Greedfall

# Greedfall with Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + AMD Radeon 760M

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the AMD Radeon 760M integrated graphics is a mobile configuration that lands near the very bottom of the benchmark database for Greedfall, ranking 2929 out of 2938 tested combos. The CPU is a strong 16-core Meteor Lake part with a 24 MB shared L3 cache and boost clock of 4.80 GHz, but the GPU is an integrated RDNA 3.0 solution with 512 shading units and a 2599 MHz boost clock. Benchmark results show this combo is playable only at 1080p with reduced settings, and even then, frame rates hover in the 24-52 FPS range depending on preset. The data indicates a fundamental imbalance: the processor has ample headroom, but the graphics subsystem becomes the limiting factor at every resolution above 720p-class workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Greedfall?

A: The measured FPS data shows 1920x1080 is the only resolution where average frame rates reach playable levels. At 1080p, the Low preset averages 52 FPS, Medium averages 41 FPS, and High averages 37 FPS. At 2560x1440, the best average is 36 FPS on Low, and at 3840x2160, even Low only produces 21 FPS average.

Q: Can this combo handle Ultra settings in Greedfall?

A: No. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS drops to 24, which is below the 30 FPS threshold typically considered minimum for smooth gameplay. At 1440p Ultra, the average falls to 16 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it drops to 10 FPS. The measured data shows a steep performance cliff when moving from High to Ultra at any resolution.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 760M compare to its nearest rivals in raw GPU benchmarks?

A: The Radeon 760M scores 5310 in Passmark G3D, placing it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6400 (6001, 0.3% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (6000, 0.3% ahead), and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 (6049, 0.5% ahead). The differences are within 0.5%, making these GPUs effectively equivalent in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H a competitive processor?

A: Yes. The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 32697. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32707 (0% delta), while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 (0.1% behind). The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (0.4% ahead), showing the 155H is squarely in the middle of a tight pack.

Q: What is the minimum FPS behavior at Medium settings?

A: Only the Medium preset has recorded minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 35 FPS and maximum is 47 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 24-32 FPS. At 4K Medium, the range is 14-19 FPS. These numbers indicate frame time consistency degrades significantly as resolution increases.

Q: Does this combo have any headroom for future titles?

A: Given that Greedfall (a 2019 release) only reaches 52 FPS average at 1080p Low, the data suggests limited headroom. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 25 and DirectX 11 score of 52 indicate modest API-level performance, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15028 shows the processor is not the bottleneck.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. It operates at a base clock of 800 MHz and boosts to 2599 MHz, producing a peak FP32 throughput of 5.323 TFLOPS. The memory subsystem is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM, meaning bandwidth is "System Dependent" rather than a fixed specification. The GPU has 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but those features are largely irrelevant at the frame rates this chip can produce in Greedfall.

The Passmark G3D score of 5310 places the 760M in the 35th percentile of all GPUs, and its synthetic benchmark results show a mixed profile: DirectX 9 scores 65, DirectX 10 scores 19, DirectX 11 scores 52, and DirectX 12 scores 25. The low DirectX 12 score compared to DirectX 11 is notable, as Greedfall likely relies on older API paths. The GPU compute score of 2840 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 20255 suggest the chip can handle compute workloads, but rasterization performance is the limiting factor in gaming.

In Greedfall specifically, the GPU's performance dominates the measured results. At 4K resolution, the average FPS ranges from 10 at Ultra to 21 at Low, indicating that the 760M simply cannot fill enough pixels at that resolution. At 1440p, the range improves to 16-36 FPS, but only Low settings cross the 30 FPS threshold. At 1080p, the GPU finally has enough headroom to produce 37-52 FPS across Low to High presets. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 28 FPS (52 vs 24), which represents a 54% performance drop when enabling the highest preset.

The 760M's nearest GPU rivals in the database—AMD Radeon RX 6400, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, and NVIDIA Quadro P2000—all score within 0.5% of 5310 in average benchmark scores. This means the 760M's Greedfall performance is representative of a very specific performance tier, and users should not expect any of these GPUs to dramatically outperform the others. The 15 W TDP for the GPU, combined with the 28 W TDP for the CPU, indicates this is a power-constrained mobile platform where thermal and electrical limits further cap performance.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H features 16 cores and 22 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. This Meteor Lake processor is built on Intel's 7 nm process and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU's integrated graphics is listed as Arc Xe-LPG 128EU, though the benchmark system pairs it with the AMD Radeon 760M, suggesting a discrete or alternate configuration.

Processor benchmarks show strong multicore performance: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 15028, R20 multicore scores 8754, and R15 multicore scores 2450. Single-core scores are 1743 (R23), 1235 (R20), and 255 (R15). Passmark tests show a multithread score of 24873, integer math at 86870, floating point math at 63703, and data compression at 277353. The CPU's percentile rank of 83rd places it well above the median, and its nearest rivals—Intel Core i5-14600T and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360—are within 0.1% of its average score.

