Inside

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer that is not graphically demanding by modern standards. Across all tested resolutions and presets, the average frame rate never drops below 63 FPS, indicating a highly playable experience even at 4K with maximum settings. The data shows a system that is more than capable of handling this title with significant headroom, making the limiting factor heavily dependent on the specific resolution and quality preset chosen.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic pattern of GPU-bound behavior at higher resolutions, with the CPU having ample headroom to feed the graphics card. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces an average of 292 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 210 FPS, a 28% reduction, and then to 132 FPS at 4K Low, a further 37% reduction from the 1440p result. This steep decline as pixel count increases strongly indicates that the RX 6650 XT is the primary bottleneck at these settings, as the workload scales directly with resolution.

The trend holds across all presets but becomes more pronounced with higher quality settings. For High settings, the average frame rate falls from 146 FPS at 1080p to 105 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 66 FPS at 4K. This represents a 55% drop from 1080p to 4K. The Ultra preset shows a similar pattern, with 139 FPS at 1080p, 100 FPS at 1440p, and 63 FPS at 4K. The scaling between 1440p and 4K is particularly steep, with High and Ultra presets losing roughly 37% of their performance, whereas the drop from 1080p to 1440p is a more moderate 28-30%.

This data suggests that at 1080p and 1440p, the system is not fully GPU-limited, as the frame rates are so high that other factors, such as draw call overhead or engine limits, may begin to play a role. However, the consistent and significant drops at 4K across all presets confirm that the GPU is the definitive limiting component at that resolution. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is clearly not the constraint, as even the most demanding preset at 1080p yields nearly 140 FPS, a figure that would strain many older processors.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is the central figure in these results, and its specifications align with the observed performance scaling. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s. For a game like Inside, which uses a muted, monochromatic art style and relatively simple geometry, this memory configuration is more than sufficient. The 8 GB frame buffer does not appear to be a limiting factor at any of the tested settings, as even at 4K Ultra, the average frame rate only dips to 63 FPS, indicating the memory capacity is not being exhausted.

The GPU's clock speeds are notably high, with a base clock of 2055 MHz, a game clock of 2410 MHz, and a boost clock of 2635 MHz. These high frequencies are a hallmark of the RDNA 2 architecture and contribute directly to the raw throughput that allows for such high frame rates. The card also has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, which are all kept busy by the game's rendering workload. The pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s are ample for a title that is not pushing complex shaders or high-resolution textures.

The benchmark results for the GPU show a Passmark G3D score of 17166, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score include professional workstation cards like the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and AMD FirePro W7000, though these are not directly comparable in gaming performance. The RX 6650 XT's performance in Inside is clearly strong, but the data suggests that at 4K with High or Ultra settings, it is operating near its practical limit for maintaining a 60+ FPS average. The 4K Low and Medium results, at 132 and 106 FPS respectively, show that the card has significant headroom when the graphical load is reduced.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows provide clear guidance for optimal settings, balancing visual fidelity with the high refresh rate potential of this hardware. For users with a 1080p display, the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation. The average frame rate of 139 FPS is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a smooth experience on standard displays. The jump from High to Ultra at 1080p is only a 7 FPS difference (146 to 139), making the extra visual quality essentially free in performance terms.

At 1440p, the Ultra preset still delivers an average of 100 FPS, which is excellent for a high-refresh-rate monitor. However, for those seeking the absolute maximum frame rates, the High preset at 105 FPS is nearly identical in performance, suggesting that the visual difference between High and Ultra at this resolution is not worth even the minor performance cost. The Medium preset at 1440p yields 168 FPS, which would be ideal for a 165 Hz or 170 Hz display, but the visual downgrade from High may be noticeable.

