High On Life
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 76 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 41 | 49 | 63 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 67 | 81 | 103 |
| 1080p Full HD | 71 | 95 | 115 | 147 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
High On Life with Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 produces a highly playable experience in High On Life, though the data reveals a clear ceiling at 4K Ultra. Across the measured resolutions and settings, the combo demonstrates a typical 1080p-focused performance profile, with the strongest results at 1920x1080 Low where the average frame rate reaches 147 FPS. The 20-core, 28-thread CPU provides ample headroom, while the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory becomes a limiting factor at higher resolutions and quality presets. Benchmark results indicate that the sweet spot for this pairing lies at 1440p Medium, where the average frame rate of 81 FPS balances visual fidelity with smooth gameplay.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in High On Life?*
A: Based on the measured data, 2560x1440 with Medium settings offers the most balanced experience, delivering an average frame rate of 81 FPS with a minimum of 69 FPS and a maximum of 93 FPS. While 1920x1080 provides higher frame rates, the 1440p Medium setting achieves a superior combination of image clarity and performance.
Q: How does the RTX 5050 perform at 4K in this game?
A: The RTX 5050 struggles at 3840x2160. The Ultra preset yields an average of just 30 FPS, while High settings reach 41 FPS. Only by dropping to Low settings does the average climb to 63 FPS, which is playable but requires significant visual compromises.
Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700F a bottleneck for the RTX 5050?
A: The data suggests the CPU is not the primary constraint. The i7-14700F has a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 and a single-core score of 4958, which places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The frame rate scaling across resolutions follows GPU-bound patterns, indicating the RTX 5050 is the limiting factor.
Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset produces an average of 147 FPS, while Ultra drops that to 71 FPS. This represents a 76 FPS difference, or roughly a 51% reduction in average frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest quality preset.
Q: Does the combo rank highly among all tested combinations for this game?
A: The combo ranks 1795th out of 2958 tested combinations, placing it in the lower half of all configurations. This rank reflects the RTX 5050’s modest standing, as the GPU sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035.
Q: How does the 1440p Medium preset compare to 4K Low in terms of frame rate?
A: The 1440p Medium preset averages 81 FPS, which is significantly higher than the 4K Low average of 63 FPS. The 1440p Medium setting also provides better visual quality than 4K Low, making it the more efficient choice for this hardware combination.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-14700F is a Raptor Lake Refresh desktop processor with 20 cores and 28 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel memory bus, and it uses an Intel Socket 1700 interface with PCIe Gen 5 support providing 16 CPU lanes. The 65 W TDP reflects a power-efficient design for a 20-core part.
Benchmark results show the i7-14700F performing strongly in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. It achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 and a single-core score of 4958, with Geekbench scores of 19620 multicore and 2429 single-core. The PassMark multithread score of 41317 and single-thread score of 4257 further confirm its capabilities. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates strong overall performance, with nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon 6505P at a -0.2% delta and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at a 0.6% delta.
In High On Life, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with enough data to maintain frame rates. The measured FPS data shows consistent scaling across resolutions, which typically indicates a GPU-bound scenario. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo reaches 147 FPS, while at 3840x2160 Ultra it drops to 30 FPS. This scaling pattern suggests the i7-14700F is not the limiting factor; even at 1080p Low, where CPU load is highest relative to GPU, the processor’s 28 threads and high boost clock keep pace. The PassMark physics score of 2455 and integer math score of 155808 indicate solid compute throughput for game logic and physics calculations.
The CPU’s memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, combined with dual-channel bandwidth, provides adequate data transfer for the RTX 5050. Given the game’s 2022 release date, the i7-14700F’s architecture offers more than enough processing power for this title. The data shows no evidence of CPU-induced frame pacing issues, as minimum frame rates for Medium presets at 1080p (98 FPS) and 1440p (69 FPS) remain reasonably close to their averages.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, featuring 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. It includes 20 ray tracing cores and 80 tensor cores, with a base clock of 2317 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s FP32 performance is rated at 13.17 TFLOPS, with a pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s.
The RTX 5050’s 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor in High On Life. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate collapses to 30 FPS, likely due to memory capacity and bandwidth constraints. The 128-bit memory bus, while efficient, limits bandwidth to 320.0 GB/s, which becomes insufficient at high resolutions with demanding textures. The GPU’s 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the mid-range category, with an average benchmark score of 21035. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL at -0.6% delta and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT at 1.6% delta.
Benchmark scores for the RTX 5050 show strong compute potential but modest graphics performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 and PassMark G3D score of 17326 indicate a capable 1080p card. The DirectX 12 PassMark score of 66 is notably low, suggesting potential driver or optimization issues, though the game-specific measurements tell a more complete story. The GPU’s 130 W TDP and dual-slot design make it an efficient mid-range option, with a suggested PSU of 300 W.
In High On Life, the RTX 5050 demonstrates its strengths at lower resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080 Low, the average frame rate of 147 FPS shows the GPU’s raw throughput capability. However, the performance drop as resolution increases is steep: from 147 FPS at 1080p Low to 103 FPS at 1440p Low, and then to 63 FPS at 4K Low. This pattern indicates that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity become limiting factors at higher pixel counts. The 8 GB VRAM likely causes texture thrashing at 4K Ultra, explaining the 30 FPS average.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates for this combo span four resolutions and four quality presets, providing a comprehensive view of performance. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 147 FPS, which is the highest measured value across all configurations. Medium settings at 1080p produce an average of 115 FPS, with a minimum of 98 FPS and a maximum of 132 FPS. High settings reduce the average to 95 FPS, while Ultra drops further to 71 FPS. This represents a steady decline from Low to Ultra, with each quality step costing approximately 20-25 FPS on average.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales predictably. Low settings achieve an average of 103 FPS, while Medium yields 81 FPS with a minimum of 69 FPS and a maximum of 93 FPS. High settings produce 67 FPS on average, and Ultra falls to 50 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 53 FPS, which is proportionally similar to the 1080p gap of 76 FPS. The 1440p Medium preset’s minimum of 69 FPS indicates that even during demanding scenes, the frame rate remains above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
The 3840x2160 results show the most severe performance degradation. Low settings average 63 FPS, which is the only 4K preset to break 60 FPS. Medium settings drop the average to 49 FPS, with a minimum of 42 FPS and a maximum of 57 FPS. High settings average 41 FPS, while Ultra plummets to 30 FPS. The difference between 4K Low and 4K Ultra is 33 FPS, representing a 52% reduction in performance when moving from the lowest to the highest quality settings.