In Greedfall, the CPU's role is secondary to the GPU. The measured FPS data shows consistent scaling with resolution changes, which is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios. At 1080p Low, the 52 FPS average is likely near the ceiling for what the 760M can produce, and the CPU's 22 threads provide more than enough processing power for the game's AI and physics systems. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15028 indicates it could handle significantly more demanding workloads, but the integrated GPU's 5.323 TFLOPS peak becomes the constraint.

The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is a critical factor for this combo, as the Radeon 760M uses system memory for its frame buffer. In Greedfall, the difference between 1080p and 1440p at the same settings (e.g., High: 37 vs 26 FPS) reflects the GPU's need to access more memory data per frame. The CPU's dual-channel memory support helps mitigate this, but "System Dependent" bandwidth means actual performance varies with memory configuration.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal experience for this combo is 1920x1080 with the Low preset, which delivers a 52 FPS average. This is the only configuration in the entire dataset that exceeds 50 FPS average, and it provides the smoothest gameplay. The Medium preset at 1080p averages 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 FPS, which is still playable and offers improved visual fidelity. The 1080p High preset averages 37 FPS, which is acceptable for slower-paced RPGs like Greedfall, but the margin for drops is thinner.

At 1440p, the data suggests only Low settings are viable, with a 36 FPS average. Medium at 1440p drops to 28 FPS with a 24 FPS minimum, which will feel stuttery during combat. At 4K, no preset produces playable results—the best is Low at 21 FPS, and Ultra falls to 10 FPS. The recommendation is clear: users should target 1080p and choose between Low (52 FPS) for smoothness or Medium (41 FPS) for a balance of visuals and performance.

For users who prioritize visual quality over frame rate, 1080p High at 37 FPS is the highest preset that maintains an average above 30 FPS. Ultra settings should be avoided entirely, as even 1080p Ultra only reaches 24 FPS. The data shows a consistent pattern: each step from Low to Medium costs roughly 10-11 FPS at 1080p, while the jump from High to Ultra costs 13 FPS. This suggests diminishing returns on the Ultra preset, which likely enables effects that the 760M's 16 ROPs cannot handle efficiently.

How This Combo Ranks

This combo ranks 2929 out of 2938 tested combinations in Greedfall, placing it in the bottom 0.3% of all configurations. The rank reflects the integrated GPU's limitations rather than any CPU deficiency. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H's 83rd percentile CPU rank and the AMD Radeon 760M's 35th percentile GPU rank create a massive imbalance, and Greedfall's performance is dictated almost entirely by the weaker component.

The near-bottom ranking means this combo sits alongside other integrated-graphics laptops and low-end mobile platforms. The 9 combos ranked below this one likely feature even weaker GPUs or more constrained thermal envelopes. For context, the 760M's nearest GPU rivals (RX 6400, GTX 770M, P2000) would likely produce similar Greedfall results, but the CPU advantage of the 155H does not translate to higher frame rates in this game.

The rank of 2929 out of 2938 indicates that this is not a gaming configuration in any practical sense. It can run Greedfall at playable frame rates only at 1080p with reduced settings, and even then, the experience is closer to console-quality 30 FPS than the 60+ FPS that modern gaming PCs target. Users with this combo should treat Greedfall as an older title that runs acceptably at low settings, not as a showcase game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160 (4K): The Ultra preset averages 10 FPS with no recorded minimum or maximum. High averages 15 FPS. Medium averages 17 FPS with a range of 14-19 FPS. Low averages 21 FPS. None of these configurations are playable, and the data shows a 11 FPS spread between Low and Ultra, indicating the GPU is overwhelmed at this resolution regardless of settings.

2560x1440 (1440p): Ultra averages 16 FPS. High averages 26 FPS. Medium averages 28 FPS with a range of 24-32 FPS. Low averages 36 FPS. Only Low crosses the 30 FPS threshold, and the 12 FPS gap between Low and High shows that visual settings have a significant impact at this resolution. The Medium minimum of 24 FPS indicates frame drops below playable levels during demanding scenes.

1920x1080 (1080p): Ultra averages 24 FPS. High averages 37 FPS. Medium averages 41 FPS with a range of 35-47 FPS. Low averages 52 FPS. This is the only resolution where the combo delivers a usable experience. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 28 FPS drop (52 to 24), and the Medium minimum of 35 FPS suggests relatively stable frame times. Low at 52 FPS is the single best measured result across all resolutions and settings.

The data reveals that resolution scaling is nearly linear for this combo: dropping from 1080p to 1440p reduces FPS by roughly 30-35% at equivalent settings, and dropping to 4K reduces FPS by another 40-45%. This pattern is consistent with the GPU's 5.323 TFLOPS throughput being the bottleneck, as pixel count increases directly stress the ROP and shading units. The CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock and 24 MB L3 cache are never the limiting factor in any measured configuration.