Lockdown Protocol
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 58 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 35 | 37 | 52 |
| 1440p QHD | 37 | 54 | 57 | 85 |
| 1080p Full HD | 52 | 67 | 78 | 113 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, In-Depth Analysis
Lockdown Protocol is an FPS with a demanding rendering load, and this particular pairing—AMD Ryzen 9 7900X with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB—shows a system where the graphics card is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The measured data reveals a clear hierarchy of performance across settings, with the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth dictating playability more than the CPU's substantial 12-core, 24-thread architecture.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep, confirming that Lockdown Protocol scales heavily with pixel count. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 112.7 at 1920x1080 to 84.6 at 2560x1440, then to 52.1 at 3840x2160. That is a 53.8% reduction from 1080p to 4K, indicating the RTX 3050 4 GB is quickly overwhelmed as the render target grows. The gap between 1440p and 4K is particularly punishing—32.5 FPS lost—which suggests the GPU's 128-bit memory interface and 4 GB frame buffer become the limiting factor at 4K.
The scaling pattern changes with settings. At Ultra, the drop from 1080p (51.9) to 1440p (37.4) is a 27.9% loss, but the drop from 1440p to 4K (25.0) is another 33.2%. This consistent steep decline across all presets points to a GPU-bound scenario at every resolution above 1080p Low. The CPU, with its 5.60 GHz boost clock and 64 MB shared L3 cache, is not the constraint here; the data shows the RTX 3050 4 GB is the component that determines the ceiling. At 1080p Low, the 112.7 average suggests the CPU can feed the GPU adequately, but that headroom vanishes as resolution climbs.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, Low settings at 1080p is the only preset that delivers a definitively smooth experience, with an average of 112.7 FPS. This is 45.3 FPS higher than the next best 1080p option (Medium at 77.8), making it the clear choice for competitive play where frame rate matters most. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 34.9 FPS, a massive penalty for what is typically a modest visual gain in an FPS title.
For 1440p users, Low is again the only viable preset, yielding 84.6 FPS. Medium at 1440p drops to 56.6, which is playable but below the 60 FPS threshold many players target. High at 1440p is borderline at 54.0, and Ultra at 37.4 is too slow for a fast-paced shooter. At 4K, no preset reaches 60 FPS: Low averages 52.1, Medium 37.0, High 35.2, and Ultra 25.0. The data strongly suggests that 4K is not practical with this GPU, and even Low settings there will feel stuttery in intense firefights. The recommendation is straightforward: use Low at 1080p or 1440p, and avoid 4K entirely unless you accept sub-60 FPS.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 part with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Its benchmark scores are strong—a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 43695 and a single-core score of 6168—placing it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. This is a processor built for heavy multi-threaded workloads, and in Lockdown Protocol, its role is to feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck.
The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combo. At 1080p Low, the 112.7 FPS average is likely near the CPU's practical limit for this game's engine, but at higher resolutions the FPS drops far below that, proving the GPU is the constraint. The 7900X's 64 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (83.2 GB/s bandwidth) provide ample headroom for the RTX 3050 4 GB. Compared to its nearest rivals, the 7900X's average benchmark score of 50556 is just 0.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (50598), and 0.8% behind the Intel Core i9-13980HX (50944). These deltas are negligible for gaming, meaning any of these CPUs would perform nearly identically in Lockdown Protocol at the same GPU settings.
The 12 cores and 24 threads are more than sufficient for an FPS title, which typically scales well up to 8 threads. The 7900X's 3DMark 8-thread score of 7798 and max-thread score of 12536 indicate strong multi-core scaling, but this game is unlikely to leverage all 24 threads. The single-thread performance, reflected in the 3DMark single-thread score of 1093 and Geekbench single-core score of 2952, is what matters for frame pacing, and it is excellent.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K?
A: The measured data shows no. At 4K, the best average FPS is 52.1 on Low settings, with Medium at 37.0, High at 35.2, and Ultra at 25.0. None of these reach the 60 FPS target for smooth play.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p?
A: Low settings at 1080p delivers 112.7 FPS, which is 34.9 FPS higher than Medium (77.8) and 44.9 FPS higher than Ultra (51.9). Low is the only preset that provides a significant frame rate cushion.
Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X holding back the RTX 3050 4 GB?
A: No. The CPU's benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 43695 and a single-core score of 6168, are far above what this GPU needs. The FPS drops at higher resolutions are consistent with GPU limitations, not CPU bottlenecks.
Q: How does the 7900X compare to its closest rivals?
A: The 7900X's average benchmark score is 50556, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (50598), 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (50738), and 0.8% lower than the Intel Core i9-13980HX (50944). These differences are negligible for gaming.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?
A: Low at 1440p averages 84.6 FPS, while Ultra averages 37.4 FPS. That is a 47.2 FPS penalty for maxing out settings, which is a steep trade-off for visual fidelity.
Q: Does the RTX 3050 4 GB's memory capacity affect performance?
A: The 4 GB GDDR6 frame buffer with a 128-bit bus and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is likely the reason 4K performance is so poor. The steep FPS drop from 1440p to 4K across all settings indicates the VRAM and bandwidth are exhausted at higher resolutions.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is an Ampere-based card with 2048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Its boost clock is 1740 MHz, and it has 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores. The memory configuration—4 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth—is the defining weakness. The card's 7.127 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, and its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it squarely in the mid-range.
In Lockdown Protocol, the GPU's role is dominant. The measured FPS across all resolutions and settings shows a clear pattern: the card struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 1440p and above. At 1080p, it can deliver 112.7 FPS on Low, but that drops to 77.8 on Medium, 67.4 on High, and 51.9 on Ultra. This 60.8 FPS spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p indicates that the card's shading units are adequate but its memory bandwidth and capacity limit high-detail performance.
The 4 GB VRAM is particularly problematic. At 4K, even Low settings (52.1 FPS) are not smooth, and the jump to Medium (37.0) causes a 15.1 FPS drop, suggesting the frame buffer is being exceeded. The card's 90 W TDP and dual-slot design are modest, but the 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is simply too low for 4K textures and geometry in a modern FPS. The data shows that the RTX 3050 4 GB is best treated as a 1080p card, with 1440p only viable on Low settings. Its end-of-life production status and 250 W suggested PSU requirement make it a legacy option rather than a future-proof choice.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the card delivers its best results. Low settings average 112.7 FPS, which is the highest measured value in the entire dataset. Medium follows at 77.8 FPS, a significant 34.9 FPS drop. High settings average 67.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 51.9 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 60.8 FPS, showing that this resolution is where the GPU has the most headroom.
At 2560x1440, performance degrades noticeably. Low settings average 84.6 FPS, which is still smooth but 28.1 FPS lower than 1080p Low. Medium drops to 56.6 FPS, High to 54.0 FPS, and Ultra to 37.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 1440p is 28.0 FPS, nearly identical to the resolution penalty, indicating the GPU is now memory-constrained.
At 3840x2160, the card is overwhelmed. Low settings average 52.1 FPS, Medium 37.0 FPS, High 35.2 FPS, and Ultra 25.0 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 27.1 FPS, but even the best case is below 60 FPS. The data shows a clear pattern: each resolution step up halves the effective performance headroom, and 4K is simply not viable for this GPU in Lockdown Protocol. The combo rank of 1507 out of 1637 confirms this is a below-average pairing for this game, driven entirely by the GPU's limitations.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 52.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 37.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 35.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 25.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 84.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 56.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 54.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 37.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 112.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 77.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 67.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 51.9 |
Lockdown Protocol with RTX 3050 4 GB + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 7900X + RTX 3050 4 GB
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.