Comparing resolution scaling, the data shows consistent frame rate losses as pixel count increases. At Low settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces the average from 147 to 103 FPS, a 30% decrease. Moving from 1440p to 4K Low further reduces the average to 63 FPS, another 39% drop. At Ultra settings, the progression is 71 FPS at 1080p, 50 FPS at 1440p, and 30 FPS at 4K. These scaling patterns are typical of a GPU-limited scenario, where memory bandwidth and fill rate determine performance.
The Medium presets provide the most complete data, as they include minimum and maximum frame rates. At 1080p Medium, the range is 98-132 FPS around an average of 115 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range narrows to 69-93 FPS around an average of 81 FPS. At 4K Medium, the range is 42-57 FPS around an average of 49 FPS. The narrowing of the frame rate range at higher resolutions suggests that the GPU becomes more consistently utilized, with less variance in frame times.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination ranks 1795th out of 2958 tested combos in High On Life, placing it in the 39th percentile of all configurations. This rank reflects the GPU’s mid-range standing more than the CPU’s. The i7-14700F’s 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates strong processing capability, while the RTX 5050’s 66th percentile ranking shows it is a solid but not exceptional graphics solution.
The combo’s rank suggests that while the CPU is capable of supporting higher-performing GPUs, the RTX 5050 limits the overall system to mid-range frame rates. The GPU’s nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT at 1.6% higher and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL at 0.6% lower. These comparisons indicate that the RTX 5050 performs in line with previous-generation mid-range cards, which aligns with its measured FPS results in this game.
In the context of High On Life, the combo’s rank is influenced by the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM capacity. Many higher-ranked combos likely feature GPUs with more memory or wider memory buses, allowing them to maintain higher frame rates at 1440p and 4K. The RTX 5050’s 128-bit bus and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p gaming but become bottlenecks at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the steep performance drop at 4K.
The CPU’s contribution to the rank is positive; the i7-14700F’s multicore performance ensures that the system does not suffer from CPU bottlenecks, even at lower resolutions where the GPU has headroom. The PassMark data compression score of 505885 and floating point math score of 107005 show strong computational abilities that support game logic and streaming. However, the overall combo rank is ultimately capped by the GPU’s performance class.
This rank of 1795 out of 2958 indicates that the combo sits in the lower-middle tier of tested configurations. For a game like High On Life that is not particularly demanding, this rank suggests the combo is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but not competitive at 4K. Users seeking higher frame rates at 4K would need a GPU with more memory bandwidth and capacity, while the CPU would not require an upgrade.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user’s resolution preference and frame rate target. For 1920x1080, the High preset provides an average of 95 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset at 71 FPS is also playable, offering the highest visual quality while maintaining a reasonable frame rate. Users with high-refresh-rate monitors may prefer the Low preset’s 147 FPS, but the visual compromise is substantial.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset offers the best balance of performance and visual quality. The 81 FPS average with a minimum of 69 FPS ensures consistent gameplay, while the 69 FPS minimum indicates that even the most demanding scenes stay above 60 FPS. The High preset at 67 FPS is also viable, but the lower minimum frame rate (not measured, but likely below 60 FPS) makes it riskier for smooth performance. The Low preset at 103 FPS is an option for competitive play, but Medium provides a significantly better visual experience.
For 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only recommended option, as it achieves an average of 63 FPS. The Medium preset’s 49 FPS average and 42 FPS minimum would result in noticeable stuttering, and the High and Ultra presets at 41 FPS and 30 FPS respectively are not suitable for smooth gameplay. Users who prioritize 4K resolution should accept the visual downgrade to Low settings, or consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for a better experience.
The data supports a clear recommendation hierarchy: for the best overall experience, use 2560x1440 with Medium settings. This configuration delivers an 81 FPS average, which is smooth for most players, while maintaining better visual fidelity than 1080p. For users with 1080p monitors, the High preset at 95 FPS is the best choice, offering near-ultra visuals without the frame rate penalty of Ultra. At 4K, the Low preset is the only playable option, and users should be prepared for significant visual compromises.
The Medium preset at 1440p also benefits from having the most stable frame times, as evidenced by the 69-93 FPS range. This consistency is important for gameplay experience, particularly in an FPS where frame pacing affects aiming precision. The 1080p Medium preset’s range of 98-132 FPS is also stable, but the higher resolution at 1440p provides a more immersive experience without sacrificing smoothness. For users who prioritize frame rate above all else, the 1080p Low preset’s 147 FPS is the maximum achievable, but the visual quality loss is significant. Ultimately, the measured data points to 1440p Medium as the most balanced configuration for this CPU/GPU combo in High On Life.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-14700F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in High On Life
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 63.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 49.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 41.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 30.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 103.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 81.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 67.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 50.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 147.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 115.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 95.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 71.0 |
High On Life with ii7-14700F + Other GPUs
See how High On Life performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
High On Life with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs
See how High On Life performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-14700F + RTX 5050
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.