Greedfall

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 lands at rank 799 out of 1705 tested combos in Greedfall. That places it almost exactly in the middle of the field — the 46.9th percentile of all combinations. For a 2019 Action RPG, this mid-pack positioning suggests the combo is neither a top-tier enthusiast build nor a minimal entry point. The data implies it sits in a comfortable zone where most players would find the experience acceptable, though not exceptional.

What makes this rank interesting is the asymmetry between the two components. The CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 73rd percentile against all GPUs. Yet their combined performance in this specific game only reaches the middle of the pack. This discrepancy hints that Greedfall's engine may not scale perfectly with modern hardware, or that the game's demands are balanced differently than synthetic benchmarks suggest. The combo's overall rank of 799 out of 1705 means there are 906 combinations that perform better, but also 798 that perform worse — a true middle-of-the-road result.

GPU Role

The RTX 5060 brings 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock runs at 2280 MHz with a boost of 2497 MHz. These specifications tell a story of a GPU designed for efficiency rather than raw brute force. The 8 GB frame buffer is modest by modern standards, but for Greedfall — a game from 2019 — it appears sufficient across most settings.

The GPU's benchmark profile shows a PassMark G3D score of 20891, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival in the database is the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT with a score of 30097 and a deltaPct of 0, meaning they perform virtually identically in aggregate benchmarks. This parity is noteworthy because the RTX 5060 achieves it with significantly less memory bandwidth on paper. The data suggests Greedfall is not heavily bandwidth-limited at most settings, since the 448.0 GB/s figure proves adequate for the game's demands.

The GPU's 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 299.6 GTexel/s texture rate indicate solid raw compute capability. In Greedfall, this translates to playable frame rates even at 4K, though the Ultra preset at that resolution drops to 39 FPS. The GPU's 48 ROPs and 120 TMUs suggest it can handle texture-heavy scenes reasonably well, which matters for an Action RPG with environmental storytelling. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern rendering paths the game might leverage.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture (Raphael codename), built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It runs at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boosts to 5.10 GHz. The 32 MB shared L3 cache is substantial, and the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth over dual-channel DDR5 provides ample data flow for gaming workloads.

In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22992 and a single-core score of 3246. Its 3DMark single-thread score of 999 and max-thread score of 6503 reveal strong per-core performance that benefits games like Greedfall, which may not fully utilize all 12 threads. The CPU's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D with an average score of 26574 and a deltaPct of 0.2, meaning the 7600 edges ahead by a hair — an impressive result for a 6-core part against an 8-core 3D V-Cache processor.

The 65W TDP and 5 nm process node make this an efficient choice. The 6,570 million transistors packed into a 71 mm² die suggest excellent density, though the gaming performance ultimately depends on how well Greedfall's engine exploits multiple cores. The PassMark multithread score of 27058 and single-thread score of 3910 indicate balanced capability, but the game's frame rates at lower resolutions suggest the CPU is rarely the bottleneck — the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

FAQ

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all tested combinations in Greedfall?

A: It ranks 799th out of 1705 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle range of the database. There are 906 combinations that perform better and 798 that perform worse.

Q: What is the GPU's closest rival according to benchmark data?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the nearest rival with an average score of 30097 and a deltaPct of 0, meaning the two GPUs have virtually identical aggregate benchmark performance.

Q: What is the CPU's closest rival and how close is the margin?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D is the nearest rival with an average score of 26574. The Ryzen 5 7600 leads by 0.2%, a negligible margin that suggests near-parity in multi-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo reaches 189 FPS average. The Ultra preset at the same resolution still delivers 86.3 FPS, indicating strong overall performance.

Q: Does the combo maintain playable frame rates at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the High preset delivers 57.8 FPS average, which is playable. The Medium preset achieves 63.2 FPS, while Low reaches 78.9 FPS. Ultra drops to 39 FPS, which may be below the threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the GPU's percentile ranking compare to its in-game performance?

A: The GPU ranks in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, yet the combo ranks in the 46.9th percentile of Greedfall combos. This gap suggests the game may not fully leverage the GPU's capabilities, or other system factors influence the final result.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern as resolution increases. At 1080p with High settings, the combo delivers 134.5 FPS. Moving to 1440p drops this to 96.7 FPS — a 28.1% reduction. Jumping to 4K brings it down to 57.8 FPS, a further 40.2% drop from 1440p. This scaling indicates that the GPU becomes progressively more stressed as pixel count rises, which is expected behavior.

The Low settings tell a similar story but with higher absolute numbers: 189 FPS at 1080p, 134.9 FPS at 1440p, and 78.9 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 28.6% and 41.5% respectively — remarkably consistent with the High preset's scaling. This consistency suggests the limiting factor is resolution-dependent rather than settings-dependent, pointing to the GPU as the primary constraint at higher resolutions.

Ultra settings amplify the effect. At 1080p, the combo manages 86.3 FPS, but this falls to 62.9 FPS at 1440p (a 27.1% drop) and 39 FPS at 4K (a 38.0% drop). The 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS is the only measurement that dips below 40 FPS, indicating that this combination struggles at the highest fidelity and resolution. The data suggests that for 4K gaming, players should stick to High or Medium presets to maintain fluid frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows provide clear guidance on which preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. At 1080p, the High preset at 134.5 FPS is the sweet spot — it delivers well above the 60 FPS threshold while maintaining reasonable visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 151 FPS offers a slight performance boost, but High's additional quality is worth the 16.5 FPS trade-off.

At 1440p, the High preset at 96.7 FPS remains excellent, comfortably surpassing 60 FPS. Medium at 105.4 FPS is also viable, but High provides better visual detail without sacrificing smoothness. The Ultra preset at 62.9 FPS is playable but close to the edge — any demanding scene could push it below 60 FPS. Low at 134.9 FPS is unnecessary unless chasing maximum refresh rates.

For 4K gaming, the High preset at 57.8 FPS is marginally below the ideal 60 FPS target, but the Medium preset at 63.2 FPS achieves it. The data suggests Medium is the recommended choice for 4K, as it maintains playability while offering acceptable visual quality. Low at 78.9 FPS is an option for players prioritizing smoothness over fidelity, while Ultra at 39 FPS should be avoided for active gameplay. Across all resolutions, the High preset provides the most consistent experience relative to visual quality.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce 189 FPS average, Medium reaches 151 FPS, High achieves 134.5 FPS, and Ultra drops to 86.3 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 102.7 FPS, showing a significant performance cost for maximum fidelity. All presets exceed 60 FPS, making 1080p a non-issue for this combination.

Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers scale down proportionally. Low yields 134.9 FPS, Medium hits 105.4 FPS, High reaches 96.7 FPS, and Ultra falls to 62.9 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 72 FPS, indicating the GPU is becoming more of a factor. Every preset still clears 60 FPS, though Ultra is only 2.9 FPS above the threshold — a reminder that headroom is limited.

At 3840x2160, the strain becomes evident. Low delivers 78.9 FPS, Medium achieves 63.2 FPS, High reaches 57.8 FPS, and Ultra drops to 39 FPS. The Low-to-Ultra spread is 39.9 FPS, showing that resolution scaling amplifies the performance differences between presets. Only Low and Medium maintain 60+ FPS, while High falls just short and Ultra is clearly below playable standards. The data indicates that 4K Ultra is the one configuration where this combo cannot deliver a smooth experience, with the 39 FPS result being the lowest recorded measurement across the entire test matrix.