Lockdown Protocol

The data for Lockdown Protocol on the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT with the Intel Arc B370 reveals a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics component. The benchmark results show a combination that struggles to maintain playable frame rates at higher resolutions, while exhibiting a significant dependency on graphical settings to achieve acceptable performance. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, contextualizes the combo's rank, and examines the specific roles of the CPU and GPU in these results.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a steep performance curve as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 80 FPS. Moving to 1440p drops this to 58 FPS, a 27.5% reduction. The jump to 4K (3840x2160) is even more punishing, with the average falling to 38 FPS, a further 34.5% decrease from the 1440p figure. This pattern indicates that the Intel Arc B370 is the primary limiting factor; as the pixel count increases, the GPU's workload scales dramatically, leading to a rapid decline in frame rates.

The scaling behavior is consistent across all settings presets. For example, on High settings, the average FPS goes from 49 at 1080p to 36 at 1440p and finally to 23 at 4K. This near-linear drop with resolution increase is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck. The CPU, an 8-core/16-thread AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, is not likely to be the constraint at these resolutions, as the frame rate is more dependent on the graphics card's fill rate and shading power. The data suggests that the system is well-balanced for 1080p gaming but falls short of providing a smooth experience at higher resolutions, where the GPU's limitations become the dominant performance factor.

The difference between Low and Ultra settings also widens with resolution. At 1080p, the gap between the two presets is 43 FPS (80 vs. 37). At 4K, the gap narrows to 20 FPS (38 vs. 18). This narrowing gap is a further indication that at 4K, the GPU is so saturated that even reducing the graphical load from Ultra to Low yields a relatively smaller absolute gain in frame rate, as the sheer number of pixels is the primary hurdle.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and the Intel Arc B370 ranks at 2611 out of 2828 combos. This places it in the bottom 7.7% of all tested configurations, a position that underscores its performance limitations. The `comboRankInGame` field confirms this is a low-tier result, indicating that most other hardware pairings will deliver significantly higher frame rates.

This low ranking is unsurprising given the GPU's individual benchmark percentile. The Intel Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, meaning 95% of tested graphics cards perform better in synthetic benchmarks. Its average 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1184, placing it alongside much older and less capable hardware like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, with deltaPct values of -0.2% and -0.7% respectively. This indicates that while the Arc B370 is a modern chip (released in 2026), its raw performance level is comparable to entry-level or legacy graphics solutions.

The CPU, in contrast, is a much stronger component. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT sits at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29879. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, with performance deltas of 0% and 0.6% respectively. This shows that the processor is a high-performing part, more than capable of feeding a more powerful GPU. The combination of a strong CPU and a very weak GPU creates a significant bottleneck, where the system's overall gaming performance is almost entirely dictated by the Arc B370's limited capabilities.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is the central figure in this performance analysis. Its specifications reveal a part designed for efficiency over raw power. It features a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with a TDP of only 25 W. The memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses a portion of the system's main memory (DDR4) rather than dedicated VRAM. This architecture has profound implications for gaming performance, as memory bandwidth is "System Dependent" and will be significantly lower than that of a dedicated graphics card.

With 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs, the Arc B370's compute resources are limited. Its FP32 performance is rated at 6.144 TFLOPS, which is a modest figure for a modern GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 confirms its low standing, with its nearest rivals being the ATI Radeon HD 5770 and the AMD FirePro M2000. These are all older or lower-tier parts, and the data suggests that the Arc B370's performance in Lockdown Protocol will be similarly constrained.