The 4K resolution presents a more nuanced decision. The Ultra preset averages 63 FPS, which is right at the edge of the 60 FPS standard for console-like smoothness. This is playable but leaves no headroom for demanding scenes. The High preset at 66 FPS offers a similar situation. For a more comfortable margin, the Medium preset at 106 FPS is the sweet spot at 4K, providing a substantial performance buffer while still maintaining good visual quality. The Low preset at 132 FPS is excessive for most 4K displays, which typically max out at 60 Hz or 120 Hz, and the visual compromise is not necessary. The data suggests that for a locked 60 FPS experience at 4K, Medium is the safest choice, while High or Ultra are viable for those who prioritize image quality over a strict frame rate target.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 4K with High settings?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Radeon RX 6650 XT combo produces an average of 66 FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How much faster is the system at 1080p compared to 4K on the Medium preset?

A: At 1080p Medium, the average frame rate is 234 FPS, while at 4K Medium it drops to 106 FPS. This represents a 128 FPS difference, or roughly a 55% reduction in performance when moving to the higher resolution.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the bottleneck in this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. The frame rate drops significantly with increasing resolution (from 292 FPS at 1080p Low to 132 FPS at 4K Low), which is a characteristic of GPU-bound performance. The 8-core CPU appears to have ample headroom.

Q: Can this system achieve a stable 60 FPS at 4K with maximum settings?

A: Yes, but barely. The average frame rate at 4K with Ultra settings is 63 FPS. While the average is above 60, the lack of a reported minimum frame rate for this preset means there is no guarantee against occasional dips below the target.

Q: What is the performance difference between the High and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: The difference is minimal. The High preset averages 105 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 100 FPS. This 5 FPS difference suggests that the visual upgrade to Ultra is nearly free in performance terms at this resolution.

Q: What is the best preset for a 1440p high-refresh-rate monitor?

A: For a 144 Hz or 165 Hz display, the Medium preset at 168 FPS is the best fit, as it is the highest quality preset that consistently exceeds the monitor's refresh rate. The High preset at 105 FPS would also work well for a 100 Hz or 120 Hz display.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT ranks 2378 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places the system in the 36th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning that roughly two-thirds of the tested combos deliver higher average frame rates in this specific game. This ranking is somewhat surprising given the high absolute frame rates achieved, but it must be contextualized by the fact that Inside is a lightweight title that can be run at very high speeds by even modest hardware.

The ranking suggests that there are many combinations of higher-end CPUs and GPUs that can push the frame rate even higher, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU becomes more relevant. For instance, the CPU's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H and Intel Xeon D-2752TER, have similar average benchmark scores, but a more powerful GPU would likely yield higher scores in this game. The combo's rank of 2378 indicates that while the performance is perfectly playable and even excellent for most users, it is not at the top tier for this title.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 65th for all GPUs, combined with the CPU's 78th percentile ranking, suggests a system that is well-balanced but not extreme. The relatively low rank in Inside is likely due to the fact that the game is so undemanding that even mid-range components from newer generations can achieve frame rates in the hundreds, pushing the RX 6650 XT's results down the list. For a user with a standard 60 Hz or 144 Hz monitor, this ranking is irrelevant, as the system delivers a flawless experience, but for those chasing the absolute highest frame rates in competitive benchmarking, there is significant headroom for improvement.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 plays a supporting role in these results, providing a robust foundation that ensures the GPU is never starved of data. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, the CPU offers substantial multi-threaded capability. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz are competitive, and the 16 MB of L3 cache helps reduce memory latency. The CPU's benchmark results, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655 and a single-core score of 2916, demonstrate strong performance that is more than adequate for gaming.

In the context of Inside, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and draw calls, which are not particularly demanding for a 2016 puzzle platformer. The data shows that the CPU is not the bottleneck at any resolution. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 292 FPS, which is a frame rate that would challenge even the fastest CPUs in more complex titles. The fact that the frame rate scales down so consistently with resolution points to the GPU being the limiting factor, not the CPU.

The CPU's 65-watt TDP and 7 nm process node make it an efficient choice, and its performance in synthetic benchmarks places it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, show that it is competitive with other mid-range and mobile parts. For Inside, the Ryzen 7 5700 provides more than enough processing power, and the results would likely be identical with a weaker CPU, as the GPU is the clear constraint at higher resolutions. The high frame rates at 1080p, however, do indicate that the CPU is capable of handling very high input rates without becoming a limiting factor, ensuring a smooth and responsive experience.