compute can bypass. The CPU's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth and dual-channel DDR5 support are adequate for feeding the GPU, but the system-shared memory architecture means the GPU competes with CPU workloads for the same bandwidth pool.
The nearest rivals to the Core Ultra 7 265K in aggregate benchmark performance include the Intel Xeon 6511P (average score 71,051, delta -0.2%), the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71,370, delta -0.7%), the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70,163, delta +1%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (69,996, delta +1.3%). These tight deltas — all within 1.3 percentage points — indicate the 265K sits in a competitive performance class, yet none of these rivals would change the Lockdown Protocol outcome because the GPU remains the limiting factor across the board.
The CPU's integrated graphics, branded as Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, is the only GPU in this configuration, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,482 places it in the 9th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest GPU rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1,463, delta +1.3%), GeForce 800M (1,460, delta +1.5%), GT 625 OEM (1,446, delta +2.5%), and GT 710 (1,443, delta +2.7%). This context is crucial: the GPU's performance class is far below what modern FPS titles typically require, and the CPU's 94th percentile ranking cannot compensate.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated GPU based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on Intel's 3 nm process with the Panther Lake chip. Its base clock of 300 MHz boosts to 2,500 MHz, and it relies on system-shared memory with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." The GPU's 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs deliver 7.680 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 15.36 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio), along with 12 ray tracing cores. The 60.00 GPixel/s pixel fill rate and 120.0 GTexel/s texture fill rate are the physical limits that explain the measured frame rates.
Lockdown Protocol's measured performance directly reflects these specifications. At 1080p Low, the 88 FPS average is achievable because the pixel load is modest — roughly 2 million pixels per frame at that resolution. At 4K, the pixel count quadruples to over 8 million, and the 42 FPS at Low settings shows the GPU's fill rate struggling to keep pace. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,482, which places the B390 in the 9th percentile, corroborates this: it is a GPU designed for basic display output, not high-end gaming.
The VRAM situation is unique: the B390 has no dedicated memory, using "System Shared" capacity, type, and bus width. This means the DDR5 system memory, with its 102.4 GB/s theoretical bandwidth from the CPU's dual-channel controller, must serve both CPU and GPU workloads. In Lockdown Protocol, the game's texture streaming and geometry processing contend with CPU tasks for the same bandwidth, potentially exacerbating frame rate drops at higher resolutions where memory pressure increases. The "System Dependent" bandwidth figure makes it difficult to predict exact performance without knowing the specific memory configuration.
The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility are modern, but raw compute is what matters in this FPS. The 19 FPS at 4K Ultra represents the worst-case scenario, where the GPU's 24 ROPs are overwhelmed by pixel shading demands. The 42 FPS at 4K Low shows that reducing settings helps, but the B390's 9th percentile ranking means even best-case scenarios at high resolution fall short of playable standards for most users.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the configuration delivers its strongest results. Low settings average 88 FPS, which is competitive for fast-paced FPS gameplay. Medium settings average 63 FPS with a measured range of 53-72 FPS, providing a solid baseline. High settings average 55 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 41 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 47 FPS, representing a 53% reduction in performance when maximizing visual quality.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance declines noticeably. Low settings average 65 FPS, Medium averages 46 FPS (range 39-53), High averages 40 FPS, and Ultra averages 30 FPS. The step from Low to Ultra at 1440p spans 35 FPS, a 54% drop. The Medium setting's minimum of 39 FPS approaches the threshold where frame pacing issues become noticeable, though the average remains acceptable for less demanding play.
At 3840x2160, the configuration struggles across all settings. Low averages 42 FPS, Medium averages 30 FPS (range 25-34), High averages 26 FPS, and Ultra averages 19 FPS. Only Low settings approach playability, and even then, the average sits below the 60 FPS target most FPS players prefer. The 4K Ultra result of 19 FPS is effectively a slideshow, confirming that this integrated GPU cannot handle 4K gaming under any measured preset.
