Lockdown Protocol
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 83 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 47 | 54 | 78 |
| 1440p QHD | 58 | 72 | 81 | 116 |
| 1080p Full HD | 76 | 100 | 116 | 162 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
Lockdown Protocol’s benchmark data reveals a system that is clearly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X provides ample headroom for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 1080p. The measured FPS curves show a predictable pattern: performance scales inversely with resolution and settings, but the rate of that scaling tells you exactly where the bottleneck lies. This is a pairing that can handle competitive play at 1080p with ease but will require careful settings management for a smooth 4K experience.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data shows a steep decline as resolution increases, which is the classic signature of a GPU-limited scenario. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 100.4 FPS at 1920x1080 to 72.2 FPS at 2560x1440, a 28% reduction. Moving up to 3840x2160, the average falls further to 46.5 FPS, which represents a 54% drop from the 1080p baseline. This steep curve indicates that the RTX 3060 Ti’s rendering throughput is the primary constraint; the CPU is not holding the system back in this range.
The scaling pattern holds across all settings presets. At Low settings, the drop from 1080p to 4K is from 161.5 FPS down to 77.8 FPS. At Medium, the drop is from 116 FPS to 53.5 FPS. The consistent halving of performance between 1080p and 4K across presets confirms that pixel count, not CPU physics or draw calls, is the dominant variable. Interestingly, the gap between 1440p and 4K is larger than the gap between 1080p and 1440p in most cases, suggesting that the GPU hits a memory bandwidth or fill-rate wall as it approaches 4K.
The data suggests that for a 60 FPS target, 1440p is the practical ceiling for this combo at High settings. At 4K, you must drop to Low settings to exceed 60 FPS, which is a significant compromise. For players with 1080p monitors, the system is massively overqualified, offering frame rates well above the refresh rate of most standard displays even at Ultra settings. The scaling analysis points to a system that is balanced for 1440p gaming, with 4K requiring a willingness to turn down graphical fidelity.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU combo in Lockdown Protocol?
A: Based on the measured data, 2560x1440 is the sweet spot. At High settings, it averages 72.2 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. It also offers a significant visual upgrade over 1080p without the steep performance penalty seen at 4K.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Lockdown Protocol?
A: Yes, but with significant compromises. The data shows that at 3840x2160, only the Low preset (77.8 FPS) achieves a playable frame rate. Medium (53.5 FPS) and High (46.5 FPS) are borderline, while Ultra (35.4 FPS) is not recommended for a smooth experience.
Q: How much of a performance gain is there from High to Low settings?
A: The gain is substantial and increases with resolution. At 1080p, Low is 61% faster than High (161.5 FPS vs 100.4 FPS). At 1440p, the gain is 61% as well (116 FPS vs 72.2 FPS). At 4K, the jump is even larger, with Low being 67% faster than High (77.8 FPS vs 46.5 FPS).
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this benchmark?
A: The GPU is the clear limiting factor. The steep FPS drops when increasing resolution from 1080p to 4K are a direct indicator of GPU-bound performance. The Ryzen 7 9700X, with its high single-thread score of 4459 in Cinebench R23, is not the bottleneck in this scenario.
Q: How does this system rank against other combinations?
A: The combo ranks 1133 out of 1637 tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the lower-middle tier of the database, which is consistent with the RTX 3060 Ti being an older, end-of-life GPU (69th percentile) paired with a top-tier CPU (89th percentile).
Q: What is the difference in FPS between the Medium and High presets?
A: The difference is modest but consistent. At 1080p, Medium averages 116 FPS versus 100.4 FPS for High. At 1440p, the gap is 80.9 FPS versus 72.2 FPS. At 4K, the gap is 53.5 FPS versus 46.5 FPS. Medium offers a small FPS bump with a likely minor visual quality reduction.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the workhorse of this system, and its specifications dictate the performance envelope. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a key factor in the 4K performance drop, as the higher resolution demands more data throughput than the card can efficiently provide. The 8 GB capacity is also a potential concern for Ultra textures at 4K, though the measured data shows the card still functions.
