Fivem
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 71 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 26 | 33 | 42 | 53 |
| 1440p QHD | 47 | 60 | 75 | 96 |
| 1080p Full HD | 71 | 92 | 115 | 145 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 combination delivers a solid 1080p experience in Fivem, with performance that scales predictably across resolutions. This pairing ranks in the lower-mid tier of tested configurations, and the data reveals a system where the GPU becomes the primary constraint as resolution increases, while the CPU holds its own at lower settings.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?
A: The measured data shows 1920x1080 is the sweet spot. At 1080p, the combo achieves 92 FPS on High and 145 FPS on Low, while at 2560x1440, High drops to 60 FPS and Low to 96 FPS. At 4K, even Low settings only reach 53 FPS.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 3600 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 17035, which places it 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-1260P (17007) and the AMD EPYC 7742 (16998), and 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-11400 (17067) and AMD EPYC 7573X (17070). It ranks in the 71st percentile of all CPUs.
Q: What is the RTX 2060's position relative to other GPUs?
A: The GPU scores 15290 on average, which is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (15283, 0% delta) and the AMD Radeon 680M (15270, 0.1% ahead). It sits 0.6% behind the RTX 3050 OEM and 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7600, placing it in the 58th percentile.
Q: What are the best settings for 1440p gameplay?
A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers 75 FPS average with a minimum of 64 FPS and maximum of 87 FPS. This is the only 1440p setting that maintains a playable frame rate above 60 FPS, as High only reaches 60 FPS and Ultra drops to 47 FPS.
Q: How much does the combo rank among all tested systems?
A: This pairing ranks 2911 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the lower third of all combinations. The data shows it is a capable but not top-tier configuration for this game.
Q: Is the 1080p Low setting the most performant option?
A: Yes, at 1920x1080 Low, the combo achieves 145 FPS average, which is the highest measured result across all resolutions and settings. However, this comes at the cost of visual fidelity, and the High preset still provides a strong 92 FPS.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Zen 2 architecture, running at a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. It features 32 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU's benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performance, with a 3DMark max-thread score of 4603 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15045, while single-thread performance is more modest at 696 in 3DMark single-thread and 2124 in Cinebench R23.
In Fivem, the CPU's role becomes apparent when examining the frame rate scaling at 1080p. At 1920x1080 Low, the system produces 145 FPS, which suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to reach high frame rates. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 4605 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 17700 indicate that the 3600 handles multi-threaded workloads well, which is relevant for a multiplayer game like Fivem where server-side simulation and player interactions can create additional CPU load. The single-thread score of 696 in 3DMark is lower, but the data shows that at 1080p Low, the CPU is not the limiting factor, as the frame rate is higher than at any other resolution.
The CPU's percentile rank of 71 against all CPUs, combined with its 0.2% delta against rivals like the Intel Core i5-11400 and Intel Core i7-1260P, shows it is a mid-range performer. In the context of Fivem, the 3600's 6 cores and 12 threads provide sufficient processing power to avoid bottlenecking the RTX 2060 at lower resolutions, but the system's overall rank of 2911 out of 3707 combos suggests that the CPU is not the primary strength of this pairing.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is built on the Turing architecture with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock is 1365 MHz with a boost clock of 1680 MHz, and it has 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The GPU's benchmark scores show a PassMark G3D score of 14111 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 65846, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs.
The GPU's role in Fivem is clearly visible when examining the performance drop from 1080p to 4K. At 1920x1080 High, the combo produces 92 FPS, but at 2560x1440 High, this drops to 60 FPS, and at 3840x2160 High, it falls to 33 FPS. This pattern indicates that the RTX 2060's 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 680M (0.1% ahead) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (0% delta), which shows that the RTX 2060 is an older mid-range card that struggles with modern titles at high resolutions.
At 1080p, the GPU is the dominant factor in determining performance. The difference between Low (145 FPS) and Ultra (71 FPS) at 1920x1080 is 74 FPS, illustrating how much the GPU's rendering workload increases with quality settings. The GPU's 12 nm process and 160 W TDP are modest by modern standards, and the data shows that the RTX 2060 is better suited for 1080p gaming, where it can maintain high frame rates, rather than 1440p or 4K, where it falls below playable thresholds on higher settings.
