Greedfall

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ranks 655th out of 1,705 tested combos in Greedfall. That places this pairing in the upper-middle tier of the database, meaning it is capable of delivering strong frame rates but is not at the absolute top of the performance hierarchy. The rank reflects a balance where the GPU provides solid rasterization throughput, while the CPU's six Zen 4 cores are more than adequate for this 2019 Action RPG, which does not push thread counts to extremes.

Benchmark results indicate the combo is well-matched for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p play, but it loses steam at 4K Ultra, where the average frame rate drops below 45 FPS. The percentile standings reinforce this: the CPU sits in the 83rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU is in the 74th percentile among all graphics cards. The delta between the two suggests the RTX 3070 Ti is the more limiting factor in GPU-heavy scenes, but the Ryzen 5 7600's single-thread strength keeps the combo from being bottlenecked at lower resolutions. In practical terms, this rank means the pairing delivers a smooth experience in most settings, with the caveat that 4K Ultra is not viable for consistent play.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1188 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective, and the boost clock is 1770 MHz. These specifications matter for Greedfall because the game's open-world environments and texture detail scale with memory bandwidth and capacity. At 4K Ultra, the 8 GB frame buffer becomes a constraint; the average FPS falls to 43.7, indicating that the GPU is saturated by both rasterization load and memory pressure.

At 1440p High, the same card produces 108.8 FPS, which is a 66% improvement over 4K High's 65.3 FPS. This scaling shows that the RTX 3070 Ti has enough headroom for 1440p but not for 4K at higher presets. The GPU's passmark G3D score is 23,356, and its average benchmark score is 30,849, placing it just 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6700 and 0.9% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 in aggregate tests. In Greedfall specifically, the GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores are largely irrelevant because the game does not use ray tracing, so the raw FP32 throughput of 21.75 TFLOPS drives most of the performance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a six-core, twelve-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It has 32 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. In Greedfall, which is not heavily multithreaded, the CPU's single-thread performance is the key factor. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,246 and multi-core score of 22,992 indicate that the chip has ample headroom for this game's AI and physics calculations.

The CPU's percentile rank of 83 means it outperforms the majority of tested processors, and its average benchmark score of 26,617 is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (0.2% ahead) and the Intel Core i9-12900HK (0.2% behind). At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 216.6 FPS, which suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck even at lower settings where the GPU has less work. The Ryzen 5 7600's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for Greedfall's engine, and the boost clock of 5.10 GHz ensures that frame pacing remains consistent. The data shows that upgrading the CPU would yield minimal gains in this game; the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Greedfall?

A: 1440p High delivers 108.8 FPS, which is smooth and visually detailed. 1080p High reaches 155.7 FPS, but 1440p offers a better balance of image quality and performance.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K in Greedfall?

A: At 4K High, the average FPS is 65.3, which is playable. However, 4K Ultra drops to 43.7 FPS, which may feel stuttery in combat. Lowering to 4K Medium yields 67.6 FPS, but the GPU is clearly stressed at this resolution.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7600 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600's average benchmark score of 26,617 is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i9-12900HK, making them statistically equivalent in aggregate performance.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti's average benchmark score of 30,849 is 0.8% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6700 and 0.9% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro M5000, showing it sits in a tight performance band.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: At 1080p and 1440p, the GPU is the primary limiter, as shown by the FPS drop from 155.7 at 1080p High to 108.8 at 1440p High. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 216.6 FPS, indicating the CPU can push beyond the GPU's limits.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a consistent drop as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, the average FPS goes from 155.7 at 1080p, to 108.8 at 1440p, and finally to 65.3 at 4K. This represents a 30% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 40% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The pattern is similar across other presets: Low settings drop from 216.6 at 1080p to 147.5 at 1440p and 91.7 at 4K, while Medium drops from 172.2 to 117.7 to 67.6.

The scaling behavior indicates that the RTX 3070 Ti is the dominant constraint at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance allows the GPU to run near its maximum output, but as pixel count increases, the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth become the bottleneck. The Ultra preset shows this most clearly: 100.5 FPS at 1080p falls to 69 at 1440p and 43.7 at 4K, a 56% total drop. For players targeting 4K, the data suggests sticking to High settings or lower, as the jump from High to Ultra costs 33% performance at 4K (65.3 to 43.7 FPS).

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows show that High is the optimal preset for this combo across all resolutions. At 1080p, High delivers 155.7 FPS, which is significantly smoother than Ultra's 100.5 FPS, with a modest visual difference. At 1440p, High hits 108.8 FPS, which is ideal for a 100Hz monitor, while Ultra drops to 69 FPS. At 4K, High maintains 65.3 FPS, which is playable, while Ultra falls to 43.7 FPS, which is not recommended for action gameplay.

Low settings provide the highest frame rates — 216.6 at 1080p, 147.5 at 1440p, and 91.7 at 4K — but the visual quality loss is substantial for an RPG with detailed environments. Medium offers a middle ground: 172.2 at 1080p, 117.7 at 1440p, and 67.6 at 4K. For competitive or high-refresh play, Low at 1440p is a strong choice, but for the intended Action RPG experience, High at 1440p is the best balance of fidelity and smoothness. The data indicates that Ultra is only viable at 1080p, where it still maintains 100.5 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces the following average frame rates: Low 216.6, Medium 172.2, High 155.7, and Ultra 100.5. The gap between Low and Ultra is 116.1 FPS, showing that the GPU has significant headroom at this resolution. The step from High to Ultra is the largest single drop (55.2 FPS), suggesting that Ultra's shadow and texture settings are particularly demanding.

At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low 147.5, Medium 117.7, High 108.8, and Ultra 69. The drop from High to Ultra is 39.8 FPS, and the pattern mirrors 1080p but with lower absolute numbers. The 1440p results are the most balanced for this combo, with High and Medium both exceeding 100 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low 91.7, Medium 67.6, High 65.3, and Ultra 43.7. The difference between Medium and High is only 2.3 FPS, making High the better choice for visual quality at 4K. The Ultra preset falls below the 45 FPS threshold, which is generally considered the minimum for comfortable play in a game with real-time combat. Overall, the data shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p, with 4K reserved for Low or High settings depending on the player's tolerance for frame rate fluctuations.