High On Life
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 62 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 33 | 40 | 51 |
| 1440p QHD | 41 | 54 | 66 | 84 |
| 1080p Full HD | 58 | 77 | 93 | 119 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
High On Life with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a playable, though not exceptional, experience in High On Life, a first-person shooter released on 2022-12-12. With a combo rank of 2356 out of 2958 tested combinations, this pairing sits in the lower third of the database, indicating that while the game runs, it struggles to maintain high frame rates at demanding settings, particularly at 4K resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
The overall ranking of 2356 out of 2958 combos places this system firmly in the lower 20 percentile of all tested configurations for High On Life (calculated from the rank and total). This is a below-average result for a modern FPS title, suggesting that the hardware pairing is not optimized for this specific game's engine. The data shows a significant performance bottleneck, as the system falls behind the majority of tested setups.
When analyzing the individual components, the CPU and GPU are both mid-range performers in their respective fields. The Ryzen 7 5700X is a solid processor, scoring in the 79th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27578. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600K, has an identical average score with a 0% delta, making them effectively equivalent in synthetic tests. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 trails by just 0.2%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H leads by 0.3%, indicating the 5700X is in a tightly contested performance bracket.
The Intel Arc B570 GPU scores in the 65th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556. Its closest rival is the Intel Arc A750, which is 0.1% faster, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.1% slower. This places the B570 in a competitive mid-range segment, but the game's results suggest that the combination of these two components does not scale well together for High On Life.
The discrepancy between the component-level percentiles and the overall combo rank is telling. The CPU and GPU are not weak parts individually, but their combined performance in this game is poor relative to other pairings. This suggests a potential driver overhead issue or an engine limitation that prevents the hardware from reaching its full potential.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in High On Life?*
A: The data shows 1920x1080 provides the most consistent playable experience, with average FPS ranging from 58 at Ultra to 119 at Low. 2560x1440 is also viable, with averages between 41 and 84 FPS, while 3840x2160 is only playable at Low settings, achieving 51 FPS average.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X compare to its closest rival?
A: The Ryzen 7 5700X has an identical average benchmark score of 27578 compared to the Intel Core i5-12600K, resulting in a 0% deltaPct. This puts the two processors in a dead heat for overall synthetic performance, though game-specific results can vary.
Q: Is the Intel Arc B570 a strong performer relative to its peers?
A: The Arc B570 scores in the 65th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750, is 0.1% faster in average benchmark score, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.1% slower, showing a tightly grouped competitive field.
Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this combo?
A: The highest average FPS recorded is 119 at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only preset that breaks the 100 FPS barrier in the measured data.
Q: Does the system maintain consistent frame times at 1080p?
A: At 1080p Medium settings, the system shows a minimum FPS of 79 and a maximum of 107, with an average of 93. This indicates a reasonable frame pacing, though the 28 FPS spread between minimum and maximum suggests some variation under load.
Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?
A: Performance drops significantly at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, yielding an average of just 25 FPS. This is not a playable experience for a fast-paced FPS, as the frame rate falls below standard playability thresholds.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a steep performance drop as resolution increases, which is typical for GPU-bound scenarios. At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 93. Moving to 2560x1440, the average drops to 66, a reduction of approximately 29%. At 3840x2160, the average plummets to 40, which is a further 39% decrease from the 1440p result and a 57% drop from the 1080p baseline.
This scaling pattern clearly indicates that the Intel Arc B570 is the primary limiting component at higher resolutions. The GPU's rendering load increases quadratically with pixel count, and the data reflects this, with frame rates nearly halving from 1080p to 4K. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, has sufficient headroom at these resolutions to feed the GPU, but the GPU cannot maintain high output as pixel count grows.
The performance gap between Low and Ultra settings also widens at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low (119 FPS) and Ultra (58 FPS) is 61 FPS. At 4K, the difference between Low (51 FPS) and Ultra (25 FPS) is only 26 FPS. This compression suggests that at 4K, the GPU is so heavily saturated that even lowering settings provides diminishing returns, reinforcing the conclusion that the GPU is the bottleneck in this configuration.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. Low settings produce an average of 119 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth for a first-person shooter. Medium settings yield an average of 93 FPS, with a minimum of 79 and a maximum of 107, indicating a stable experience. High settings reduce the average to 77 FPS, while Ultra settings bring it down to 58 FPS. All 1080p presets are playable, though Ultra may feel less responsive in fast-paced action.
