Inside
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 144 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 61 | 65 | 103 | 129 |
| 1440p QHD | 98 | 103 | 164 | 206 |
| 1080p Full HD | 136 | 143 | 229 | 286 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Inside with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + AMD Radeon RX 7800M, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800M delivers a remarkably consistent gaming experience in Inside, one that scales predictably with both resolution and image quality settings. The data indicates a combination that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions but reveals surprising CPU headroom at 1080p, resulting in frame rates that range from highly playable at 4K Ultra to exceptionally high at 1080p Low. The benchmark results show this is a capable pairing for this title, though the performance curve suggests users can prioritize visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness, provided they are mindful of the specific settings that cause the largest performance dips.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is significant but not linear, revealing a classic GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 143 FPS at 1920x1080 to 103 FPS at 2560x1440, a decrease of 40 FPS. Moving to 3840x2160, the average further drops to 65 FPS, representing a 54.5% reduction from the 1080p figure. This steep decline at 4K indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 7800M is the primary limiting factor at this resolution, struggling to maintain the same level of performance as the pixel count increases substantially.
The scaling pattern at Medium settings follows a similar trajectory, albeit from a higher starting point. The average frame rate at 1080p is 229 FPS, which drops to 164 FPS at 1440p (a 28.4% reduction) and then to 103 FPS at 4K (a 55% reduction from 1080p). This consistent pattern across different settings tiers confirms that resolution is the dominant variable affecting performance. The fact that the 4K Medium result (103 FPS) exactly matches the 1440p High result (103 FPS) is a notable observation, suggesting that the GPU workload at these two distinct configurations is nearly identical, placing them at the same performance ceiling.
The most extreme example of resolution scaling is seen at Low settings. At 1080p, the combination produces an average of 286 FPS, which is an exceptionally high number for any title. This drops to 206 FPS at 1440p and further to 129 FPS at 4K. Even at the most demanding resolution with the lowest settings, the frame rate remains well above 60 FPS, demonstrating that the RX 7800M has enough raw power to handle this game comfortably. The performance difference between 1080p and 4K at Low settings is 157 FPS, a clear indicator that the GPU's rendering pipeline becomes the bottleneck as the pixel count rises, despite the relatively modest graphical demands of Inside.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7800M is clearly the dominant component in this pairing for this game, as evidenced by the resolution scaling data. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. For a puzzle platformer like Inside, this memory configuration is more than sufficient, as the game's art style and scene complexity do not typically require massive texture pools or high-resolution assets. The VRAM capacity is unlikely to be a limiting factor at any of the tested settings, even at 4K with Ultra presets.
The GPU's clock speeds are also a key factor in its performance. The base clock is 1295 MHz, with a game clock of 2145 MHz and a boost clock of 2335 MHz. These high boost clocks, coupled with the RDNA 3.0 architecture and 3840 shading units, allow the RX 7800M to maintain high throughput. The benchmark results show that the GPU can push frame rates well beyond 200 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating that its compute capabilities are not being fully taxed until the resolution increases. The 96 ROPs and 240 TMUs are well-balanced for this type of workload, ensuring that texture filtering and pixel output are not bottlenecks.
The performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K highlights the GPU's role clearly. At 4K Low, the average is 129 FPS, while at 4K Ultra, it drops to 61 FPS. This 68 FPS difference is almost entirely attributable to the increased graphical workload placed on the GPU. The Ultra preset likely enables more advanced lighting, shadow, and post-processing effects that require additional shader work and memory bandwidth. The data suggests that the RX 7800M is a strong performer for this game, but the Ultra preset at 4K pushes it to its limits, resulting in a frame rate that is just above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H plays a secondary but important role in this game's performance, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU has more headroom. The CPU features 14 cores and 18 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. This high boost clock is beneficial for Inside, which likely relies on a few threads for game logic and physics. The benchmark results suggest that the CPU is not a bottleneck at 1080p, as the frame rates achieved are extremely high, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor even at this resolution.
The CPU's performance is further contextualized by its Cinebench scores. A multi-core score of 12804.5 in Cinebench R23 and a single-core score of 1647.5 suggest a capable mobile processor. However, for Inside, the single-core performance is more critical, as puzzle platformers often have a single main thread for gameplay logic. The 4.50 GHz boost clock should provide adequate performance to feed the GPU, especially at 1080p where the GPU is producing over 200 FPS. The data shows that the CPU is not holding back the system, as the frame rates scale consistently with resolution changes, which is a hallmark of a GPU-bound scenario.
