Lockdown Protocol
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 58 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 33 | 38 | 53 |
| 1440p QHD | 38 | 51 | 59 | 82 |
| 1080p Full HD | 52 | 70 | 80 | 112 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, In-Depth Analysis
Lockdown Protocol places the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB combination in a challenging position. The benchmark data shows a system that can deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with adjusted settings, but one that is heavily constrained by the graphics card at higher resolutions. The measured results indicate a clear hierarchy where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, while the CPU's 14 cores and 5.10 GHz boost clock provide sufficient headroom for the game's logic. This analysis walks through the measured FPS data, component roles, and ranking to provide a complete picture of this combo's capability.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reveals a steep performance curve that is typical of a GPU-limited scenario. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 112 FPS at 1080p to 82 FPS at 1440p, representing a 27% reduction, and then further down to 53 FPS at 4K, which is a 53% drop from the 1080p baseline. This scaling pattern indicates that the RTX 3050 4 GB is the limiting factor, as the pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K while the frame rate does not even halve at Low settings, suggesting some CPU involvement at the lower resolution.
At Medium settings, the average FPS at 1080p is 80, dropping to 59 at 1440p (a 26% decrease) and then to 38 at 4K (a 53% decrease from 1080p). The consistency of these percentage drops across Low and Medium presets confirms that the GPU's shading units and memory bandwidth are the dominant constraints. The RTX 3050 4 GB has a 128-bit memory bus and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth, which becomes increasingly insufficient as resolution climbs, forcing the GPU to work harder per frame.
High settings show a similar pattern: 70 FPS at 1080p, 51 FPS at 1440p (27% drop), and 33 FPS at 4K (53% drop). Ultra settings are the most demanding, with 52 FPS at 1080p, 38 FPS at 1440p (27% drop), and 25 FPS at 4K (52% drop). The uniformity of these percentage reductions across all four presets strongly suggests that the limiting component is the GPU, not the CPU. The Core Ultra 5 245, with its 14 cores and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, is unlikely to be the bottleneck at any resolution, as Lockdown Protocol's frame generation relies more on graphics throughput than on multi-threaded CPU processing.
The data also shows that the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution decreases. At 4K, the difference between Low (53 FPS) and Ultra (25 FPS) is 28 FPS. At 1080p, the difference between Low (112 FPS) and Ultra (52 FPS) is 60 FPS. This widening gap at lower resolutions indicates that the CPU can feed frames faster when the GPU is less burdened, but at 4K, the GPU's limitations cap the maximum achievable frame rate regardless of settings. The min FPS values at Medium settings—32 FPS at 4K, 50 FPS at 1440p, and 68 FPS at 1080p—provide additional evidence of GPU-bound behavior, as the minimums scale with resolution similarly to the averages.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play Lockdown Protocol with this combo?
A: The data indicates 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the combo consistently exceeds 60 FPS. At Low settings, the average is 112 FPS, and at Medium settings, it is 80 FPS. At 1440p, even Low settings only achieve 82 FPS, while 4K at any setting falls below 53 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 3050 4 GB's VRAM affect performance at 4K?
A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus width. At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 25 at Ultra to 53 at Low. The relatively small memory size and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely contributors to the steep frame rate drops at higher resolutions, as the GPU struggles to manage the increased texture and geometry data.
Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 sufficient for this game?
A: The CPU's benchmark scores suggest it has ample headroom. It scores 32924 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4648 in single-core, ranking in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The measured FPS data shows performance scaling that is consistent with GPU limitation, not CPU limitation, particularly at higher resolutions.
Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, Low settings yield an average of 112 FPS, while Ultra settings yield 52 FPS. This 60 FPS difference represents a 54% reduction in performance when moving from the lowest to the highest preset, indicating that Ultra settings are significantly more demanding on the GPU.
Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 2492 out of 2828 tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the lower percentile of tested systems, which is consistent with the RTX 3050 4 GB's position in the 50th percentile of all GPUs and the CPU's 90th percentile ranking.