The lack of dedicated VRAM is a critical factor. The GPU's memory is "System Shared," and its bus width and bandwidth are "System Shared" and "System Dependent" respectively. This design means the graphics processor is competing with the CPU for memory access, which can lead to stuttering and reduced frame rates, especially in a fast-paced FPS like Lockdown Protocol. The benchmark results reflect this, with the graphics card's low percentile ranking (5th) directly correlating with the poor FPS numbers observed in the game. The GPU is simply not equipped to handle the demands of smooth, high-resolution rendering.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at performance across various resolutions and settings. The figures are all in the sub-60 FPS range except for the 1080p Low and Medium settings. Here is the detailed breakdown:

• 1920x1080 (1080p):
• Low: 80 FPS average. This is the only configuration that achieves a high-refresh-rate level of smoothness.
• Medium: 57 FPS average, with a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS.
• High: 49 FPS average.
• Ultra: 37 FPS average.

• 2560x1440 (1440p):
• Low: 58 FPS average.
• Medium: 42 FPS average, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS.
• High: 36 FPS average.
• Ultra: 27 FPS average.

• 3840x2160 (4K):
• Low: 38 FPS average.
• Medium: 27 FPS average, with a minimum of 23 FPS and a maximum of 31 FPS.
• High: 23 FPS average.
• Ultra: 18 FPS average.

The data shows that at 1080p, the system is capable of playable frame rates, but only on lower presets. The 80 FPS on Low is the standout figure. The Medium preset at 57 FPS is also acceptable for many players. However, the High and Ultra presets at 1080p produce averages of 49 and 37 FPS, which may feel less fluid. At 1440p, the performance takes a clear hit, with all presets falling below 60 FPS. The 4K results are uniformly poor, with the highest average being just 38 FPS on Low, which is not suitable for a competitive FPS.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is a formidable processor that is not the limiting factor in this configuration. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, it offers substantial multi-threaded performance. Its benchmark scores are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 and a single-core score of 3359. This places it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, with its performance being essentially on par with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, as indicated by the 0% and -0.3% deltaPct values.

In the context of Lockdown Protocol, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and frame pacing. With a boost clock of 4.80 GHz and a substantial 32 MB of shared L3 cache, the 5800XT is well-equipped to feed frames to a graphics card. The data indicates that the CPU is not the bottleneck here. The `comboRankInGame` of 2611 is far more attributable to the GPU's 5th percentile ranking than to the CPU's 81st percentile standing. If the GPU were more powerful, the system could likely deliver much higher frame rates, as the 5800XT has the headroom to support a more capable graphics solution. The CPU's performance is a wasted asset in this pairing, as it is consistently waiting on the GPU to finish its rendering tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo can achieve in Lockdown Protocol?

A: The highest average FPS recorded in the data is 80, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, has a score of 1186, representing a delta of -0.2%. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, a delta of -0.5%.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck in this system?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is in the 81st CPU percentile, while the Intel Arc B370 is in the 5th GPU percentile, indicating the graphics card severely limits overall performance.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking for Lockdown Protocol?

A: This combo ranks 2611 out of 2828 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom percentile of all tested systems for this game.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 58 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 27 FPS, a difference of 31 FPS.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS recorded is 48, with an average of 57 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this hardware combination is found at 1080p. The only preset that consistently delivers a high level of performance is Low, which averages 80 FPS. This is the only configuration that approaches or exceeds the 60 FPS threshold that is generally considered smooth for a first-person shooter.

For players who prefer higher visual fidelity, the Medium preset at 1080p is a viable alternative. The average of 57 FPS is close to the 60 FPS target, and the minimum FPS of 48 is still playable. The High preset at 1080p yields an average of 49 FPS, which may be acceptable for some, but the lower frame rate and potential for dips could affect gameplay in a fast-paced title.

At 1440p, the data suggests that only the Low preset, with an average of 58 FPS, is marginally playable. All other presets at this resolution fall below 45 FPS, which is less than ideal. The 4K resolution is not recommended for this combo, as even the Low preset only manages an average of 38 FPS. The best experience, balancing visual quality and performance, is the Medium preset at 1920x1080. It provides a significant step up in visual detail from Low while maintaining an average frame rate of 57 FPS, which is close to the target for smooth gameplay.