Inside

# Inside: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

This combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 lands at rank 1400 out of 1671 tested combos for Inside, placing it in the lower third of all tested systems. The ranking is surprisingly modest given how well this game runs on the hardware, which suggests that the benchmark database includes many far more powerful modern configurations. What matters more than the raw rank is the measured frame rate data, which tells a story of a pairing that handles this puzzle platformer with ample headroom at every resolution, though the nature of that headroom shifts meaningfully as settings and resolution change.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 1400 out of 1671 places this system in roughly the 16th percentile of all tested configurations for Inside. That low rank is not a reflection of poor playability — the measured FPS data shows this pairing never dips below 50.4 FPS at any tested setting — but rather indicates the benchmark pool is dominated by newer, higher-end hardware. The Ryzen 5 3600 itself sits at the 76th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18129, while the GTX 1070 sits at the 51st percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 12331. The GPU being near the median of all GPUs while the CPU is in the upper quartile suggests this combo is held back more by the graphics card in most scenarios, yet in Inside the game is light enough that even the GPU's mid-pack standing delivers excellent results. The delta between this pairing's rank and what the raw numbers imply about its capability points to the game's low system requirements being the great equalizer.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Inside?*

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system produces 231.1 FPS, while at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings it drops to 50.4 FPS. Both are playable, but the sweet spot for smooth 60+ FPS gameplay extends all the way up to 1440p at High settings, which yields 82.8 FPS.

Q: How does the GTX 1070 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GTX 1070 has an average benchmark score of 12331, which is 0.7% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro K4200's 12241, 1.3% higher than the GeForce GTX 880M's 12490, 1.4% higher than the GTX 1650 SUPER's 12504, and 1.7% higher than the Tesla K20Xm's 12547. The deltaPct values show it is essentially on par with these cards.

Q: What is the CPU's performance relative to its closest competitors?

A: The Ryzen 5 3600 scores 18129 on average, which is 0.1% below the Intel Core i5-11400's 18150, 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS's 18101, 0.2% below the Ryzen 5 1600's 18158, and 0.3% below the AMD EPYC 9274F's 18189. These deltaPct values indicate near-identical performance among all four.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Inside?*

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with High settings the system averages 51.2 FPS, and with Low settings it reaches 104.1 FPS. Ultra settings at 4K drop to 50.4 FPS, which is still playable but below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the GPU's memory configuration affect performance?

A: The GTX 1070 has 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus with 256.3 GB/s bandwidth. For a puzzle platformer like Inside, this capacity is far beyond what the game requires, which is reflected in the high frame rates even at 4K.

Q: What is the CPU's multithreaded capability?

A: The Ryzen 5 3600 has 6 cores and 12 threads with a 3.60 GHz base clock and 4.20 GHz boost. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 15045, while the single-core score is 2124, showing strong multithreaded performance for a 65 W TDP part.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent scaling pattern as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces 231.1 FPS, which drops to 166 FPS at 1440p (a 28.2% decrease) and further to 104.1 FPS at 4K (a 37.3% decrease from 1440p). This steep drop-off across resolutions indicates the GTX 1070 is the limiting factor — the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames, but the GPU's pixel throughput becomes the bottleneck as pixel count rises. The scaling is less dramatic at higher settings: with Ultra settings, the system goes from 107.4 FPS at 1080p to 77.4 FPS at 1440p (27.9% drop) and then to 50.4 FPS at 4K (34.9% drop). The near-consistent percentage drops across settings suggest the game's rendering load scales predictably with resolution, and the GPU's 256.3 GB/s memory bandwidth and 6.463 TFLOPS FP32 compute are the primary constraints. At 1080p, even Ultra settings stay above 100 FPS, which confirms the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions — the Ryzen 5 3600's 12 threads and 4.20 GHz boost clock are more than sufficient for this game's physics and logic.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers 231.1 FPS on Low, 185.9 FPS on Medium, 114.7 FPS on High, and 107.4 FPS on Ultra. The jump from Low to Medium costs 45.2 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs only 7.3 FPS, indicating diminishing returns at the top end. At 2560x1440, the numbers are 166 FPS on Low, 132.7 FPS on Medium, 82.8 FPS on High, and 77.4 FPS on Ultra. The gap between High and Ultra narrows to 5.4 FPS at this resolution. At 3840x2160, the system produces 104.1 FPS on Low, 84.7 FPS on Medium, 51.2 FPS on High, and 50.4 FPS on Ultra. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is just 0.8 FPS, showing that these two presets are nearly identical in workload at this resolution. Across all resolutions, the scaling from Low to Ultra ranges from a 53.5% performance hit at 1080p to a 51.6% hit at 4K, demonstrating consistent behavior regardless of resolution.

Settings Recommendations

The data points to High settings as the optimal choice for most users. At 1080p, High yields 114.7 FPS compared to Ultra's 107.4 FPS — a mere 6.8% difference — while the visual upgrade from High to Ultra is typically minimal in a game with this art style. At 1440p, High produces 82.8 FPS versus Ultra's 77.4 FPS, and at 4K, High gives 51.2 FPS versus Ultra's 50.4 FPS. In all cases, High offers a measurable FPS advantage with virtually no visual penalty. For users prioritizing maximum frame rates, Low settings at 1080p deliver 231.1 FPS, which would fully utilize a 144 Hz or even 240 Hz display. Medium settings provide a middle ground with 185.9 FPS at 1080p and 132.7 FPS at 1440p, making it the best choice for high-refresh 1440p monitors. The 4K Ultra setting at 50.4 FPS is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, so users with 4K displays should stick to High for a playable experience.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 3600's 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 2 architecture on a 7 nm process, provide substantial processing power for a game like Inside. With a base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.20 GHz, the CPU demonstrates strong single-thread performance — its 3DMark single-thread score is 696, and Cinebench R23 single-core is 2124. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps with data locality, which is beneficial for the game's physics calculations. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 17700 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15045 indicate it has far more compute capability than Inside requires. This is confirmed by the FPS data: at 1080p Low, the system reaches 231.1 FPS, a frame rate that would be impossible if the CPU were a limiting factor. Even at 4K Ultra, where the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, the CPU maintains frame delivery at 50.4 FPS without dropping below playable levels. The CPU's 65 W TDP and DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth are more than adequate for this workload.

GPU Role

The GTX 1070, built on the Pascal architecture with a 16 nm process, is the defining component for Inside's performance ceiling. Its 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus with 256.3 GB/s bandwidth provides ample memory bandwidth for 4K textures, while the 1920 shading units and 64 ROPs deliver 6.463 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 107.7 GPixel/s pixel rate. The GPU's clock speeds of 1506 MHz base and 1683 MHz boost are modest by modern standards, yet the measured FPS data shows it handles Inside with ease. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 13498 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 47395 place it near the median of all GPUs, yet its performance in this game exceeds what those scores might suggest. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at the same settings shows the GPU's pixel throughput becoming the limiting factor — the 231.1 FPS at 1080p Low drops to 104.1 FPS at 4K Low, a 55% reduction that aligns with the 4x increase in pixel count. The GPU's DirectX 12 support (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure it can take advantage of modern rendering APIs, though Inside is not a graphically demanding title. The 150 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU indicate the card is power-efficient for its performance class, and its end-of-life production status means it remains a viable option for older titles like this one.