Q: Does the game run smoothly at Medium settings?
A: At 1080p, Medium settings produce an average of 80 FPS with a min FPS of 68, which indicates smooth gameplay. At 1440p, the average drops to 59 FPS with a min of 50 FPS, which is playable but less consistent. At 4K, the average is 38 FPS with a min of 32 FPS, which may feel stuttery in fast-paced FPS action.
Settings Recommendations
For the best experience with this hardware, the data points to 1920x1080 resolution as the primary target. At this resolution, Medium settings deliver an average of 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS, providing a smooth and responsive experience for an FPS title. The 68 FPS minimum is above the 60 FPS threshold that most players consider acceptable, and the 92 FPS maximum shows there is headroom for occasional spikes. Low settings at 1080p push the average to 112 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play, but the visual quality reduction may not be worth the extra 32 FPS over Medium.
At 1440p, the best option is Low settings, which achieve 82 FPS on average. However, this is only 2 FPS higher than Medium settings at 1080p, and the visual fidelity difference between 1440p Low and 1080p Medium is likely to be minimal. High settings at 1440p drop to 51 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS target and may introduce noticeable stutter in fast-moving scenes. The data suggests that 1440p should be avoided unless the user prioritizes resolution over frame rate, as even Low settings cannot consistently maintain 60 FPS in all scenarios.
At 4K, the measured frame rates are below 53 FPS even at Low settings, with Ultra settings dropping to 25 FPS. None of the 4K presets provide a playable experience for an FPS game, as the frame pacing and minimum FPS values would likely lead to a poor experience. The RTX 3050 4 GB is simply not equipped for 4K gaming in this title, regardless of the CPU's capabilities. The recommended configuration is 1080p with Medium settings, as it balances visual quality and performance, yielding an average of 80 FPS and a minimum of 68 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best performance. Low settings produce an average of 112 FPS, which is the highest measured value across all configurations. Medium settings yield 80 FPS average with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS, providing the most consistent experience. High settings drop to 70 FPS average, still above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings fall to 52 FPS average, which is below the ideal threshold for competitive FPS play but may be acceptable for casual gaming.
At 2560x1440, the performance degrades noticeably. Low settings achieve 82 FPS average, which is still respectable but represents a 27% drop from 1080p Low. Medium settings yield 59 FPS average with a minimum of 50 FPS and a maximum of 67 FPS, indicating that the frame rate dips below 60 FPS during demanding scenes. High settings drop to 51 FPS average, and Ultra settings fall to 38 FPS average. The 1440p data shows that only Low settings can maintain an average above 60 FPS, and even then, the minimum FPS is not recorded, so stutters may occur.
At 3840x2160, the combo struggles across all settings. Low settings achieve 53 FPS average, which is the only 4K preset above 50 FPS. Medium settings yield 38 FPS average with a minimum of 32 FPS and a maximum of 43 FPS, indicating significant frame rate volatility. High settings drop to 33 FPS average, and Ultra settings fall to 25 FPS average. The 4K data clearly shows that this GPU cannot handle the resolution, with even the lowest settings failing to reach 60 FPS.
The progression from 1080p to 4K at each setting level shows a consistent pattern of performance loss. For Low settings, the drop from 112 to 82 to 53 FPS represents a 53% total reduction from 1080p to 4K. For Medium settings, the drop from 80 to 59 to 38 FPS represents a 53% reduction. For High settings, the drop from 70 to 51 to 33 FPS represents a 53% reduction. For Ultra settings, the drop from 52 to 38 to 25 FPS represents a 52% reduction. This uniformity across all presets reinforces the conclusion that the GPU is the limiting factor at every resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo ranks 2492 out of 2828 tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the lower 12th percentile of all tested systems. This ranking is notably lower than what the CPU alone would suggest, as the Core Ultra 5 245 sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 48995. The disparity between the CPU's high ranking and the combo's low ranking highlights the extent to which the RTX 3050 4 GB drags down overall performance.
