Inside

Inside

AVERAGE FPS
100
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 100 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 45 43 71 90
1440p QHD 70 73 112 144
1080p Full HD 92 99 156 200

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 90
3840x2160 Medium 71
3840x2160 Ultra 45
3840x2160 High 43
2560x1440 Low 144
2560x1440 Medium 112
2560x1440 High 73
2560x1440 Ultra 70
1920x1080 Low 200
1920x1080 Medium 156
1920x1080 High 99
1920x1080 Ultra 92

Inside with AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB delivers a highly playable experience in Inside, but the data reveals a clear and consistent pattern: this is a GPU-bound combination at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s strong single-thread performance allows the frame rate to soar when graphical load is reduced. The measured results across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K show that the RTX 3050 4 GB is the primary limiting factor, yet the Ryzen 9 5900X ensures that even the most demanding settings remain fluid.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and tells a straightforward story about where the bottleneck lies. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves a measured average of 200 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops that figure to 144.4 FPS, a reduction of 55.6 FPS or roughly 28%. At 4K Low, the average falls to 90.2 FPS, which is less than half of the 1080p result. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU that is being pushed to its limits, as the resolution increase demands exponentially more pixel throughput.

The gap between 1440p and 4K is particularly telling. At High settings, 1440p yields 72.9 FPS, but 4K High plummets to 43.1 FPS, a drop of 29.8 FPS. Similarly, at Medium settings, the 1440p result of 112 FPS falls to 71.3 FPS at 4K, a 40.7 FPS decline. These steep reductions indicate that the RTX 3050 4 GB’s memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s and its 128-bit bus are being saturated at 4K, causing the frame rate to scale poorly. The 1080p to 1440p transition is less punishing, with the High preset only losing 26.1 FPS (from 99 to 72.9), suggesting that the GPU still has headroom at the lower resolution.

What this data indicates is that the CPU’s role diminishes as resolution increases. The Ryzen 9 5900X, with its 12 cores and 24 threads, is more than capable of feeding the GPU at 1080p, as evidenced by the 200 FPS Low result. However, at 4K, the GPU becomes the sole constraint, and the CPU’s advantage is largely irrelevant. For players targeting high refresh rates, 1080p is the sweet spot, while 4K is only viable at Low settings, where the 90.2 FPS average remains respectable.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is the decisive component in this pairing, and its specifications directly explain the measured frame rates. The GPU features a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1740 MHz, with 2048 shading units and 32 ROPs. Its 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. These specs, while modest by modern standards, are sufficient for Inside’s stylized 2D presentation, but they are clearly taxed at higher resolutions.

The data shows that the GPU’s VRAM capacity is not the primary issue here, as even at 4K Ultra, the combo manages an average of 44.7 FPS. Instead, the frame rate scaling suggests that the GPU’s raw compute and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 91.5 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 44.7 FPS, a 51.1% reduction. This is consistent with a GPU that is running out of pixel throughput rather than memory capacity.

The RTX 3050 4 GB’s position in the broader market is reflected in its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, indicating it is an average performer. Its 7.127 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 111.4 GTexel/s texture rate are adequate for a game like Inside, which does not rely on heavy geometry or complex shaders. The GPU’s 90 W TDP and dual-slot design suggest it is an entry-level part, but the benchmark results show that it can still deliver a smooth experience at 1080p and even 1440p, provided settings are moderated.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB ranks 1509 out of 1671 combos for Inside. This places it in the lower 10% of all tested configurations, which is a surprising result given the CPU’s strength. The Ryzen 9 5900X itself is a top-tier processor, ranking in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39453. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 4245P, which scores 39383 (a 0.2% difference), and the Intel Core i7-13700F, which scores 39095 (0.9% lower).