At 2560x1440, performance remains acceptable but requires compromises. Low settings achieve an average of 84 FPS, which is still fluid. Medium settings drop to 66 FPS average, with a minimum of 56 and a maximum of 75, showing more frame-time variance. High settings average 54 FPS, which is borderline for competitive play. Ultra settings fall to 41 FPS average, which is playable but not ideal for a twitch shooter.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles. Low settings manage an average of 51 FPS, which is the only 4K preset that approaches playability. Medium settings drop to 40 FPS average, with a minimum of 34 and a maximum of 46, indicating significant stuttering potential. High settings average 33 FPS, and Ultra settings produce a barely playable 25 FPS average. These results show that 4K is generally not recommended for this combo, as even Low settings hover near the edge of smooth gameplay.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 1920x1080 is the optimal choice. The measured data shows an average of 93 FPS, which provides a smooth experience for a fast-paced FPS. The minimum of 79 FPS ensures that the game rarely dips below the 60 FPS threshold, maintaining fluidity during intense action sequences. The visual improvement over Low settings is substantial, and the performance hit from Low (119 FPS) to Medium (93 FPS) is acceptable given the smoother visuals.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is also the best compromise, yielding an average of 66 FPS. While this is lower than the 1080p result, it remains playable. The minimum of 56 FPS is close to the 60 FPS target, but occasional dips may be noticeable. For players prioritizing frame rate over visuals at this resolution, the Low preset at 84 FPS average is a viable alternative.
At 3840x2160, the data suggests that only the Low preset is worth considering, with an average of 51 FPS. However, this is still below the 60 FPS target for ideal FPS gameplay. The Medium preset at 40 FPS average is too low for a responsive experience, and High and Ultra are not recommended. For 4K gaming, players should expect to make significant visual sacrifices or consider a different GPU.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is a Zen 3 architecture processor built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 3.40 GHz, boosting up to 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. It has a 32 MB shared L3 cache, which is beneficial for gaming workloads.
In synthetic benchmarks, the 5700X performs strongly, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13184 and a single-core score of 1499. Its Geekbench scores are 10779 multicore and 2016 single-core. These results place it in the 79th percentile against all CPUs, indicating it is a capable processor for gaming. The CPU's 16 threads provide ample parallelism for modern game engines, which can offload background tasks and physics calculations.
For High On Life, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU. The resolution scaling data shows a clear GPU bottleneck, as frame rates drop proportionally with pixel count. The CPU is likely capable of delivering higher frame rates at lower resolutions, but the GPU limits the output. The 5700X's single-thread performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R15 single-core score of 253 and 3dmark single-thread score of 921, is sufficient for this game's logic and draw call processing, but it does not appear to be the limiting factor in this configuration.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, using a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. The GPU has 18 ray tracing cores and operates at a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz. It comes with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.
The B570's compute capabilities include an FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 14195 in Passmark G3D and 2649 in 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12. Its Geekbench Vulkan score is 96844, and OpenCL score is 83514. The GPU sits in the 65th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556.
In High On Life, the GPU is the dominant factor in performance. The measured FPS data shows that the card's capabilities are stretched at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the B570 can deliver high frame rates, but at 4K, it falls below playable thresholds. The memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s and 10 GB VRAM are adequate for this game, but the raw compute power is insufficient for 4K Ultra settings. The GPU's performance is closely matched with the Intel Arc A750, which is 0.1% faster in synthetic tests, but the B570's real-world performance in this title is limited by the game's engine and driver optimization.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + Intel Arc B570 in High On Life
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 40.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 33.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 25.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 84.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 66.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 54.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 41.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 119.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 93.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 77.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 58.0 |
High On Life with Ryzen 7 5700X + Other GPUs
See how High On Life performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
High On Life with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how High On Life performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700X + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.