Hard West
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 95 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 44 | 52 | 68 |
| 1440p QHD | 61 | 80 | 104 | 122 |
| 1080p Full HD | 93 | 126 | 162 | 195 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Hard West with Intel Core i5-11400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-11400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 pairing in Hard West presents a fascinating case study in how a turn-based tactics title from 2015 interacts with modern hardware. The data indicates a system capable of delivering excellent frame rates, yet the performance scaling across resolutions and settings reveals a complex relationship between the 6-core, 12-thread processor and the 8 GB GDDR7 graphics card. This analysis examines the measured FPS rows to interpret where the bottleneck lies and how the combo ranks among the 1,699 tested configurations.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The Intel Core i5-11400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Rocket Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its benchmark scores are solid for a mid-range desktop chip, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14372 and a single-core score of 2029. In the context of Hard West, which is a turn-based tactics game, the CPU's role is primarily to manage game logic, unit AI, and turn calculations, tasks that are often not heavily multi-threaded. The data suggests the processor is more than adequate for this title, as evidenced by the high frame rates at lower resolutions.
At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 195 FPS. This high figure indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to saturate its capabilities in a less graphically demanding scenario. However, the CPU's performance does not appear to be the limiting factor even at higher settings. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5619 and the Passmark multithread score of 16908 show a processor with reasonable parallel capability, but the single-thread performance, crucial for game logic, is also respectable, with a Passmark single-thread score of 2981. This balance is key, as Hard West likely relies on strong single-thread performance for its AI and turn resolution.
Comparing to its nearest rivals, the i5-11400F sits in a tight cluster. Its average benchmark score of 17181 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (17189, 0% delta) and the Intel Core i7-1260P (17212, -0.2% delta). The data implies that for this specific game, the CPU has ample headroom. When the resolution is increased from 1080p to 4K, the average FPS at High settings drops from 126 to 43.6. This significant reduction is a classic sign that the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU's performance remains relatively constant. The CPU is not being overtaxed; rather, it is the GPU's rendering load that dictates the final frame rate.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the other half of this pairing, and its characteristics are central to understanding the measured FPS. It features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU's boost clock is listed at 2497 MHz. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a crucial detail when analyzing performance at various settings. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS falls to a playable but modest 30.7. This low figure suggests that the GPU is being heavily taxed, likely due to both the high resolution and the demands of the Ultra preset.
The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 20891 places it in a competitive position, with its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, scoring 30097 (0% delta). However, the RTX 5060 trails in raw compute compared to that card. In Hard West, the GPU's role is to render the 2D and 3D elements of the isometric battlefield, handle lighting effects, and post-processing. The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K shows the GPU's workload increasing dramatically. At 1080p Low, the system hits 195 FPS, but at 4K Low, that number drops to 67.7. This is a 65% reduction in frame rate, which points directly to the GPU being the sole limiting component as pixel count increases.
The memory clock of 1750 MHz and the effective 28 Gbps data rate are high, but the 128-bit bus width is narrow. This combination can be a limiting factor at high resolutions and settings, as the GPU may not be able to efficiently access the textures and frame buffers needed. The 4K Ultra result of 30.7 FPS, which is below the 43.6 FPS at 4K High, indicates that the Ultra preset imposes a significant additional load, likely from more complex shaders and effects, that the GPU and its memory subsystem struggle to handle.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
Analyzing the measured FPS rows, the "High" preset emerges as the most balanced choice for this combination across all resolutions. At 1080p High, the system delivers 126 FPS, which is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay. Moving to 1440p High, the average is still a highly playable 80.4 FPS. Even at 4K High, the average of 43.6 FPS is acceptable for a turn-based tactics game, where reaction time is not as critical as in real-time genres. The data suggests that High offers a significant visual upgrade over Medium with a manageable performance cost.
The "Medium" preset offers a substantial performance boost over High, but the gains are not as significant as the drop from High to Ultra. At 1440p, Medium achieves 104.2 FPS compared to 80.4 FPS on High, a 30% increase. At 1080p, Medium hits 161.9 FPS versus 126 FPS on High. This makes Medium the best choice for users who prioritize high refresh rates or who want a safety margin for demanding scenes. However, the visual fidelity is likely reduced.
The "Ultra" preset is the most demanding, and the data shows it is not ideal for this combo at higher resolutions. At 1440p Ultra, the average FPS drops to 61.2, and at 4K Ultra, it plummets to 30.7. The performance hit from High to Ultra is severe, with a 44% reduction in FPS at 1080p (from 126 to 92.6) and a 30% reduction at 1440p (from 80.4 to 61.2). For a turn-based tactics game, 30.7 FPS is technically playable, but the data indicates that the Ultra preset's demands on the RTX 5060 are too high for a consistently smooth experience at 4K. The "Low" preset provides the highest frame rates, with 195 FPS at 1080p and 121.7 FPS at 1440p, but this comes at the cost of visual quality. Therefore, the "High" preset offers the best combination of visual fidelity and performance, ensuring a stable experience without pushing the GPU to its limits.