The overall combo rank in Lockdown Protocol is 2,512 out of 2,828 tested combinations, placing this configuration in the bottom 11% of all CPU-GPU pairings for this game. This ranking aligns with the GPU's 9th percentile performance and reinforces that the Arc B390, despite its modern architecture, is not designed for this workload at higher resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 1080p with playable frame rates?
A: Yes, at 1080p Low settings the average FPS is 88, and Medium settings deliver 63 FPS with a range of 53-72 FPS. High settings also exceed 55 FPS, making 1080p playable on most presets, though Ultra at 41 FPS may feel less smooth.
Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K or the Intel Arc B390 the bottleneck in this game?
A: The benchmark data clearly shows the Arc B390 as the limiting component. The GPU's 9th percentile ranking and the sharp FPS drops with resolution increases indicate graphics-bound performance, while the CPU's 94th percentile ranking shows it has ample headroom.
Q: How does the Arc B390 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The B390 scores 1,482 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 1.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1,463), 1.5% ahead of the GeForce 800M (1,460), 2.5% ahead of the GT 625 OEM (1,446), and 2.7% ahead of the GT 710 (1,443). These are all low-end GPUs, confirming the B390's entry-level positioning.
Q: What is the best resolution-to-settings combination for this configuration?
A: Based on the measured data, 1080p Low at 88 FPS is the most responsive option, while 1080p Medium at 63 FPS offers a balance of visual quality and smoothness. For 1440p, Low at 65 FPS is the only preset exceeding 60 FPS, while 4K is not recommended due to sub-45 FPS results across all settings.
Q: Does the Arc B390 have dedicated VRAM for gaming?
A: No, the B390 uses System Shared memory, meaning it draws from the same DDR5 pool as the CPU. The memory bandwidth is described as "System Dependent," so performance can vary based on the system's memory configuration, though the measured FPS data already reflects this limitation.
Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265K's performance compare to its nearest CPU rivals?
A: The 265K's average benchmark score of 70,879 is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6511P (71,051), 0.7% behind the Xeon Platinum 8270 (71,370), 1% ahead of the Core i7-14700KF (70,163), and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (69,996). These close margins indicate the 265K is competitive, but this doesn't translate to gaming gains given the GPU bottleneck.
Settings Recommendations
For players prioritizing frame rate in Lockdown Protocol, the data supports 1080p Low as the primary choice, delivering 88 FPS average — the highest measured result in the entire dataset. This preset maximizes responsiveness, which is critical for an FPS title where reaction time matters. The 1080p Medium preset at 63 FPS is a strong alternative for those wanting improved visuals without sacrificing smoothness, as the 53-72 FPS range indicates acceptable frame pacing.
At 1440p, the options are more constrained. Low settings at 65 FPS are the only preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold, making it the recommended choice for users on 1440p displays. Medium at 46 FPS and High at 40 FPS are playable but show noticeable compromise, while Ultra at 30 FPS should be avoided. For 4K users, the data offers no satisfying option — Low at 42 FPS is the best result, but even this falls below the smoothness standard for competitive play. The 4K Medium range of 25-34 FPS and the 4K Ultra 19 FPS average make those presets impractical.
The overall pattern suggests that this configuration is best utilized at 1080p with Medium settings as the sweet spot, balancing the 63 FPS average against the visual uplift from Low. If frame rate is the absolute priority, 1080p Low's 88 FPS is the clear winner. At higher resolutions, users should temper expectations: 1440p is only viable on Low, and 4K should be reserved for static scenes or non-competitive play. The GPU's 9th percentile standing and the combo's 2,512th rank out of 2,828 emphasize that this pairing is not built for high-end gaming, and the settings recommendations reflect that reality.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Intel Arc B390
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + Intel Arc B390 in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 42.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 30.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 26.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 19.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 65.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 46.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 40.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 30.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 88.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 63.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 55.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 41.0 |
Lockdown Protocol with iUltra 7 265K + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with Arc B390 + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265K + Arc B390
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.