Inside
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 174 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 76 | 83 | 124 | 162 |
| 1440p QHD | 121 | 126 | 201 | 253 |
| 1080p Full HD | 166 | 175 | 284 | 316 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Inside with Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination ranks at position 774 out of 1671 tested combos for Inside, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all systems benchmarked. This percentile positioning suggests a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically bottlenecks the other, though the rank reflects a game that is relatively lightweight by modern standards. The combo sits closer to the median than to the top, which is expected given that Inside is a 2016 puzzle platformer with modest hardware demands. The data indicates that this pairing is capable of very high frame rates across all tested configurations, with the rank primarily influenced by how other, often more expensive, combinations perform in the same title.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 774 out of 1671 represents the 46th percentile of all tested combinations, meaning roughly 54% of pairings deliver higher average FPS in Inside. This is a solid mid-pack result, but it is important to contextualize it against the hardware’s potential. The RTX 5060 alone sits at the 73rd percentile among all GPUs, while the i5-12400 ranks at the 77th percentile among CPUs. The discrepancy between these individual component percentiles and the combo’s lower overall rank suggests that Inside does not fully stress either part, allowing even weaker pairings to achieve competitive frame rates. The data implies that the game’s engine is more dependent on raw fill rate and memory bandwidth than on complex CPU logic, which benefits the RTX 5060’s specifications but leaves the i5-12400’s multi-threading capabilities underutilized.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12400 provides 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This Alder Lake-S architecture processor features an 18 MB shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory. The CPU’s benchmark scores reveal strong single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 910 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2249. In Inside, which is not a heavily threaded title, this single-core strength is likely the dominant factor. The game’s puzzle platformer mechanics involve simple physics and limited AI, so the 12 threads rarely see full utilization. The data shows the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities are nearly irrelevant here; the 3DMark max-threads score of 5890 is only marginally higher than the 8-thread result of 4745, indicating diminishing returns beyond a few cores. The i5-12400’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-9700 with a deltaPct of 0.1% and the Intel Core i7-8700 at -0.2%, show that the CPU is competitively positioned, but in this game, even a slower CPU would likely produce similar FPS due to the GPU being the primary limiter at higher settings.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 2280 MHz with a boost clock of 2497 MHz, and it features 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The GPU’s pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s are particularly relevant for Inside, which uses a monochromatic, high-contrast art style that relies heavily on fill rate and texture sampling. The data shows that the RTX 5060’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, has a deltaPct of 0%, indicating near-identical average benchmark scores. However, in Inside, the RTX 5060’s performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, suggesting that the GPU’s memory bandwidth is the limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where FPS drops to 76.2. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for this game, as even at 4K, the memory footprint does not exceed the available capacity, allowing the GPU to focus on compute rather than swapping data.
FAQ
*Q: Is this combo overkill for Inside?*
A: The data suggests yes. At 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 316.4 FPS, which far exceeds the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. Even at 4K Ultra, the FPS remains above 76, indicating that the hardware is not stressed to its limits.
Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its closest rival in this game?
A: The RTX 5060’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, has a deltaPct of 0% in average benchmark scores. In Inside, the measured FPS shows that the RTX 5060 maintains high frame rates across all settings, but the game’s simplicity means the rival would likely perform similarly.
*Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in Inside?*
A: Benchmark results indicate no. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 316.4 FPS, which is a CPU-limited scenario for many games, but the i5-12400’s single-thread score of 910 in 3DMark suggests it can handle the game’s logic without holding back the GPU.
Q: What is the best setting for a 144 Hz monitor?
A: At 1440p High, the combo delivers 125.8 FPS, which is below 144. However, dropping to Medium at 1440p yields 200.8 FPS, comfortably exceeding the refresh rate. For 1080p, even Ultra at 165.6 FPS is sufficient.
Q: How does the combo rank percentile-wise?
A: The combo ranks 774 out of 1671, placing it in the 46th percentile. This is lower than the individual component percentiles, reflecting the game’s low hardware demands.
*Q: Is 8 GB of VRAM enough for Inside?*
A: Yes. The game’s maximum VRAM usage at 4K Ultra does not exceed the 8 GB capacity, as evidenced by the stable 76.2 FPS at that setting. The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s is more critical than capacity here.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS progression from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear scaling pattern tied to the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth. At 1080p High, the combo achieves 174.8 FPS, which drops to 125.8 FPS at 1440p and further to 82.8 FPS at 4K. This represents a 52.7% decrease from 1080p to 4K at High settings. The scaling is more aggressive at Ultra: 165.6 FPS at 1080p falls to 121.2 FPS at 1440p and then to 76.2 FPS at 4K, a 54% drop. This consistent reduction indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting component as resolution increases, since the CPU’s workload remains constant. The RTX 5060’s 128-bit memory bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are the likely bottlenecks at 4K, as the pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s becomes saturated. At Low settings, the scaling is even more pronounced: 316.4 FPS at 1080p drops to 253 FPS at 1440p and 161.9 FPS at 4K, a 48.8% decrease. This suggests that even at minimal settings, the GPU’s memory bandwidth limits performance at higher resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data offers clear guidance for optimal settings based on display refresh rates. For 1080p displays, the Ultra preset at 165.6 FPS is the best choice, as it delivers the highest visual quality while still exceeding 144 Hz. For 1440p, the Medium preset at 200.8 FPS is recommended for high-refresh monitors, but for 60 Hz displays, Ultra at 121.2 FPS provides the best visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. At 4K, the High preset at 82.8 FPS is the sweet spot, as it balances visual quality with playable frame rates; Ultra at 76.2 FPS is also viable but offers diminishing returns. The Low preset at 4K (161.9 FPS) is unnecessary for most users, as the visual downgrade is significant compared to High. The data indicates that the Medium preset across all resolutions provides a 50-60% FPS boost over Ultra, making it the most efficient choice for competitive play, while High offers the best balance of quality and performance for immersive single-player experiences.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 316.4 FPS on Low, 283.8 FPS on Medium, 174.8 FPS on High, and 165.6 FPS on Ultra. The jump from Low to Medium is modest at 10.3%, but from Medium to High the drop is significant at 38.4%, indicating a heavy visual effect cost. Ultra is only 5.3% slower than High, suggesting that the additional settings have minimal impact.
At 2560x1440, the FPS values are 253 on Low, 200.8 on Medium, 125.8 on High, and 121.2 on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Medium is 20.7%, while Medium to High drops by 37.3%. The difference between High and Ultra is 3.7%, showing that the GPU is nearing its limits at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the FPS drops to 161.9 on Low, 124.3 on Medium, 82.8 on High, and 76.2 on Ultra. The Low to Medium drop is 23.2%, and Medium to High falls by 33.4%. The Ultra setting is only 8% slower than High, but the absolute frame rates are now below 100, making High the most practical option for 4K gaming. Across all resolutions, the RTX 5060’s performance scales consistently with settings, but the i5-12400’s influence diminishes as resolution increases, confirming the GPU as the dominant factor in Inside.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Inside
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 161.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 124.3 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 82.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 76.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 253.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 200.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 125.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 121.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 316.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 283.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 174.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 165.6 |
Inside with ii5-12400 + Other GPUs
See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Inside with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs
See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12400 + RTX 5060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.