Hard West

Hard West

AVERAGE FPS
162
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 162 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 57 73 97 115
1440p QHD 102 138 178 221
1080p Full HD 165 218 280 304

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 115
3840x2160 Medium 97
3840x2160 High 73
3840x2160 Ultra 57
2560x1440 Low 221
2560x1440 Medium 178
2560x1440 High 138
2560x1440 Ultra 102
1920x1080 Low 304
1920x1080 Medium 280
1920x1080 High 218
1920x1080 Ultra 165

Hard West with Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 delivers a commanding performance profile in Hard West, a 2015 turn-based tactics title. The measured data shows this combination ranks 38th out of 1,699 tested combos, placing it in the top 2.2% of all configurations. This pairing leverages a 14-core, 20-thread processor with a 5.30 GHz boost clock alongside a GPU with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and a 960.0 GB/s bandwidth, resulting in frame rates that range from playable at 4K Ultra to exceptionally fluid at 1080p Low.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this combo in Hard West?*

A: The highest measured average FPS is 304.1, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This represents the absolute ceiling for this configuration, showing the game can run at extremely high refresh rates when visual fidelity is minimized.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution with Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 56.8. This is the most demanding configuration tested, and while it remains above 60 FPS thresholds, it is the only setting combination that falls below the 60 FPS mark.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings produce 221.4 FPS, while Ultra settings yield 101.9 FPS. This represents a 119.5 FPS difference, indicating that Ultra settings impose a significant load on the GPU, reducing performance by more than half compared to Low.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck in this game?

A: The data suggests a mixed bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the 304.1 FPS result indicates the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at very high rates. However, the steep drop from 304.1 FPS at 1080p Low to 114.7 FPS at 4K Low (a 62.3% reduction) shows that the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

Q: How does the i5-14600KF compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49,367, which is 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600K (49,166) and 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (49,062). It trails the AMD EPYC 4345P by 0.5% (49,595).

Q: What is the best resolution for high-refresh-rate monitors?

A: For monitors with refresh rates above 144 Hz, 1920x1080 with Medium settings (280.4 FPS) or High settings (218.1 FPS) are ideal. At 2560x1440, High settings (138.4 FPS) still exceed 120 Hz, making it suitable for most high-refresh displays.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 achieves a rank of 38 out of 1,699 tested combos in Hard West. This places the pairing in the 97.8th percentile of all tested configurations, indicating exceptional performance relative to the broader hardware landscape. The CPU itself holds a 93rd percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 89th percentile among all graphics cards, suggesting a well-balanced pairing where neither component severely limits the other.

The rank of 38 is particularly notable given the game's age and turn-based nature. Hard West does not demand the same GPU resources as modern action titles, yet this combo still demonstrates that it can push frame rates to extreme levels. The data implies that the RTX 5080's raw compute power—evidenced by its 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance—is more than sufficient for this title, while the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for game logic and AI calculations. When compared to the GPU's nearest rivals, the RTX 5080's average benchmark score of 59,188 is 1.6% higher than the Intel Arc A570M (58,239) and 2.5% higher than the Intel Arc A580 (57,756), confirming its position as a high-end part, though the gap to the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X (57,661) is 2.6%.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of resolution-dependent scaling. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average FPS drops from 218.1 to 138.4—a 36.5% reduction. Continuing to 3840x2160 at High settings, the average FPS falls further to 73, representing a 66.5% decrease from the 1080p baseline. This scaling behavior is characteristic of a GPU-bound workload, where the increase in pixel count directly impacts rendering time.

