Greedfall

Greedfall, a 2019 Action RPG, presents a familiar test for modern hardware: how does a modern NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 paired with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F handle a title from the previous console generation? The measured data reveals a combination capable of extreme frame rates, but also exposes a clear shift in bottleneck behavior as resolution and settings change. The analysis below interprets the benchmark results, focusing on the scaling patterns and the specific roles the CPU and GPU play in this configuration.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K paints a clear picture of where the performance ceiling lies for this combo in Greedfall. The most telling observation is the massive jump in performance at lower resolutions, which strongly indicates a CPU-bound scenario at 1080p. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo produces an average of 235 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 High, that number drops to 163 FPS, a 30.6% decrease. The jump to 3840x2160 High yields 97 FPS, another 40.5% drop from the 1440p result. This steep, consistent decline from 1080p to 4K is the signature of a system where the GPU is progressively becoming the limiting factor as the pixel count increases.

However, the scaling pattern is not uniform across all settings. The Ultra preset tells a slightly different story. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 150 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 104 FPS, a 30.7% reduction that mirrors the High preset's scaling. At 4K Ultra, the average falls to 62 FPS, a 40.4% drop from 1440p. This suggests that at Ultra settings, the added graphical complexity (likely heavy on shaders and post-processing) keeps the GPU thoroughly engaged even at 1080p, yet the rate of scaling loss between resolutions remains remarkably consistent. The bottleneck is still transitioning, but the GPU's workload is higher across the board.

The Low and Medium presets offer the most intriguing data for bottleneck analysis. At 1080p Low, the system hits 311 FPS, a figure so high it almost certainly approaches the practical limit of what the Ryzen 5 5600F can feed. Dropping to 1440p Low reduces the average to 228 FPS (a 26.7% drop), and 4K Low still manages 136 FPS (a 40.4% drop from 1440p). The fact that 1440p Low (228 FPS) is still higher than 1080p Ultra (150 FPS) is a critical insight. It shows that the CPU can push well over 200 frames, but the GPU's rendering workload at Ultra settings, even at a lower resolution, is what brings the frame rate down. The data implies that at Low and Medium settings, the CPU is the primary constraint at 1080p and 1440p, with the GPU only becoming the clear limiting factor at 4K. At High and Ultra, the GPU's role is more significant even at 1080p, though the scaling still points to a balanced shift as resolution climbs.

FAQ

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the system delivers an average of 62 FPS. This is the most demanding configuration tested and is the only one where the average dips below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that the RTX 5080 is being pushed to its limits with this CPU.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average frame rate is 311 FPS, while at Medium it is 259 FPS. The sheer height of these numbers, combined with the fact that 1440p Low (228 FPS) surpasses 1080p Ultra (150 FPS), strongly suggests the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is the primary bottleneck at these lower resolutions, with the GPU having significant headroom.

Q: What is the performance difference between the High and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset yields an average of 163 FPS, while the Ultra preset yields an average of 104 FPS. This represents a 36.2% reduction in frame rate for the higher visual fidelity, a substantial cost for the extra graphical effects.

Q: What are the minimum frame rates recorded for this combo?

A: The data includes minimum frame rate (minFps) values only for the Medium preset. At 3840x2160 Medium, the minFps is 91. At 2560x1440 Medium, it is 152, and at 1920x1080 Medium, it is 220. These figures provide insight into frame pacing stability, with the 4K result showing a notable dip from the 107 FPS average.

Q: How does the combo rank compared to other tested configurations in this game?

A: This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks 201 out of 2938 tested combos for Greedfall. This places it in the top 6.8% of all tested systems, indicating excellent overall performance.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 4K?

A: The jump from Low to Ultra at 3840x2160 is substantial. The Low preset achieves an average of 136 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 62 FPS. This is a 54.4% decrease in performance, highlighting the extreme graphical demands of the Ultra preset at 4K resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested hardware configurations for Greedfall, this pairing sits in a position of high esteem. The benchmark database places the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combo at rank 201 out of 2938 total combos. This percentile placement reflects the raw power of the components, but the data suggests it is not necessarily at the very top. The GPU's individual percentile is 87, and the CPU's is 85, yet their combined rank in this specific game implies that other factors, such as the game's engine and its utilization of the hardware, play a role.