Clock speeds are modest by modern standards, with a base of 1410 MHz and a boost of 1665 MHz. The card’s FP32 performance is rated at 16.20 TFLOPS, which is the raw compute power that drives the pixel and texture rates. The card’s percentile ranking of 69th among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25120, places it in the mid-range tier. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6700M and RX 6600, which have average scores of 25180 and 25235 respectively, showing a performance delta of less than 1%. This indicates that the RTX 3060 Ti is squarely in the middle of its performance class.
The GPU’s role in Lockdown Protocol is clearly dominant. The fact that lowering settings from High to Low at 1080p yields a 61% FPS increase is a strong indicator that the GPU’s shading units and ROPs are the limiting factor. In contrast, the CPU’s role is secondary. The 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth appears sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results suggest the card is running out of steam, likely due to a combination of memory bandwidth and raw compute limits.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The complete dataset provides a clear picture of performance across all combinations of resolution and settings.
At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. The Low preset delivers an average of 161.5 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate competitive play. Medium settings average 116 FPS, which is still excellent. High settings average 100.4 FPS, and even Ultra manages a highly playable 76.2 FPS. At this resolution, there is no performance concern for any settings preset.
Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers become more moderate. Low settings average 116 FPS, which is excellent. Medium drops to 80.9 FPS, and High follows at 72.2 FPS. These are all smooth, playable frame rates. Ultra averages 57.8 FPS, which dips below the 60 FPS mark but is still viable for single-player or less competitive modes. This is the resolution where the RTX 3060 Ti starts to show its limits.
At 3840x2160, the performance floor drops significantly. Low settings are the only preset that maintains a high frame rate, averaging 77.8 FPS. Medium averages 53.5 FPS, High drops to 46.5 FPS, and Ultra falls to 35.4 FPS. These numbers indicate that 4K gaming is only viable with the Low preset, and even then, the experience will be less smooth than at lower resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 1440p is the recommended starting point. At 2560x1440, Medium averages 80.9 FPS, which is a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS target. This provides a solid visual experience while leaving headroom for demanding scenes. If you prefer maximum visual fidelity, High at 1440p is also viable at 72.2 FPS, but you may notice dips in intense firefights.
For 1080p users, the choice is more flexible. High settings at 100.4 FPS is a great default, and Ultra at 76.2 FPS is also acceptable if you prioritize image quality over frame rate. For competitive play, Low at 161.5 FPS is the clear choice, as it maximizes responsiveness.
For 4K, the data is unambiguous: use the Low preset. The 77.8 FPS average is the only way to achieve a playable frame rate. Medium at 53.5 FPS is borderline, and High or Ultra are not recommended. If you have a 4K display and want higher settings, this benchmark data suggests the RTX 3060 Ti is not sufficient for this game at that resolution.
Overall, the data suggests that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The 9700X provides enough CPU power to avoid bottlenecks at these resolutions, but the GPU limits the system’s ability to push high frame rates at 4K.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is a high-end processor that is not the limiting factor in this benchmark. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, it offers substantial multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31588 is strong, but more importantly, its single-core score of 4459 is exceptionally high. This single-thread performance is critical for FPS games like Lockdown Protocol, which often rely on a few main threads for game logic and physics.
The CPU’s benchmark scores show it is a top-tier part. It ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 36029. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14500HX, has an average score of 35940, a delta of just 0.2%. This places the 9700X in a performance class with other high-end desktop and mobile processors. The high boost clock of 5.50 GHz and the 32 MB of shared L3 cache contribute to its responsiveness.
In the context of Lockdown Protocol, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with data. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p, the system reaches 161.5 FPS on Low settings, which is a frame rate that many CPUs would struggle to achieve. The fact that the 9700X can reach this level without bottlenecking confirms its power. The data indicates that the CPU is not the reason for the FPS drops at higher resolutions; that is entirely the GPU’s domain. The 9700X is overqualified for this GPU pairing, meaning it will not need an upgrade when you eventually move to a faster graphics card.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 77.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 53.5 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 46.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 116.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 80.9 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 72.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 57.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 161.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 116.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 100.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 76.2 |
Lockdown Protocol with Ryzen 7 9700X + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with RTX 3060 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700X + RTX 3060 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.