Inside

The Intel Core i7-13700K and Intel Arc B570 pairing delivers a remarkably fluid experience in Inside, a puzzle platformer that scales efficiently across resolutions. The data shows a combination where the CPU’s high thread count and the GPU’s modern architecture combine to produce triple-digit frame rates at most settings, with only the most demanding 4K presets dipping below 60 FPS. This build is clearly oriented toward high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K as a viable option if you are willing to adjust quality presets.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes.

For a game like Inside, which is a 2D puzzle platformer rather than a massive open-world simulation, the CPU demands are relatively modest compared to AAA shooters. However, the i7-13700K’s specifications ensure that it is never a bottleneck, even at high frame rates. In synthetic benchmarks, the processor scores 30,745 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2,116 in single-core, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 19,429 and single-core of 2,529. The Passmark multithread score is 45,887, and the single-thread score is 4,333.

The processor’s 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates that it outperforms the vast majority of installed processors. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a near-tie: it is 0.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and 0.3% slower than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, but it is 0.5% faster than both the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and the Intel Xeon w3-2535. These differences are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning the i7-13700K provides a solid foundation that will not hold back the GPU in Inside.

The high boost clock of 5.40 GHz is particularly relevant for a game that relies on single-threaded performance for game logic and physics updates. While Inside is not a demanding title, the CPU’s ability to maintain high clocks ensures that frame times remain consistent, which contributes to the smooth 240 FPS average seen at 1080p Low settings. The 16 cores and 24 threads are more than sufficient, and the data suggests that the CPU’s headroom is vast for this type of game, leaving plenty of processing power for background tasks or streaming.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B570 is a Battlemage-generation GPU using the Xe2-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. It operates at a consistent 2500 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The card features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. Its compute resources include 2,304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, with 18 ray tracing cores. The GPU’s FP32 performance is rated at 11.52 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The B570 sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20,556. Its nearest rivals are extremely close: it is 0.1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, 0.1% slower than the Intel Arc A750, 0.4% faster than the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, and 0.5% slower than the AMD Radeon R9 M390X. This places the B570 in a competitive mid-range tier, which is precisely where the measured FPS data shows it performing.

In Inside, the GPU’s role is pivotal at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, the GPU is the primary driver of the 240 FPS average on Low settings, but even at 4K Ultra, it manages a 52 FPS average. The 10 GB VRAM is more than adequate for this game’s simple textures and geometry, and the 380 GB/s bandwidth ensures that there are no memory bottlenecks. The clock speed of 2500 MHz is moderate, but the architecture’s efficiency shines through in the scaling from 1080p to 4K, where the FPS drops from 240 to 108 at Low settings, showing a 45% reduction, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario.

The GPU’s performance at 1440p is particularly strong, with a 172 FPS average on Low and 86 FPS on High. This indicates that the B570 is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors in this title. The 4K results are playable but require settings adjustments, as the gap between Low (108 FPS) and Ultra (52 FPS) shows a 52% performance hit, which is significant but expected for a mid-range card at 4K.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Inside at 240 FPS?*

A: Yes, at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the measured average FPS is 240. This is the highest recorded average in the dataset, indicating a perfectly smooth experience on a 240 Hz monitor.

Q: What is the best resolution for this pairing?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 is the sweet spot. At Medium settings, the average FPS is 138, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold, and even at High settings, it maintains an 86 FPS average. This offers a balance between visual fidelity and high refresh rates.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K is effectively tied with its nearest rivals. It is 0.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and 0.5% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX. For gaming, these differences are imperceptible.

Q: Is the GPU’s VRAM sufficient for 4K gaming?

A: The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for Inside at 4K, as the highest settings only require a fraction of that capacity. The measured 4K Ultra average of 52 FPS indicates that the limiting factor is raw compute power, not memory capacity.

Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 172 on Low to 82 on Ultra, a 52% decrease. The Medium setting offers a middle ground at 138 FPS, which is likely the best compromise for most users.

Q: Does this combo have any frame drops?