The rank indicates that while this system is exceptionally fast, there are 200 other combinations that produce higher average frame rates in Greedfall. This could be due to CPUs with higher single-thread performance, as the game might be sensitive to that metric, or it could be that the RTX 5080's immense power is often held back by the Ryzen 5 5600F in this title. The fact that the combo is not ranked higher, despite the components' high individual percentiles, reinforces the analysis that this game can be heavily CPU-bound, especially at lower resolutions. The data shows a system that is a top-tier performer, but one whose ultimate potential in Greedfall is capped by its processor in many scenarios.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the results are a clear indicator of CPU limitation. The Low preset achieves a staggering 311 FPS average, which is the highest score recorded for this combo. The Medium preset drops to 259 FPS (min 220, max 297), and High is 235 FPS. The Ultra preset, with its heavier GPU load, brings the average down to 150 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra at this resolution shows a 51.8% performance hit, a massive cost for maximum visual quality.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain exceptionally high but begin to show the GPU's increasing workload. The Low preset averages 228 FPS, a 26.7% reduction from the 1080p Low score. Medium averages 179 FPS (min 152, max 206), High averages 163 FPS, and Ultra averages 104 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 54.4%, similar to the 1080p spread, but the absolute numbers are lower. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The Low preset averages 136 FPS, which is still very playable, but the scaling is steep. Medium averages 107 FPS (min 91, max 123), High averages 97 FPS, and Ultra drops to 62 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, and the 54.4% difference between Low and Ultra at 4K mirrors the pattern seen at 1440p, showing a consistent cost for the Ultra preset.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a formidable piece of silicon, and its data sheet explains why it can drive Greedfall to such high frame rates. With 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, it offers 960.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for a game of this era. The GPU's high texture fillrate and pixel rate, derived from its 10752 shading units and 112 ROPs, are key to its 4K performance. However, the benchmark results show the GPU is often not the limiting factor. The fact that 1080p Ultra (150 FPS) is lower than 1440p Low (228 FPS) is a direct consequence of the GPU's work. The Ultra preset likely introduces complex shaders and effects that hammer the GPU, even at a lower resolution.

The GPU's role becomes more critical at 4K. The significant drop from 1440p to 4K at every settings level shows the GPU struggling to keep up with the increased pixel count. The data indicates that the RTX 5080 is capable of handling Greedfall at 4K with High settings, averaging 97 FPS, but the Ultra preset at 4K, with a 62 FPS average, is its limit. The GPU's percentile of 87 versus all GPUs places it in the top tier, and its average benchmark score of 56083 demonstrates its raw compute power. In this specific pairing, the RTX 5080 is a powerhouse that is often waiting for the CPU to send it more data, particularly at 1080p and 1440p.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is the central figure in this system's bottleneck story. Based on the Zen 3 architecture, it offers 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. While its multithreaded performance is solid (Passmark score of 19236), its single-thread score of 2872 is the more relevant metric for Greedfall's frame rate generation. The data strongly suggests this CPU is the primary limiter at 1080p and 1440p. The 311 FPS average at 1080p Low is an indicator of the CPU's maximum frame generation capability in this game. The fact that 1080p High (235 FPS) is lower than 1080p Low (311 FPS) shows that even at High settings, the GPU is starting to do more work, but the 1440p Low result of 228 FPS still being higher than 1080p High of 235 FPS is a narrow gap, pointing to a balanced shift.

The CPU's cache configuration, with 32 MB of shared L3 cache, is a key feature for gaming performance, but it cannot overcome the sheer number of frames the GPU can produce. The Ryzen 5 5600F's percentile of 85 against all CPUs shows it is a strong processor, but its performance is eclipsed by the RTX 5080's capabilities. The data implies that in Greedfall, the CPU's frame generation ceiling is around 300 FPS at the lowest settings. When the GPU is tasked with more complex rendering (e.g., Ultra settings), the CPU has enough headroom, but at lower settings, it is the definitive bottleneck. The near-identical performance of the 5600F to rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (deltaPct of 0) and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (deltaPct of -0.2) in average benchmark scores indicates it is a typical mid-range performer, which is outpaced by the top-tier GPU in this pairing.

Settings Recommendations

For players using this AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination, the settings recommendation depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear choice. The system delivers a 150 FPS average, which is far above the smoothness threshold for competitive or high-refresh-rate play. Since the CPU is the bottleneck at this resolution, the GPU has ample headroom to run the most demanding preset without causing a significant performance issue. There is no reason to use a lower preset at 1080p, as the visual benefits of Ultra are essentially free given the high frame rates.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is still the best option. The 104 FPS average is excellent and provides a great balance of visual fidelity and performance. The Medium and High presets offer higher frame rates (179 and 163 FPS, respectively), but the drop to Ultra is a 36.2% reduction for a substantial improvement in visual quality. For a single-player Action RPG, the visual upgrade is worth the performance cost. The 4K resolution presents the only real trade-off. At 3840x2160, the High preset at 97 FPS is the sweet spot. The Ultra preset drops to 62 FPS, which is still playable but approaches the edge of smoothness for some users. The data shows that High provides 56.5% more performance than Ultra at 4K, making it the recommended choice for a high-refresh-rate experience. The Medium preset at 107 FPS is also viable, but High is the better balance of quality and speed. The Ultra preset is only recommended for players who prioritize absolute visual fidelity over frame rate consistency, as the 62 FPS average is the lowest recorded in the data.