Greedfall

Greedfall, an Action RPG released in 2019, presents a unique challenge for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and AMD Radeon RX 6600 combination. The data shows this pairing produces playable frame rates at mainstream resolutions, but the demands of Ultra settings and 4K resolution push the GPU to its limits. This analysis breaks down the measured performance to help you decide how to configure the game for the best experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combo in Greedfall?

A: Based on the measured FPS, 1920x1080 is the strongest resolution. At High settings, the combo delivers 102.9 FPS average, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the average drops to 67.6 FPS, which is still playable, while 3840x2160 at High averages only 43.1 FPS.

Q: How does the Ultra preset perform at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 61.8 FPS. This is playable but noticeably lower than the 102.9 FPS achieved at High settings. The 41.1 FPS difference between the two presets shows a significant performance cost for the Ultra visual upgrades.

Q: Is the RX 6600 a bottleneck for the Core Ultra 7 265K in this game?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU has a percentile rank of 97 against all CPUs, with strong multi-core scores like 50009 in Cinebench R23. The GPU, while ranking in the 69th percentile, has a relatively modest 8 GB of VRAM on a 128-bit bus, which struggles with the higher resolutions and settings.

Q: Should I use Medium or High settings for a balance of visuals and performance?

A: At 2560x1440, the difference is small: Medium averages 73.6 FPS while High averages 67.6 FPS, a 6 FPS difference. At 1920x1080, the gap is 9 FPS (111.9 vs 102.9). Given the modest performance gain, High settings appear to offer a better visual return for the small FPS cost.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Greedfall?

A: Only at Low settings, where the average is 54.8 FPS. At Medium, it drops to 47.3 FPS, and at High, it falls to 43.1 FPS. Ultra settings are not viable, producing only 25.3 FPS. For a smooth 4K experience, users would need to significantly lower settings or resolution.

Q: How does this combo rank against all other tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 1402 out of 1705 tested combinations for this game. This places it in the lower percentile of systems, confirming that while it can run the game, it is not a high-end configuration for Greedfall, especially when compared to systems with more powerful GPUs.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. For Greedfall, a 2019 Action RPG, the CPU’s high boost clock is more relevant than its massive core count, as the game’s engine is likely not optimized to use all 20 threads effectively.

The CPU’s benchmark scores indicate it has plenty of headroom. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 50009, and its single-core score is 7060, placing it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs. This means the Core Ultra 7 265K is unlikely to be the source of frame rate drops in this game. The PassMark single-thread score of 4904 further confirms its strong per-core performance. In this pairing, the CPU’s role is to feed frames to the GPU without creating a bottleneck, and the data indicates it does so effectively, as the frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings, which are GPU-bound variables.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and AMD Radeon RX 6600 ranks 1402 out of 1705 tested combos in Greedfall. This rank of 1402 places the system in the bottom 20% of all tested configurations, suggesting that for this specific title, the hardware is not optimized for top-tier performance. The CPU itself is a high-end part, ranking in the 97th percentile, but the GPU is the limiting factor, ranking in the 69th percentile.

The data shows that the GPU’s closest rivals have similar average benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon 890M is 0% faster, while the RX 580 2048SP is 0.2% slower, and the RX 6700M is 0.2% faster. This tells us the RX 6600 is positioned in a specific performance tier. When paired with the 265K, the overall system performance is dictated by this GPU tier, resulting in the low overall rank. The CPU’s raw power is effectively wasted in this configuration for Greedfall, as the frame rates are consistently limited by the graphics card’s capabilities.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo is capable of high refresh rates. Low settings produce an average of 137.2 FPS, Medium produces 111.9 FPS, and High produces 102.9 FPS. The drop to Ultra is steep, reducing the average to 61.8 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance decreases significantly. The averages are 94.6 FPS for Low, 73.6 FPS for Medium, 67.6 FPS for High, and 43 FPS for Ultra. The transition from High to Ultra at this resolution represents a 24.6 FPS loss, making Ultra a less attractive option for a 60 FPS target.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles. The average frame rates are 54.8 FPS at Low, 47.3 FPS at Medium, 43.1 FPS at High, and 25.3 FPS at Ultra. None of these settings achieve a consistent 60 FPS experience. The data shows that the performance scaling is not linear; the gap between Medium and High is smaller than the gap between High and Ultra at all resolutions, indicating that the Ultra preset introduces disproportionately heavy effects.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is a RDNA 2.0 architecture GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock is 2491 MHz. These specifications are modest for modern gaming, and the 8 GB VRAM is a key limitation for Greedfall’s higher settings, which likely require more memory for textures and geometry.

The GPU’s benchmark scores reflect its mid-range status. Its PassMark G3D score is 15096, and it sits in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. The data shows that in Greedfall, the RX 6600 is the definitive performance bottleneck. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only achieve 54.8 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU lacks the raw fill rate and memory bandwidth for 4K. The 128-bit memory interface is a particular constraint, limiting the data throughput necessary for high-resolution textures. The GPU’s performance is consistently the deciding factor in the FPS numbers, as the CPU easily outpaces it.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience for this combo is at 1920x1080 with High settings. This configuration yields an average of 102.9 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target and provides a smooth, responsive experience. The jump from Medium to High costs only 9 FPS (111.9 to 102.9), making High the optimal choice for visual fidelity without a significant performance penalty.

For users with a 1440p monitor, High settings are still viable, with an average of 67.6 FPS. This is just above the 60 FPS target and provides a good balance. However, users should be prepared to accept occasional dips. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset should be avoided, as it drops the average to 43 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for most users.

At 3840x2160, the system is not suited for a quality experience. Low settings are the only option that approaches a playable frame rate at 54.8 FPS, but this comes with significant visual compromises. For a better 4K experience, users would need to consider a more powerful GPU. Ultimately, the data dictates that the optimal configuration is 1080p High for the best combination of smoothness and visual quality. For a smoother experience at 1440p, Medium at 73.6 FPS is a safer bet than High if you prefer higher frame rates over slight graphical gains.