How This Combo Ranks
This AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 combination ranks 2911 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 78th percentile from the bottom or the 22nd percentile from the top. This is a low-mid tier ranking, indicating that the system is far from the best performers but is not at the very bottom either. The CPU's 71st percentile rank and the GPU's 58th percentile rank are both below average, which explains the combo's overall position.
The data suggests that this pairing is limited by both components, but the GPU is the more significant bottleneck at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the combo achieves playable frame rates on all settings, with the lowest being 71 FPS on Ultra. However, at 1440p, only Medium (75 FPS) and Low (96 FPS) remain above 60 FPS, and at 4K, even Low settings only reach 53 FPS. This ranking reflects a system that is adequate for 1080p gaming but struggles to maintain smooth performance at higher resolutions.
Comparing to other tested combos, the CPU's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-11400 and Intel Core i7-1260P, are within 0.2% in average score, suggesting that the CPU is not uniquely weak or strong. The GPU's rivals, including the AMD Radeon 680M and RTX 3050 OEM, are also closely matched. The combo's rank is therefore a result of the combination's overall performance, which is below the median of all tested systems.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the recommended settings depend on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, the High preset provides the best balance of visual quality and performance, with an average of 92 FPS. The Medium preset offers 115 FPS, which is smoother but less visually detailed, while Ultra drops to 71 FPS, which is still playable but may not be worth the performance cost. Low settings at 145 FPS are only recommended for competitive play where maximum frame rate is paramount.
For 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the only setting that consistently delivers above 60 FPS, with an average of 75 FPS and a minimum of 64 FPS. High settings at exactly 60 FPS are borderline, and Ultra at 47 FPS is not recommended for smooth gameplay. Low settings at 96 FPS are viable but sacrifice visual quality significantly. At 3840x2160, no setting achieves 60 FPS, with the best being Low at 53 FPS, so this resolution is not recommended for this combo.
The data indicates that the Medium preset at 1080p or 1440p offers the most consistent experience, as it is the only setting with reported minimum and maximum FPS values, showing a stable frame rate range. At 1080p Medium, the range is 97-132 FPS, and at 1440p Medium, it is 64-87 FPS. These ranges suggest that Medium is the most predictable setting for maintaining a smooth experience.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers an average FPS of 145 on Low, 115 on Medium (with a min of 97 and max of 132), 92 on High, and 71 on Ultra. This shows a clear scaling pattern where each step up in settings reduces performance by approximately 20-25 FPS. The 1080p Medium data is the only measured row with min/max values, indicating a stable frame rate range.
At 2560x1440, the average FPS is 96 on Low, 75 on Medium (min 64, max 87), 60 on High, and 47 on Ultra. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant, with High settings losing 32 FPS (from 92 to 60) and Low settings losing 49 FPS (from 145 to 96). This highlights the GPU's increasing load at higher resolutions.
At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops to 53 on Low, 42 on Medium (min 36, max 48), 33 on High, and 26 on Ultra. These values are all below the 60 FPS threshold, making 4K gaming impractical for this combo. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 27 FPS, showing that even reducing settings to minimum cannot bring the frame rate to a playable level.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the limiting component of this system. At 1080p High, the average FPS is 92; at 1440p High, it drops to 60 (a 34.8% decrease); and at 4K High, it falls to 33 (a 64.1% decrease from 1080p). This pattern is consistent across all settings, with Low settings dropping from 145 FPS at 1080p to 96 FPS at 1440p (33.8% decrease) and 53 FPS at 4K (63.4% decrease).
The data shows that the frame rate drop is roughly proportional to the increase in pixel count, which indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The RTX 2060's 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to handle the increased rendering load at 1440p and 4K, causing the significant performance degradation. In contrast, the CPU's performance remains relatively constant, as the Ryzen 5 3600's multi-threaded capabilities are not as heavily taxed by resolution increases.
At 1080p, the system is more balanced, as the CPU can feed the GPU effectively, resulting in high frame rates. However, the data suggests that even at 1080p, the GPU is the limiting factor at higher settings, as the difference between Low (145 FPS) and Ultra (71 FPS) is 74 FPS, which is more than a 50% reduction. This indicates that the RTX 2060 is the component that determines the system's overall performance ceiling in Fivem, while the Ryzen 5 3600 provides adequate support without becoming a significant bottleneck at any resolution.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 53.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 42.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 33.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 26.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 96.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 75.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 60.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 47.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 145.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 115.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 92.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 71.0 |
Fivem with Ryzen 5 3600 + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 3600 + RTX 2060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.