FAQ
Q: Can this system achieve 60 FPS at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, but only on the Low settings preset, where the measured average FPS is 67.7. On Medium, High, and Ultra presets, the average FPS drops to 51.8, 43.6, and 30.7, respectively, which are all below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p and 1440p at High settings?
A: At 1080p High, the system achieves 126 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average FPS drops to 80.4. This is a 36% decrease in performance, indicating that the GPU is taking on a significantly heavier load at the higher resolution.
Q: Is the Ultra preset viable for this game and GPU?
A: The Ultra preset is only viable at 1080p, where it achieves an average of 92.6 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, the frame rate falls to 61.2 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it drops to a demanding 30.7 FPS. The data suggests that Ultra is too demanding for 4K with this graphics card.
Q: How does the RTX 5060's 8 GB of VRAM impact performance?
A: The measured data shows a steep performance cliff when moving from High to Ultra settings. This is likely due to the 8 GB VRAM capacity being a limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. The 4K Ultra result of 30.7 FPS suggests the GPU is running out of memory bandwidth or capacity, as the High preset at 4K is significantly faster.
Q: What is the best preset for a 1440p monitor?
A: The High preset is the best choice for 1440p, delivering an average of 80.4 FPS. This provides a smooth and responsive experience. While Medium offers a higher 104.2 FPS, High provides a better visual quality with a still-playable frame rate.
Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its direct rivals in this system?
A: The i5-11400F is functionally equivalent in average benchmark score to its nearest rivals. It scores 17181, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U scores 17189 (0% delta) and the Intel Core i7-1260P scores 17212 (-0.2% delta). This indicates that the CPU is not a source of performance variance in this test.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The frame rate scaling from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 clearly identifies the GPU as the primary limiting component in this system for Hard West. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 126 at 1080p to 80.4 at 1440p, and then to 43.6 at 4K. This represents a 65% reduction in performance from 1080p to 4K. This scaling pattern is a textbook example of a GPU-bound scenario, where the number of pixels being rendered is the dominant factor. The CPU's workload does not change significantly with resolution, so the frame rate is directly tied to the GPU's rendering throughput.
The data for the Low preset shows a similar trend. The average FPS drops from 195 at 1080p to 121.7 at 1440p and finally to 67.7 at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is 65%, which is consistent with the High preset. This consistency further reinforces that the GPU is the bottleneck, as the relative performance hit is the same regardless of the visual settings. The 4K resolution requires four times the number of pixels as 1080p, and the RTX 5060's ability to fill those pixels is the determining factor. The narrow 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB of VRAM likely contribute to this limitation, as the GPU may struggle to feed its shading units with texture data at these high resolutions. Therefore, the resolution scaling analysis points overwhelmingly to the GPU, not the CPU, as the component that determines the playable settings and frame rates in Hard West.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
The measured data provides a complete matrix of performance for this combo. At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 195 FPS on Low, 161.9 FPS on Medium, 126 FPS on High, and 92.6 FPS on Ultra. These numbers show a smooth scaling where each increase in preset costs roughly 30-35 FPS. The system is clearly capable of handling 1080p with ease, even on the most demanding Ultra preset.
At 2560x1440, the average FPS figures are 121.7 for Low, 104.2 for Medium, 80.4 for High, and 61.2 for Ultra. The scaling here is less linear, with a larger gap between Medium and High (23.8 FPS) compared to Low and Medium (17.5 FPS). The 61.2 FPS on Ultra is a borderline result, suggesting that while it is playable, it may not be the most stable experience. The 4K results at 3840x2160 show a significant step down: 67.7 FPS on Low, 51.8 FPS on Medium, 43.6 FPS on High, and 30.7 FPS on Ultra. The jump from Low to Medium costs 15.9 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High costs only 8.2 FPS, indicating diminishing returns. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that falls below 40 FPS, confirming that it is not a recommended setting for this resolution with this hardware.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
In the overall database of tested hardware combinations for Hard West, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-11400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks at 822 out of 1,699 combos. This places it in the upper-middle portion of the performance distribution, which is a reasonable result given the components. The rank indicates that while this system performs well in absolute terms, there are 821 other combinations that achieve higher overall frame rates in this game. This ranking is influenced by the GPU's performance at high resolutions, where the 4K Ultra result of 30.7 FPS drags down the overall score relative to systems with more powerful graphics cards.
The CPU's position relative to its rivals does not directly affect this ranking, as its benchmark scores are nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U and Intel Core i7-1260P. The ranking is thus primarily determined by the GPU's capabilities. The RTX 5060's percentile of 73 among all GPUs suggests it is a mid-to-high-tier card, but the 822nd rank out of 1,699 combos shows that in a game like Hard West, which is not particularly demanding on the CPU, the GPU's limits are exposed. A combo with a more powerful GPU would rank higher, while a combo with a less powerful GPU would rank lower. The data implies that this pairing is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but its 4K performance is solely constrained by the RTX 5060's memory and compute capabilities, preventing it from cracking the top 500.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-11400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-11400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Hard West
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 67.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 51.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 43.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 30.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 121.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 104.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 80.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 61.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 195.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 161.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 126.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 92.6 |
Hard West with ii5-11400F + Other GPUs
See how Hard West performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Hard West with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs
See how Hard West performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-11400F + RTX 5060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.