Inside
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 142 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 61 | 64 | 102 | 127 |
| 1440p QHD | 97 | 101 | 162 | 203 |
| 1080p Full HD | 134 | 141 | 226 | 282 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Inside with AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination delivers exceptional performance in Inside, a Puzzle Platformer from 2016. The measured data shows this pairing is overwhelmingly powerful for this title, producing frame rates that will satisfy users with high-refresh-rate displays at any resolution. The analysis below breaks down the optimal settings, the role of each component, and how this specific combo ranks against other tested hardware configurations.
Settings Recommendations
For the best experience, the Medium preset offers the most balanced performance across all tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, Medium settings produce an average of 226 FPS, which is 85 FPS higher than the High preset's 141 FPS and 92 FPS above the Ultra preset's 134 FPS. The gap between Medium and Low at 1080p is 56 FPS, but the visual fidelity improvement from Low to Medium is substantial enough to justify the minor performance trade-off.
At 2560x1440, Medium remains the optimal choice, delivering 162 FPS average. This is 61 FPS ahead of High (101 FPS) and 65 FPS ahead of Ultra (97 FPS). The Low preset at this resolution hits 203 FPS, but the extra 41 FPS over Medium is unlikely to be perceptible on most displays, while the graphical downgrade is immediately visible. The 1440p Medium result is particularly impressive because it remains well above the 144 Hz threshold, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming.
At 3840x2160, Medium produces 102 FPS average, with a minimum of 87 FPS and maximum of 117 FPS. This is the only 4K preset that maintains a triple-digit average while preserving reasonable visual quality. The High preset drops to 64 FPS, and Ultra falls to 61 FPS, both of which are playable but not optimal for smooth motion. Low at 4K reaches 127 FPS, but the visual compromise is significant for a game that relies heavily on atmospheric lighting and shadow effects.
The data suggests that Medium is the sweet spot for this hardware combination. It maintains frame rates above 100 FPS at 4K, above 160 FPS at 1440p, and above 220 FPS at 1080p. The measured minimum of 87 FPS at 4K Medium indicates that even the most demanding scenes remain fluid. For users prioritizing maximum smoothness over fidelity, Low at 1080p (282 FPS) or 1440p (203 FPS) are valid alternatives, but for most players, Medium offers the best balance of visual quality and performance.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's boost clock reaches 2655 MHz, with a game clock of 2250 MHz and base clock of 1720 MHz. These specifications, combined with the RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 6 nm process, position the RX 7600 as a capable mid-range graphics card, ranking in the 57th percentile among all GPUs.
In Inside, the GPU demonstrates strong scaling across resolution and settings changes. The transition from Low to Ultra at 1080p reduces average FPS from 282 to 134, a 52% drop. At 1440p, the same settings transition drops performance from 203 to 97 FPS (52% reduction), and at 4K, from 127 to 61 FPS (52% reduction). This consistent scaling indicates that the GPU is the primary driver of performance in this title, with settings changes having a predictable impact.
The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for this game, as evidenced by the stable performance at 4K Ultra (61 FPS average). The memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and the 128-bit bus are adequate for the game's texture and geometry demands. The GPU's pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s provide ample fill rate for the game's side-scrolling perspective and detailed environments.
Compared to its nearest rivals in the benchmark database, the RX 7600 sits within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon 680M, 0.6% of the AMD Radeon Pro 560X, and 0.2% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The RX 7600's performance in Inside aligns with its overall benchmark standing, showing that the GPU handles this title's requirements without bottlenecking the CPU.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and AMD Radeon RX 7600 ranks 2500th out of 3716 tested combinations for Inside. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, which is somewhat surprising given the high absolute frame rates measured. The ranking reflects that many other combinations in the database feature more powerful GPUs or CPUs, even though this pairing delivers excellent real-world performance for this specific title.
The CPU itself ranks in the 81st percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 29879. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (0% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (-0.3%), AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (-0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (0.6%). The GPU ranks in the 57th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 15171. The combination's 2500th place ranking out of 3716 suggests that while both components are individually solid, many other tested systems pair higher-end GPUs with this class of CPU.
The ranking should be interpreted with context. Inside is not a demanding title by modern standards, and the measured frame rates demonstrate that this combo exceeds the requirements for smooth gameplay. The 2500th rank reflects the breadth of the database rather than any deficiency in this pairing. For a game released in 2016, this combination provides more than enough performance for an excellent experience, with headroom for future titles that may be more demanding.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured results show a clear hierarchy across settings. Low produces 282 FPS average, Medium produces 226 FPS (minimum 192, maximum 259), High produces 141 FPS, and Ultra produces 134 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium costs 56 FPS (20% reduction), while the jump from Medium to High costs 85 FPS (38% reduction). The difference between High and Ultra is minimal at just 7 FPS (5% reduction), suggesting that the Ultra preset offers little additional visual benefit for the performance cost.