The fact that the frame rates at 1080p Low (286 FPS) are so high indicates that the CPU can handle even the most demanding framerate scenarios. If the CPU were a bottleneck, we would expect to see a plateau in performance at lower resolutions, where the GPU is less stressed. This is not the case, as the frame rates continue to rise as the resolution decreases. The Core Ultra 5 125H, with its 18 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support, provides sufficient bandwidth and processing power to ensure that the RX 7800M can operate at its full potential in this title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's performance across a matrix of resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combination is exceptionally fast. On Low settings, the average frame rate is 286 FPS, which is the highest recorded in the entire dataset. The Medium preset yields a still-impressive 229 FPS, with a minimum of 194 FPS and a maximum of 263 FPS, indicating smooth performance with no significant frame time spikes. High settings bring the average down to 143 FPS, while Ultra settings result in 136 FPS. All of these values are well above the 60 FPS threshold, making 1080p the ideal resolution for high refresh rate displays.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong, though the gap between settings narrows. The Low preset produces an average of 206 FPS, which is still exceptionally high. Medium settings deliver 164 FPS, with a minimum of 140 FPS and a maximum of 189 FPS. High settings drop to 103 FPS, and Ultra settings settle at 98 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at this resolution is a mere 5 FPS, suggesting that the additional visual effects in the Ultra preset do not heavily tax the GPU at 1440p. This is a sweet spot for the RX 7800M, as it can deliver high fidelity at frame rates that are smooth and responsive.
At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more demanding, but the system still delivers playable results. Low settings average 129 FPS, providing a high-refresh-rate experience even at 4K. Medium settings drop to 103 FPS, with a minimum of 88 FPS and a maximum of 119 FPS, showing some variance but maintaining a solid average. High settings are still playable at 65 FPS, but Ultra settings fall to 61 FPS. The minimum FPS values for the 4K Medium setting indicate that there can be dips below 90 FPS, but the average remains comfortable. For a game like Inside, which is not a fast-paced competitive shooter, these frame rates are more than sufficient for an immersive experience.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and the AMD Radeon RX 7800M ranks at position 1877 out of 2887 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the lower-middle tier of the benchmark database, which is a significant finding given the GPU's strong individual performance. The rank suggests that while this pairing is capable of running the game well, there are many other CPU-GPU combinations that achieve higher frame rates. This is likely due to the CPU's mobile nature, which may not provide the same level of sustained performance as a desktop counterpart.
The GPU itself has a percentile rank of 73 among all GPUs, indicating it performs better than 73% of the tested graphics cards. Its average benchmark score is 27883, which is very close to its nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X. This suggests that the RX 7800M is a solid performer, but not a top-tier part. The CPU has a percentile rank of 79, with an average benchmark score of 27507, placing it in a similar performance bracket to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and the Intel Core i5-12600K.
Despite the relatively low combo rank, the actual gaming experience is positive. The rank is a relative measure against all other combinations, and the fact that Inside is a lightweight title means that even lower-ranked combos can achieve high frame rates. The data shows that this specific pairing is more than adequate for the game, with the 4K Ultra preset being the only configuration that dips near the 60 FPS line. For most users, this combo will provide a buttery-smooth experience, and the rank should be interpreted as a reflection of the hardware's overall position in the database, not a commentary on its suitability for this specific title.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combination depend on the user's resolution and performance priorities. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers an average of 136 FPS while providing the highest level of visual fidelity. The difference between High and Ultra is only 7 FPS, so enabling the highest preset is a no-brainer for users with 1080p displays. The Medium preset offers a higher frame rate of 229 FPS, but the visual upgrade from Medium to Ultra is substantial for a game with this art style, making the slight performance trade-off worthwhile.
At 2560x1440, the High preset appears to be the best balance of performance and visual quality. It delivers an average of 103 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold, while the Ultra preset only offers 5 FPS less. However, the jump from Medium to High likely brings significant visual improvements, making High the recommended setting. Users who prioritize frame rate above all else can opt for Medium at 164 FPS, but the visual downgrade may be noticeable. The Ultra preset at 1440p is also viable for those who want maximum detail, as 98 FPS is still a very playable frame rate.
At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the recommended setting for a smooth experience. It delivers an average of 103 FPS, which is excellent for 4K gaming. The High preset drops to 65 FPS, which is still playable but represents a significant decrease in smoothness. The Ultra preset at 61 FPS is right at the edge of what is considered playable, and users may notice occasional frame drops. The data shows that 4K Medium is the sweet spot, providing a high frame rate with a good level of visual detail. For users with a 4K display, the Medium preset is the best choice to ensure a consistently smooth experience without compromising too much on visual quality.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
AMD Radeon RX 7800M
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + AMD Radeon RX 7800M in Inside
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 129.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 103.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 65.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 61.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 206.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 164.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 103.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 98.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 286.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 229.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 143.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 136.0 |
Inside with iUltra 5 125H + Other GPUs
See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Other Games with iUltra 5 125H + RX 7800M
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.