Inside

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ranks last in the benchmark database for Inside, placing 1671 out of 1671 tested combos. This is a decisive bottom-tier result, indicating that this combination is the least performant option among all recorded systems for this title. The data shows a stark contrast between the CPU's strong synthetic showing and the GPU's position in the lower percentile bracket, which sets the stage for a heavily GPU-bound experience.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s position at rank 1671 of 1671 combos is unambiguous. The data places this system at the absolute bottom of the performance ladder for Inside. This result is driven by the graphics card, which sits at the 30th percentile of all GPUs, while the processor is far more capable, ranking in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The pairing creates a significant imbalance; benchmark results indicate the GPU is the primary bottleneck in nearly every scenario. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 29774 places it in close competition with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, which scores 29740 and is a mere 0.1% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, which is 0.3% behind. However, this processing power is largely untapped, as the GTX 1050 Ti’s average score of 5316 puts it in a dead heat with the NVIDIA GeForce 930A, which is 0% different, and just 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 940M. The disparity between the two components' relative standings explains why the combo’s overall rank is so low, as the system's frame rate is dictated by the weaker component.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the defining component for this combo’s performance in Inside. It features 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.1 GB/s. The card’s base clock is 1291 MHz, with a boost clock of 1392 MHz, and its memory runs at 1752 MHz, or 7 Gbps effective. These specifications are modest by modern standards, and the GPU's benchmark scores reflect that, with a Passmark G3D score of 6340 and a DirectX 11 score of 45. The data shows that the GPU’s capabilities are the limiting factor in this game. For instance, at 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 108.4 FPS, but at 4K with High settings, it drops to 22 FPS. This performance scaling is characteristic of a GPU that is being pushed to its limits, where the CPU’s overhead is negligible. The GPU's 2.138 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 44.54 GPixel/s pixel rate are the hard limits that dictate the frame rates seen in the measured data.

FAQ

*Q: Why does this combo rank last out of all tested combinations for Inside?*

A: The combo’s rank of 1671 out of 1671 is due to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, which has an average benchmark score of 5316 and ranks in the 30th percentile of all GPUs. The CPU is far more powerful, but the GPU's performance ceiling prevents the system from achieving higher frame rates.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT has an average benchmark score of 29774. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, which scores 29740, and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, which scores 29682. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, which scores 29856, by 0.3%.

*Q: What is the best performance the system can achieve in Inside?*

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 108.4 FPS, which is achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the measured data that exceeds the 100 FPS mark.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in this system?

A: The GPU is the main bottleneck. The GTX 1050 Ti ranks in the 30th percentile of all GPUs, while the Ryzen 7 5800XT ranks in the 86th percentile. The frame rates are consistently limited by the graphics card's performance, as seen in the significant FPS drops when resolution increases.

Q: How does the GTX 1050 Ti compare to its closest competitors?

A: The GTX 1050 Ti has an average benchmark score of 5316. It performs identically to the NVIDIA GeForce 930A, which has a 0% delta, and is 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 940M. It is 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon R7 240.

Q: What is the lowest frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average frame rate is 22 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with High settings. The 4K Ultra configuration is slightly higher at 23.7 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system's capabilities across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system shows a wide range of performance. With Low settings, it reaches 108.4 FPS, which is the highest frame rate in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium settings, the average FPS drops to 85.5. High settings yield 53.8 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 48.3 FPS. This shows a predictable decline as graphical demands increase.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops noticeably. The Low preset yields an average of 76.2 FPS, which is still playable. Medium settings average 59.4 FPS, and High settings drop to 37.8 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution averages 40.2 FPS, which is slightly higher than the High preset, indicating a possible anomaly in the data. Finally, at 3840x2160, the system struggles. Low settings manage an average of 50.9 FPS, but Medium drops to 37.2 FPS. High settings fall to 22 FPS, and Ultra settings are only marginally better at 23.7 FPS.

Resolution Scaling

The data shows a steep performance penalty as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 108.4 FPS at 1920x1080 to 76.2 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 32.2 FPS, and then to 50.9 FPS at 3840x2160. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting component, as the workload scales directly with pixel count. At High settings, the decline is even more pronounced, with a drop from 53.8 FPS at 1080p to 37.8 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 22 FPS at 4K. The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K at High settings is 31.8 FPS, which is a 59% reduction. This significant scaling behavior confirms that the GTX 1050 Ti's 4 GB of VRAM and 112.1 GB/s of bandwidth are insufficient for higher resolutions in this title, and the card is operating at its absolute limit.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience for this combo is found at 1920x1080 with Low settings, which produces an average of 108.4 FPS. This is the only configuration that provides a consistently smooth frame rate above 60 FPS. For players who prefer higher visual fidelity, the Medium preset at 1080p is a viable option, averaging 85.5 FPS. This represents a good balance between image quality and performance. The High preset at 1080p is still playable at 53.8 FPS, but the Ultra preset at 48.3 FPS may feel less fluid.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only configuration that consistently stays above the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 76.2 FPS. The Medium preset at 59.4 FPS is close to playable, but may experience occasional dips. The High and Ultra presets at this resolution are not recommended, as they fall below 40 FPS. At 3840x2160, no settings are recommended for a smooth experience, as even the Low preset averages only 50.9 FPS, and the High and Ultra presets are in the low 20s, making them effectively unplayable. The data suggests that the system is best suited for 1080p gaming, with the Low or Medium presets providing the most stable performance.