At 2560x1440, the results follow a similar pattern. Low achieves 203 FPS average, Medium achieves 162 FPS (minimum 138, maximum 186), High achieves 101 FPS, and Ultra achieves 97 FPS. The transition from Low to Medium reduces performance by 41 FPS (20%), while Medium to High reduces performance by 61 FPS (38%). High to Ultra costs only 4 FPS (4%), again indicating diminishing returns at the highest settings.
At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its limits. Low delivers 127 FPS average, Medium delivers 102 FPS (minimum 87, maximum 117), High delivers 64 FPS, and Ultra delivers 61 FPS. The Medium to High transition is the most significant drop, costing 38 FPS (37% reduction). The High to Ultra difference is just 3 FPS (5%), mirroring the pattern seen at lower resolutions.
The data reveals that the Medium preset provides the most consistent experience across all resolutions. At 1080p, the minimum of 192 FPS ensures no perceptible stutter. At 1440p, the minimum of 138 FPS stays above the 120 Hz threshold. At 4K, the minimum of 87 FPS remains comfortably playable. The High and Ultra presets, while playable at 1440p and below, struggle to maintain high refresh rates at 4K.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K varies by settings preset, revealing the scaling characteristics of this combination. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 282 at 1080p to 203 at 1440p (28% reduction) and then to 127 at 4K (37% reduction from 1440p). The total drop from 1080p to 4K at Low is 155 FPS, representing a 55% reduction.
At Medium settings, the progression is from 226 FPS at 1080p to 162 FPS at 1440p (28% reduction) and then to 102 FPS at 4K (37% reduction from 1440p). The total reduction is 124 FPS, or 55%. This consistent percentage drop across presets indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor, as resolution scaling affects pixel count uniformly regardless of settings.
At High settings, the drop is more pronounced. From 1080p (141 FPS) to 1440p (101 FPS) represents a 28% reduction, but from 1440p to 4K (64 FPS) represents a 37% reduction. The total drop is 77 FPS (55%). Ultra settings show similar scaling: 134 FPS at 1080p, 97 FPS at 1440p (28% reduction), and 61 FPS at 4K (37% reduction from 1440p).
The proportional scaling across all presets strongly suggests that the GPU is the primary bottleneck when moving to higher resolutions. The CPU has sufficient headroom to maintain frame rates, as evidenced by the 282 FPS result at 1080p Low, which is far above what most displays can show. The consistent 55% total reduction from 1080p to 4K indicates that the RX 7600's rendering capabilities scale predictably with pixel count, with no unexpected performance cliffs or thermal throttling observed in the data.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT provides 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The CPU features 32 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel configuration. Its benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 and single-core score of 3359.
In Inside, the CPU's role is secondary to the GPU, as the game is primarily graphics-bound. The 1080p Low result of 282 FPS demonstrates that the CPU can feed the GPU with data faster than the graphics card can render frames. The 16 threads provide ample parallelism for any game logic or physics calculations, though a Puzzle Platformer like Inside is unlikely to stress even a quad-core processor.
The CPU's single-thread performance, measured at 959 in 3DMark single-thread and 338 in Cinebench R15 single-core, is more relevant for this title. Inside relies on consistent frame pacing and responsive input, which benefit from strong single-core performance. The 5800XT's boost clock of 4.80 GHz ensures that the main game thread has access to high-frequency execution, minimizing any potential CPU-induced frame time spikes.
The CPU's 81st percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 29879 place it ahead of 4 out of 5 processors in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, matches its average score exactly (0% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is 0.6% ahead. This level of CPU performance is more than sufficient for Inside, as evidenced by the fact that resolution scaling (which increases GPU load) has a consistent impact on FPS while the CPU remains underutilized. The data indicates that users could pair this CPU with a more powerful GPU for higher resolution gaming without encountering a CPU bottleneck.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
AMD Radeon RX 7600
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in Inside
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 127.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 102.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 61.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 203.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 162.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 101.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 97.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 282.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 226.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 141.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 134.0 |
Inside with Ryzen 7 5800XT + Other GPUs
See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Inside with RX 7600 + Other CPUs
See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800XT + RX 7600
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.