Hitman 2
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 33 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 10 | 14 | 19 | 25 |
| 1440p QHD | 19 | 26 | 35 | 46 |
| 1080p Full HD | 30 | 41 | 54 | 73 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Hitman 2 with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + Intel Arc B370, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the Intel Arc B370 produces a combination that is fundamentally limited by its graphics component in Hitman 2. The data shows a processor with top-tier synthetic scores paired with a GPU whose benchmark percentile is in the lowest tier. This results in a system that can achieve playable frame rates at 1080p Low, but struggles severely at higher resolutions and graphical presets. The combo ranks 2768 out of 3001 tested configurations, placing it in the bottom 8% of all tested combos for this title.
FAQ
Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in Hitman 2?
A: The combination ranks 2768th out of 3001 tested combos, placing it in the bottom percentile of configurations for this game. This indicates a severe performance bottleneck that limits the experience to the lowest settings and resolutions.
Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the primary bottleneck in this pairing?
A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck. The Intel Arc B370 has a percentile rank of 5 against all GPUs, with its nearest rivals being the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and the ATI Radeon HD 5770. In contrast, the Ryzen 5 7500F has a percentile rank of 77 against all CPUs, making the performance disparity immense.
Q: Can this combo run Hitman 2 at 1920x1080 resolution?
A: Yes, but only at the Low preset does it achieve a comfortable average frame rate of 73 FPS. At Medium, the average drops to 54 FPS, and at High it falls to 41 FPS. The Ultra preset is not viable, with an average of just 30 FPS.
Q: What kind of frame rates can be expected at 2560x1440 resolution?
A: Performance is marginal at this resolution. The Low preset yields an average of 46 FPS, which is playable, but the Medium preset drops to 35 FPS. High and Ultra presets are not recommended, with averages of 26 and 19 FPS respectively.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500F's processing power compare to its closest rivals?
A: The processor's average benchmark score is 24964, which is virtually identical to its nearest rivals. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, showing that its computing power is on par with those other chips.
Q: What is the most demanding setting tested for this combo?
A: The most demanding configuration tested was 3840x2160 resolution with the Ultra preset, which produced an average frame rate of only 10 FPS. This is the lowest performance point in the measured data and confirms the GPU's inability to handle high-resolution rendering.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and it operates within a 65 W TDP. This is a modern, capable desktop processor that provides a strong foundation for a gaming system.
In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates significant strength. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 22799, and its single-core score is 3218. The Geekbench multi-core score is 12362, with a single-core score of 2374. These scores indicate that the processor has ample headroom for demanding workloads, including gaming.
The data shows the processor's performance is squarely in the mid-to-high range. Its average benchmark score of 24964 places it at the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals are all within a fraction of a percent of its score. For example, it is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H. This demonstrates that the 7500F is a well-balanced chip that will not be a limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.
However, in the context of this specific combo, the CPU's role is diminished. The measured frame rates in Hitman 2 are consistently low, even at 1080p. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 73 FPS, but as the resolution and settings increase, the frame rate plummets. The fact that performance degrades so sharply with increased graphical load strongly suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck. The processor is capable of feeding frames much faster than the GPU can render them, but the GPU cannot keep up with the demand. The CPU is effectively waiting on the graphics card for most of the rendering process.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The GPU has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. It also features 10 ray tracing cores and has a peak FP32 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS. Its memory is designated as "System Shared," meaning it relies on the system's main memory rather than dedicated VRAM.
This GPU is the primary performance limiter in this configuration. Its benchmark results are exceptionally poor. It achieves a score of only 1184 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it at the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are legacy parts like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and the ATI Radeon HD 5770, being 0.2% and 0.5% behind them, respectively. This puts the Arc B370's performance on par with integrated graphics solutions from over a decade ago, indicating a severe lack of rendering power for a modern title like Hitman 2.