The RTX 3050 4 GB sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, which is a median position. However, in Lockdown Protocol, the combination of this GPU with the high-end CPU does not translate to a median ranking. The 4 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely insufficient for the game's requirements at higher settings, as evidenced by the sub-60 FPS averages at 1440p and 4K. The combo's rank of 2492 suggests that most other tested combinations, even those with weaker CPUs but stronger GPUs, achieve better frame rates in this game.
The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance ceiling. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has an average score of 49196, which is 0.4% lower than the Core Ultra 5 245. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 averages 49228, 0.5% lower. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H averages 48698, 0.6% higher, and the Intel Core i5-14600K averages 48618, 0.8% higher. These differences are minimal, indicating that the CPU is not the differentiator in this combo's ranking. The GPU's limitations are the primary reason for the low position relative to other tested systems.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 features 14 cores and 14 threads, which is an unusual configuration for a desktop CPU, as it lacks hyper-threading. The base clock is 3.50 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.10 GHz, providing strong single-thread performance when needed. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which helps reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data.
In Lockdown Protocol, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU. The measured FPS scaling across resolutions is nearly uniform, which indicates that the CPU is not the bottleneck at any point. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 and single-core score of 4648 demonstrate robust computational power, and the PassMark single-thread score of 4394 confirms that the CPU can handle game logic and physics calculations without issue.
The CPU's 14 threads are likely sufficient for Lockdown Protocol's multi-threaded workloads, even though the game is primarily GPU-bound in this configuration. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps keep frequently used game data close to the cores, reducing the need to access system memory. The CPU's memory support for DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data can flow to the GPU without creating a bottleneck. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide ample bandwidth for the GPU, though the RTX 3050 4 GB uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is still sufficient for this workload.
The CPU's integrated graphics, Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, are not used in this configuration, as the discrete GPU handles all rendering. The 90th percentile ranking of the CPU indicates that it outperforms 90% of all CPUs in benchmark tests, making it a capable partner for most gaming workloads. However, in this specific combo, the CPU's potential is unrealized due to the GPU's limitations.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is the primary determinant of this combo's performance in Lockdown Protocol. The GPU features 2048 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, with 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores. The base clock is 1545 MHz, and the boost clock is 1740 MHz, providing a modest level of raw compute power at 7.127 TFLOPS for FP32 operations.
The GPU's memory configuration is a critical limitation. With only 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, the bandwidth is 192.0 GB/s. This is low by modern standards, and it becomes a significant constraint at higher resolutions where the frame buffer demands increase. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU's performance drops by approximately 53% from 1080p to 4K across all settings, which is consistent with a memory-bandwidth-limited scenario.
The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it squarely in the middle of the performance spectrum. However, in Lockdown Protocol, this median position translates to poor performance at 1440p and 4K, as the game appears to be demanding on memory bandwidth and capacity. The 4 GB VRAM is likely insufficient for high-resolution textures, forcing the GPU to use slower memory access patterns or drop textures, which can cause stutters and frame rate drops.
The RTX 3050 4 GB's 90W TDP and dual-slot design indicate it is a low-power, entry-level card. The boost clock of 1740 MHz is relatively modest, and the 128-bit memory bus is narrower than many competing cards. The GPU's pixel rate of 55.68 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s provide context for its rendering capabilities, but in practice, the memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s is the limiting factor in this game.
The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with Lockdown Protocol's rendering requirements, but the hardware resources are insufficient for high-fidelity settings at higher resolutions. The measured data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 25, which is unplayable, while at 1080p Low, the average is 112 FPS, which is excellent. This wide range highlights the GPU's sensitivity to both resolution and settings, and it suggests that users must carefully tune settings to achieve their desired frame rate.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 245
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 53.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 38.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 33.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 25.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 82.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 59.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 51.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 38.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 112.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 80.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 70.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 52.0 |
Lockdown Protocol with RTX 3050 4 GB + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 245 + RTX 3050 4 GB
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.