At Low settings, the scaling is even more pronounced. The 1080p Low result of 304.1 FPS drops to 221.4 FPS at 1440p (a 27.2% reduction) and then to 114.7 FPS at 4K (a 62.3% reduction from 1080p). The fact that Low settings at 4K (114.7 FPS) still exceeds High settings at 1440p (138.4 FPS) is counterintuitive, but it highlights that the preset quality has a more substantial impact on performance than resolution alone. The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor—the 304.1 FPS ceiling likely approaches the processor's maximum frame generation capability. As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, evidenced by the consistent frame rate drops that align with pixel count increases.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates across all presets. Low settings produce 304.1 FPS, Medium settings yield 280.4 FPS, High settings achieve 218.1 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 164.6 FPS. The 1080p results demonstrate that even at Ultra settings, the game remains exceptionally playable on high-refresh-rate displays, with the 164.6 FPS figure still exceeding 144 Hz.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows a clear scaling penalty. Low settings produce 221.4 FPS, Medium settings reach 177.8 FPS, High settings hit 138.4 FPS, and Ultra settings yield 101.9 FPS. The 1440p data shows that Medium settings (177.8 FPS) still outperform 1080p Ultra (164.6 FPS), suggesting that users can enjoy higher resolutions without sacrificing frame rate if they are willing to lower quality presets.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's workload increases significantly. Low settings produce 114.7 FPS, Medium settings reach 97.1 FPS, High settings hit 73 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 56.8 FPS. The 4K results reveal that only Low and Medium settings maintain frame rates above 90 FPS, while High and Ultra dip below the 60 FPS threshold for Ultra. This breakdown indicates that 4K gaming is viable with this combo but requires careful preset selection to maintain smooth performance.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 plays a critical role in determining frame rates at higher resolutions. Its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 256-bit bus and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that texture data is readily available, even at 4K resolution. The GPU's 10,752 shading units and 112 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s, which directly influences fill-rate-bound scenarios common in turn-based tactics games with detailed static scenes.

The clock speeds of 2,295 MHz base and 2,617 MHz boost provide substantial compute throughput, translating to the 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance. This raw power is evident in the 4K Low result of 114.7 FPS, which is more than double the 4K Ultra result of 56.8 FPS. The 57.9 FPS difference between these presets highlights how the GPU's workload scales with visual effects, shadows, and post-processing rather than resolution alone. The GPU's 89th percentile ranking among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 59,188, positions it as a top-tier part, and the measured data confirms that it handles Hard West with ease at all but the most demanding settings.

Settings Recommendations

For users prioritizing maximum frame rates, 1920x1080 with Low settings (304.1 FPS) offers the highest performance, suitable for 240 Hz or 360 Hz displays. Medium settings at 1080p (280.4 FPS) provide a better balance between visual fidelity and speed, still exceeding 240 FPS. High settings at 1080p (218.1 FPS) remain an excellent choice for 144 Hz and 165 Hz monitors, offering improved visuals without dropping below the refresh rate threshold.

At 2560x1440, Medium settings (177.8 FPS) deliver the best experience for high-refresh gaming, comfortably exceeding 144 Hz while maintaining good detail. High settings at 1440p (138.4 FPS) are suitable for 120 Hz displays, and Ultra settings (101.9 FPS) work well for 100 Hz monitors. For 4K displays, Low settings (114.7 FPS) are the only preset that consistently exceeds 100 FPS, while Medium settings (97.1 FPS) remain above 90 FPS. High settings at 4K (73 FPS) are playable on 60 Hz displays, but Ultra (56.8 FPS) dips below 60 FPS, making it the only measured configuration that fails to maintain a smooth 60 FPS average.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14600KF provides the computational foundation for this combo, with 14 cores (including performance and efficiency cores) and 20 threads. Its 3.50 GHz base clock and 5.30 GHz boost clock deliver strong single-thread performance, crucial for turn-based tactics games that often rely on sequential game logic. The CPU's synthetic benchmark results—28,789 in Passmark extended instructions and 125,982 in Passmark integer math—indicate robust processing capability for game AI and pathfinding calculations.

The CPU's role becomes evident when examining the 1080p results. At 1080p Low (304.1 FPS) versus 1080p Ultra (164.6 FPS), the 139.5 FPS difference is driven by GPU workload, but the fact that the CPU can sustain over 300 FPS at Low settings shows it is not a limiting factor at lower resolutions. The processor's 93rd percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 49,367, places it slightly ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600K (49,166, +0.4%) and AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (49,062, +0.6%), while trailing the AMD EPYC 4345P (49,595, -0.5%). The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support provide adequate bandwidth for the GPU to receive draw calls, ensuring that the RTX 5080 is not starved of data, particularly at 1080p where the CPU's frame generation capability becomes the ceiling.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-14600KF

Cores / Threads 14 / 20
Base Clock 3500 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

VRAM 16 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2617 MHz MHz
TDP 360 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Hard West

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 114.7
3840x2160 Medium 97.1
3840x2160 High 73.0
3840x2160 Ultra 56.8
2560x1440 Low 221.4
2560x1440 Medium 177.8
2560x1440 High 138.4
2560x1440 Ultra 101.9
1920x1080 Low 304.1
1920x1080 Medium 280.4
1920x1080 High 218.1
1920x1080 Ultra 164.6

Hard West with ii5-14600KF + Other GPUs

See how Hard West performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Hard West with RTX 5080 + Other CPUs

See how Hard West performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-14600KF + RTX 5080

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.