The GPU's limitations are clearly reflected in the measured frame rates. At 3840x2160, the highest resolution tested, the GPU manages only 14 FPS at High settings and 10 FPS at Ultra. Even at the lowest preset, it only achieves 25 FPS at this resolution. The performance is marginal at 2560x1440, where the Low preset yields 46 FPS, but the Ultra preset falls to 19 FPS. The data clearly shows that the Arc B370 is not designed for high-resolution or high-detail gaming, as its performance collapses under the load.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates for this combo in Hitman 2 show a consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution and settings are increased. The data provides a clear picture of the system's capabilities and limits.
At 3840x2160, the highest resolution tested, the system is not playable in any configuration. The Low preset produces an average of 25 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset averages 19 FPS, with a minimum of 16 FPS and a maximum of 21 FPS, indicating a very unstable experience. The High preset averages 14 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages only 10 FPS. This resolution is far beyond the capabilities of the GPU.
At 2560x1440, performance is marginally better but still mostly unplayable. The Low preset achieves an average of 46 FPS, which is borderline. The Medium preset averages 35 FPS, with a minimum of 30 FPS and a maximum of 40 FPS. This is not a smooth experience for a stealth game that requires precision. The High preset drops to an average of 26 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages only 19 FPS. None of these configurations provide a reliable frame rate for a good experience.
At 1920x1080, the system finally becomes playable, but only at the lowest settings. The Low preset achieves an average of 73 FPS, which is excellent and provides a smooth, responsive experience. The Medium preset averages 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 63 FPS. This is a playable frame rate, though the minimums may be noticeable in crowded scenes. The High preset averages 41 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for a game that benefits from consistent performance. The Ultra preset averages 30 FPS, which is too low for a smooth experience and represents the worst performance at this resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's overall rank in Hitman 2 is 2768 out of 3001 tested combinations. This places it in the bottom 7.7% of all tested systems, a definitive indicator of its low performance ceiling. This ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU's extremely low benchmark percentile of 5, which drags down the entire system's capability.
The Ryzen 5 7500F is not the reason for this low ranking. Its own performance metrics are solid, sitting at the 77th percentile of all CPUs. The processor's average benchmark score of 24964 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-13620H (0.2% ahead) and the Intel Core 5 210H (0.4% ahead). This suggests that if paired with a more powerful GPU, the combo's rank would be significantly higher.
The discrepancy between the CPU's high percentile and the GPU's low percentile creates an extreme imbalance. The data suggests that the system is held back by the GPU in every single test scenario. The processor has the power to drive much higher frame rates, but it is constrained by the graphics card's inability to render frames quickly. The rank of 2768 is a direct reflection of this GPU-limited performance. The system's overall capability is essentially that of its weakest component, and in this case, that is the Intel Arc B370.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured data, the only configuration that provides a consistently smooth and responsive experience is 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This setting yields an average frame rate of 73 FPS, which is well above the standard for playable performance in a stealth action game. This is the recommended target for this combo.
For users who prioritize visual fidelity over a high frame rate, the 1920x1080 Medium preset is the next viable option. The average of 54 FPS is acceptable, although the minimum of 46 FPS suggests there may be occasional stutters. This is a compromise that offers improved visuals while maintaining a generally playable frame rate.
The 2560x1440 Low preset is the only viable option at that resolution, with an average of 46 FPS. However, this is not as smooth as the 1080p experience, and users should be prepared for a less consistent frame rate. All other settings at 1440p, and every single configuration at 3840x2160, should be avoided. The average frame rates of 35 FPS or below in those configurations are too low to provide an enjoyable experience for this game. The Ultra presets at any resolution are not functional for gameplay, with the best Ultra result being 30 FPS at 1080p, which is still below the ideal threshold. The data is clear: this combo is for 1080p gaming at low to medium details.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Intel Arc B370
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + Intel Arc B370 in Hitman 2
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 25.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 19.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 14.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 10.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 46.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 26.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 19.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 73.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 54.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 41.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 30.0 |
Hitman 2 with Ryzen 5 7500F + Other GPUs
See how Hitman 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Hitman 2 with Arc B370 + Other CPUs
See how Hitman 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500F + Arc B370
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.