Inside

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pairing delivers a highly capable Inside experience, with benchmark data showing that the system’s performance is heavily dictated by resolution and the selected graphics preset. The measured results indicate that this combo is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and remains very playable at 1440p, though it begins to show its limits at 4K Ultra settings. The data places this combination at rank 2966 out of 3716 tested combos, putting it in the lower half of the database but still within a workable range for this specific title.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, built on a 7 nm process. It carries a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with 32 MB of shared L3 cache. For a puzzle-platformer like Inside, the CPU’s role is less about raw multi-threaded muscle and more about maintaining consistent frame pacing and ensuring the GPU is fed with data. The processor’s single-thread performance, as measured by benchmarks, shows a 3dmark_single_thread score of 696 and a passmark_single_thread score of 2562, which are the relevant metrics for a game engine that typically relies on one or two primary threads for game logic and physics.

Looking at the CPU’s broader benchmark profile, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 15045 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2124 in single-core, indicating a solid balance for a 65 W TDP part. In the context of Inside’s measured FPS, the CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 234 avg FPS, and at 2560x1440 Low it hits 184 avg FPS. These numbers suggest that even at lower graphical settings, where the GPU workload drops, the CPU has enough headroom to push frames well beyond typical display refresh rates. The processor’s 12 threads and 4.20 GHz boost clock provide ample capacity for the game’s physics calculations, which in a puzzle-platformer involve object interactions and environmental dynamics rather than complex AI or simulation workloads.

The Ryzen 5 3600 sits at the 71st percentile when compared to all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17035. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-1260P (17007, +0.2% delta) and the Intel Core i5-11400 (17067, -0.2% delta), showing that the AMD chip is essentially performance-equivalent to those parts. For Inside, the CPU’s capability is more than sufficient, since even the most demanding measured scenario—4K Ultra at 55 avg FPS—is far more likely to be GPU-limited than CPU-limited. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration also ensures that background processes or streaming software will not interfere with frame delivery, though the game itself is light enough that even a quad-core would likely suffice.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is built on the Turing architecture with the TU106 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. The GPU’s boost clock is rated at 1680 MHz, and it packs 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. For Inside, the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences between settings, as the game’s visual style—monochromatic silhouettes with atmospheric lighting—puts a moderate load on the rasterization pipeline. The 6 GB VRAM is not a limiting factor at any measured setting, as the game’s textures and effects are not particularly demanding.

The RTX 2060’s benchmark scores show a passmark_g3d score of 14111 and a 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 1242, placing it at the 58th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (15283, 0% delta) and the AMD Radeon 680M (15270, +0.1% delta), which indicates that the RTX 2060 is positioned in a performance tier that is more than adequate for a 2016 puzzle-platformer. The GPU’s 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are more than enough for Inside’s relatively simple texture sets and shader work, allowing the card to deliver high frame rates without memory-related stutters.

The measured FPS data shows clear scaling across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the RTX 2060 produces 122 avg FPS on Ultra, 128 on High, 205 on Medium, and 234 on Low. This indicates that the GPU is highly capable at 1080p, with even the most demanding preset comfortably exceeding 60 FPS. At 2560x1440, the card manages 88 avg FPS on Ultra and 92 on High, which remains playable for a slower-paced puzzle game. At 3840x2160, the RTX 2060 starts to show its limits, dropping to 55 avg FPS on Ultra and 58 on High, though the Medium preset recovers to 93 avg FPS. The GPU’s 160 W TDP and dual-slot design mean it can sustain these loads without thermal issues, provided the system has adequate airflow.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Inside?

A: The measured data shows that 1920x1080 is the sweet spot, with all presets exceeding 120 avg FPS. At 2560x1440, the combo remains playable with 88 avg FPS on Ultra, while 3840x2160 drops to 55 avg FPS on Ultra, which is borderline for smooth gameplay.

Q: How much performance difference is there between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 234 avg FPS, while Ultra achieves 122 avg FPS. This represents a 112 FPS difference, meaning Low is roughly 92% faster than Ultra at this resolution.

Q: Is the RTX 2060's 6 GB VRAM sufficient for Inside?

A: Yes, the data shows no VRAM-related performance issues. The GPU maintains consistent frame rates across all settings, and the 6 GB GDDR6 memory with 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is more than adequate for this game’s texture and geometry requirements.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Inside?

A: At 3840x2160, the combo achieves 58 avg FPS on High and 55 avg FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset reaches 93 avg FPS, so 4K is playable if you lower settings to Medium or High, but Ultra will dip below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 3600 compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 3600 has an average benchmark score of 17035, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-1260P (17007, +0.2% delta) and the Intel Core i5-11400 (17067, -0.2% delta). In Inside, this means CPU performance is effectively a non-factor for frame rate differences.