A: The dataset includes minimum FPS values for Medium settings only. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 163 FPS, at 1440p Medium it is 117 FPS, and at 4K Medium it is 74 FPS. These minimums are all above 60 FPS, indicating stable performance without severe hitches.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo covers three resolutions and four settings levels, providing a comprehensive view of performance scaling.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the results are as follows:

• Low: 108 FPS average
• Medium: 87 FPS average, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS
• High: 54 FPS average
• Ultra: 52 FPS average

The progression from Low to Ultra shows a clear trend: the average FPS drops by 56 FPS (from 108 to 52) as settings increase. The Medium setting is the only one with min/max data, showing a 26 FPS range between the minimum and maximum, which indicates some variability but remains playable.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the results are:

• Low: 172 FPS average
• Medium: 138 FPS average, with a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS
• High: 86 FPS average
• Ultra: 82 FPS average

The 1440p results show a similar pattern, with a 90 FPS difference between Low and Ultra. The Medium setting provides a 42 FPS range between min and max, which is tighter than at 4K, suggesting more consistent frame pacing.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the results are:

• Low: 240 FPS average
• Medium: 192 FPS average, with a minimum of 163 FPS and a maximum of 221 FPS
• High: 120 FPS average
• Ultra: 114 FPS average

The 1080p results are the most impressive, with the Low setting hitting the 240 FPS cap, likely limited by the display or V-Sync. The Medium setting shows a 58 FPS range between min and max, which is the widest in the dataset, but the minimum of 163 FPS is still exceptionally high.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the Intel Core i7-13700K and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2301 out of 2887 tested combos in Inside, placing it in the 20th percentile of all tested systems. This ranking might seem low, but it is important to contextualize it: the database includes many high-end systems with top-tier GPUs, and Inside is not a demanding title. The ranking reflects the absolute performance of the combo relative to all others, not a judgment of its playability.

The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking is much higher than the combo’s overall rank, indicating that the processor is not the limiting factor. The GPU’s 65th percentile ranking is more aligned with the combo’s position, suggesting that the B570 is the performance ceiling in this pairing. The data shows that the combo is well-matched in the sense that the CPU can easily feed the GPU, but the GPU’s mid-range tier holds it back from ranking higher in a game where high-end GPUs can achieve 300+ FPS at 1080p.

Compared to other combos, this one offers a balanced profile. The CPU’s nearest rivals show a delta of less than 0.5%, meaning that swapping the i7-13700K for a Ryzen 9 5900 would change the ranking by a negligible amount. Similarly, the GPU’s nearest rivals are within 0.5% of its average score, so the ranking would be similar with an Arc A750 or RTX 3070 Mobile. This indicates that the combo’s rank is determined more by the GPU tier than the specific CPU choice.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience per the measured rows, the Medium preset is the clear winner across all resolutions. It offers a significant performance boost over High and Ultra while maintaining a visual quality that is likely indistinguishable in a game with Inside’s minimalist art style.

At 1920x1080, Medium delivers a 192 FPS average, which is 60% faster than High (120 FPS) and 68% faster than Ultra (114 FPS). The minimum FPS of 163 ensures that even in busy scenes, the frame rate stays well above 144 Hz, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The jump from Low (240 FPS) to Medium (192 FPS) is a 20% reduction, but the visual improvements are worth it for most users.

At 2560x1440, Medium provides a 138 FPS average, which is 60% faster than High (86 FPS) and 68% faster than Ultra (82 FPS). This is the recommended resolution for this combo, as it balances sharpness and performance perfectly. The minimum FPS of 117 is still above 100, ensuring a smooth experience on 120 Hz or 144 Hz displays.

At 3840x2160, Medium achieves an 87 FPS average, which is 61% faster than High (54 FPS) and 67% faster than Ultra (52 FPS). This is the only 4K preset that breaks the 60 FPS barrier comfortably, making it the only viable option for 4K gaming. The minimum FPS of 74 means that the game will rarely dip below 60 FPS, providing a playable experience on a 4K TV or monitor.

If you prioritize maximum frame rates and have a 240 Hz monitor, Low at 1080p is the only setting that hits the 240 FPS mark. However, for the vast majority of users, Medium at 1440p offers the best combination of visual fidelity and performance, making it the default recommendation for this combo. High and Ultra presets are only recommended for users who prefer visual consistency over frame rate, as they still produce playable results at 1080p and 1440p, but the frame rate penalty is steep.