The low combo rank is almost entirely attributable to the GPU. The RTX 3050 4 GB’s 50th percentile ranking among GPUs drags the overall combo down, despite the CPU’s excellent performance. In the context of Inside, which is not a demanding title, this pairing is held back by the GPU’s limited 4 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus. The data shows that the CPU is not the bottleneck; rather, the GPU’s modest specifications prevent the combo from achieving higher frame rates, particularly at 4K.

This ranking highlights a common hardware pairing mismatch: a high-end CPU paired with a low-end GPU. The Ryzen 9 5900X, with its 64 MB of L3 cache and 7 nm process, is capable of much higher frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the RTX 3050 4 GB cannot keep up. For players who prioritize CPU performance for other tasks, this combo may be acceptable, but for gaming, the data indicates that a more balanced pairing would yield better results.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution. At 1080p, the High preset provides an average of 99 FPS, which is smooth and visually pleasing. However, the Ultra preset drops to 91.5 FPS, a modest 7.5 FPS reduction that may not justify the extra graphical fidelity. For players with high refresh rate monitors, the Low preset at 200 FPS is the best choice, as it provides a significant frame rate boost with minimal visual impact in a game like Inside.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the recommended balance, offering 112 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset at 72.9 FPS is also viable, but the drop from Medium to High is 39.1 FPS, which is substantial. The Low preset at 144.4 FPS is ideal for competitive play, but the visual downgrade may be noticeable. For most players, Medium at 1440p provides the best experience, as it maintains high frame rates without sacrificing too much detail.

At 4K, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset is the only setting that provides a consistently smooth experience, with an average of 90.2 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 71.3 FPS, which is still playable, but the High and Ultra presets fall to 43.1 FPS and 44.7 FPS, respectively, which are below the 60 FPS target. For 4K gaming, the Low preset is recommended, as the frame rate drop from Low to Medium is 18.9 FPS, which is significant. The Ultra preset offers no advantage over High, with a difference of only 1.6 FPS, indicating that the GPU is fully saturated at these settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the combo’s performance across all resolutions and settings. At 1080p, the results are as follows: Low averages 200 FPS, Medium averages 155.5 FPS, High averages 99 FPS, and Ultra averages 91.5 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 54.3% reduction, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario.

At 1440p, the results are: Low averages 144.4 FPS, Medium averages 112 FPS, High averages 72.9 FPS, and Ultra averages 69.9 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 74.5 FPS, or 51.6%. Notably, the difference between High and Ultra at 1440p is only 3 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset offers little benefit over High.

At 4K, the results are: Low averages 90.2 FPS, Medium averages 71.3 FPS, High averages 43.1 FPS, and Ultra averages 44.7 FPS. The scaling here is less linear, with a significant drop from Medium to High of 28.2 FPS. The Ultra preset is slightly faster than High, with a 1.6 FPS advantage, which is within the margin of error and indicates that both presets are equally taxing on the GPU.

The data shows a consistent pattern: the RTX 3050 4 GB delivers its best performance at 1080p, where it can exceed 90 FPS on all presets. At 1440p, only Low and Medium presets maintain high frame rates, while at 4K, only Low is recommended. The Ryzen 9 5900X’s single-thread performance, as evidenced by its 3dmark_single_thread score of 941 and PassMark single-thread score of 3469, ensures that the CPU never becomes a limiting factor, even at 1080p Low where the GPU is pushed to 200 FPS. Overall, this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, with 1440p being a viable alternative at reduced settings.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4800 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

VRAM 4 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1740 MHz MHz
TDP 90 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB in Inside

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 90.2
3840x2160 Medium 71.3
3840x2160 Ultra 44.7
3840x2160 High 43.1
2560x1440 Low 144.4
2560x1440 Medium 112.0
2560x1440 High 72.9
2560x1440 Ultra 69.9
1920x1080 Low 200.0
1920x1080 Medium 155.5
1920x1080 High 99.0
1920x1080 Ultra 91.5

Inside with RTX 3050 4 GB + Other CPUs

See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 5900X + RTX 3050 4 GB

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.