Q: What is the combo's ranking among all tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 2966 out of 3716 tested combinations, placing it in the lower 20% of all systems. However, this ranking is based on average performance across all games, and for Inside specifically, the measured FPS shows it handles the game very well at common resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the High preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance for most users. At 1920x1080, High delivers 128 avg FPS, which is smooth on any display. At 2560x1440, High provides 92 avg FPS, remaining fluid for the game’s deliberate pacing. Even at 3840x2160, High achieves 58 avg FPS, which is close to the 60 FPS target and likely acceptable given Inside’s slower gameplay.

For users with high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p, the Medium preset is an interesting choice, delivering 205 avg FPS with a minimum of 174 FPS and a maximum of 236 FPS. This preset provides a significant frame rate boost over High (128 avg) while likely retaining most of the visual fidelity that matters in Inside’s atmospheric presentation. The Low preset at 234 avg FPS is only marginally faster than Medium, so the visual trade-off is probably not worth the extra 29 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset (147 avg FPS) is the best option for users who want high frame rates, as it offers a 60% improvement over High (92 avg) while still maintaining a 125 FPS minimum. For 4K users, the Medium preset (93 avg FPS) is the only sensible choice, as High and Ultra both dip below the 60 FPS mark. The Ultra preset, which achieves 122 avg FPS at 1080p and 88 at 1440p, is only recommended for users who prioritize maximum visual settings over frame rate consistency, as the differences from High are likely subtle in this art style.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2966 out of 3716 tested combinations places this system in the 20th percentile overall, which might seem low at first glance. However, this ranking is calculated across all games and workloads in the database, meaning it reflects the system’s average performance relative to every other tested combo, including those with far more powerful CPUs and GPUs. For a mid-range pairing from 2019, this position is not surprising, as newer and higher-end components will dominate the upper ranks.

Within the context of Inside specifically, the measured FPS data tells a more favorable story. The system achieves 128 avg FPS at 1080p High and 92 at 1440p High, which are strong results for a puzzle-platformer that does not demand extreme hardware. The ranking is more indicative of the system’s limitations in other, more demanding titles rather than its suitability for Inside. The RTX 2060’s 58th percentile GPU ranking and the Ryzen 5 3600’s 71st percentile CPU ranking suggest a well-matched pair, with the CPU slightly outpacing the GPU in relative terms. This means the GPU is likely the primary limiter when frame rates drop, but only at 4K Ultra where the 55 avg FPS reflects the card’s rasterization limits.

Compared to other combos in the database, this system sits in the lower half, but it is important to note that the database includes many configurations with flagships like the RTX 4090 or Ryzen 9 7950X. For a 1080p or 1440p gaming setup, this ranking is acceptable, and the measured FPS in Inside confirms that the hardware is more than adequate for this genre. Users upgrading from older hardware will find this combo offers a significant performance uplift, while those seeking 4K Ultra at 60 FPS will need to look at higher-tier GPUs.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. The Low preset achieves 234 avg FPS, which is the highest measured frame rate across all resolutions and settings. Medium follows closely with 205 avg FPS, accompanied by a minimum of 174 and a maximum of 236. High and Ultra presets produce 128 and 122 avg FPS respectively, both remaining well above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that even the most demanding 1080p preset runs at nearly double the refresh rate of a standard 60 Hz monitor, making this an excellent resolution for high-refresh-rate displays.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. Low settings yield 184 avg FPS, while Medium achieves 147 avg FPS with a minimum of 125 and a maximum of 169. High and Ultra presets drop to 92 and 88 avg FPS respectively, still comfortably playable for a game that does not require twitch reflexes. The 1440p results suggest that users can choose between smooth 90+ FPS on High or 147 FPS on Medium, depending on their preference for visual effects versus frame rate headroom.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 2060 begins to struggle with the higher resolution. Low settings still produce a respectable 116 avg FPS, and Medium delivers 93 avg FPS with a minimum of 79 and a maximum of 106. However, High and Ultra presets fall to 58 and 55 avg FPS respectively, dipping below the 60 FPS threshold. For 4K users, the Medium preset is the clear choice, offering 93 avg FPS which is smooth enough for the game’s cinematic pacing, while High and Ultra provide a marginal visual improvement at the cost of significant frame rate reductions. The overall pattern across all resolutions shows that the Medium preset offers the most consistent performance, with the tightest min-max range relative to its average, making it the recommended setting for users who want a balanced experience.