Fivem

# FAQ

Q: What is the overall rank of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combo in Fivem?

A: This combo ranks 2387th out of 3005 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the lower 21st percentile of all tested systems. This indicates that while the combo is functional, most other hardware pairings deliver better performance in this specific multiplayer title.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in aggregate benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035, placing it just 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153) and 1% behind the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237). It is 1.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713) and 1.6% behind the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21379). These are very tight margins, indicating near-parity with these older or mobile-oriented parts.

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile and how does it compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core Ultra X9 388H sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44466. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, scores 44573 (0.2% higher), while the Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342 (0.3% lower). The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44309) and Intel Core i5-13600 (44240) are 0.4% and 0.5% lower respectively.

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable at 1080p with this combo?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 139 FPS, which is the highest measured result across all tested settings and resolutions. Dropping to Medium yields 109 FPS, High produces 88 FPS, and Ultra falls to 68 FPS.

Q: Does the RTX 5050 have enough VRAM for Fivem at 4K?

A: The RTX 5050 comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 320.0 GB/s bandwidth. At 3840x2160, the best average FPS recorded is 51 on Low settings, dropping to 32 on High and 25 on Ultra. The data suggests that while 8 GB is sufficient to run the game at 4K, the performance ceiling is low, and higher settings cause significant frame rate degradation.

Q: What is the GPU's pixel and texture throughput relative to its FP32 compute?

A: The RTX 5050 delivers 82.30 GPixel/s pixel fill rate and 205.8 GTexel/s texture rate, while its FP32 compute is 13.17 TFLOPS. These figures indicate that the card is balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K results in Fivem show it struggling to maintain playable frame rates at higher settings.

---

# How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination ranks 2387th out of 3005 tested systems in Fivem. This position places the combo in the bottom 21% of all tested hardware pairings, which is a surprising outcome given the individual component specifications. The CPU itself performs at the 88th percentile among all processors, and the GPU sits at the 66th percentile among all graphics cards. However, the combination does not translate to strong Fivem-specific performance.

The discrepancy between component-level percentiles and the in-game rank suggests that Fivem's multiplayer architecture is particularly demanding on certain subsystems. The combo's rank of 2387 means that roughly 79% of tested systems outperform it in this title. This is not a reflection of the CPU's raw compute capability—its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18911 and single-core score of 2200.5 are respectable—but rather indicates that Fivem's engine may not scale well with this particular hardware configuration.

Looking at the measured FPS data, the combo delivers playable frame rates at 1080p across all settings, with Low hitting 139 FPS and Ultra still maintaining 68 FPS. At 1440p, the results range from 91 FPS on Low to 45 FPS on Ultra, which is borderline playable. At 4K, the system dips below 60 FPS on every setting, with Ultra dropping to 25 FPS. This pattern suggests that while the combo can handle competitive gaming at lower resolutions, it is not designed for high-resolution or high-detail multiplayer experiences.

The rank becomes more understandable when viewing the GPU's nearest rivals. The RTX 5050's average benchmark score of 21035 puts it in the same performance class as the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153) and AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237). These are significantly older or lower-tier parts, which explains why the combo struggles in a game that may be more GPU-bound at higher resolutions. The CPU's nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573) and Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342), all have similar aggregate scores, so the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this pairing.

---

# GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is the primary graphics processor in this combo, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process node from TSMC. The chip, designated GB207, contains 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die, with a transistor density of 113.4M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2317 MHz and boosts to 2572 MHz, with memory running at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective).

The 8 GB GDDR6 memory configuration with a 128-bit bus provides 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. In Fivem, this memory capacity appears adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as the measured frame rates remain consistent across settings at these resolutions. However, at 4K, the combination of memory bandwidth and capacity begins to show limitations, with average FPS dropping to 51 on Low and 32 on High. The 4K Medium setting records a min FPS of 34, suggesting that memory pressure or bandwidth constraints cause frame time spikes in busy multiplayer scenes.

The GPU's compute capabilities include 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. The FP32 throughput of 13.17 TFLOPS, paired with a pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s, provides the raw processing power needed for modern game rendering. In Fivem's context, the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The transition from 1080p Low (139 FPS) to 4K Low (51 FPS) represents a 63% performance drop, while the same settings transition from 1080p Ultra (68 FPS) to 4K Ultra (25 FPS) shows a 63% drop as well, indicating consistent scaling behavior across the resolution spectrum.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 66 puts it in the upper two-thirds of all graphics cards, but its nearest rivals—all scoring within 1.6%—are not modern high-end parts. This suggests that the RTX 5050 is positioned as a mid-range mobile or entry-level desktop solution, which aligns with its measured Fivem performance being adequate but not exceptional.

---

# Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of how this combo performs across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results: Low settings produce an average of 139 FPS, Medium yields 109 FPS with a min of 93 and max of 126, High achieves 88 FPS, and Ultra drops to 68 FPS. These numbers indicate that 1080p gaming is viable across all settings, with even Ultra maintaining a playable frame rate.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. Low settings average 91 FPS, Medium averages 72 FPS (min 61, max 83), High averages 58 FPS, and Ultra averages 45 FPS. The 1440p results show that the combo can handle competitive play on Low and Medium settings, but High and Ultra push the frame rate below the 60 FPS threshold that many players consider the minimum for smooth multiplayer experiences.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles significantly. Low settings average 51 FPS, Medium averages 40 FPS (min 34, max 46), High averages 32 FPS, and Ultra averages 25 FPS. None of the 4K settings achieve a consistent 60 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls below 30 FPS, which is generally considered the minimum for playable frame rates in fast-paced games.

The Medium settings at each resolution provide the most complete data, as they are the only preset with min and max FPS recorded. At 1080p Medium, the 93-126 FPS range shows reasonable consistency. At 1440p Medium, the 61-83 FPS range indicates some frame time variance but remains within playable bounds. At 4K Medium, the 34-46 FPS range reveals significant inconsistency, which could lead to stuttering in Fivem's multiplayer environments where other players' actions can cause sudden frame rate drops.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an average FPS drop of approximately 34-35% across all settings (139 to 91, 109 to 72, 88 to 58, 68 to 45). The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a further drop of approximately 44-45% (91 to 51, 72 to 40, 58 to 32, 45 to 25). This non-linear scaling suggests that the GPU becomes increasingly stressed as resolution increases, with the 4K results indicating that the RTX 5050 is not suited for this resolution in Fivem.

---

# CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 3, based on the Panther Lake architecture manufactured on Intel's 3 nm process. It runs at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boosts to 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 25 W. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus, providing 153.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU performs well. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 18911, and its single-core score is 2200.5. The PassMark multithread score of 36811 and single-thread score of 4280 further confirm its capability. The CPU's percentile ranking of 88 places it in the top 12% of all processors, and its nearest rivals—the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573) and Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342)—have aggregate scores within 0.3% of the Core Ultra X9 388H's 44466.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is less pronounced than the GPU's, particularly at higher resolutions. The measured FPS data shows that the combo's performance is more consistent at 1080p, where the CPU has a greater influence on frame rates. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 139 FPS, which suggests that the CPU can feed frames quickly enough to keep the GPU busy. The 16 cores and 16 threads are likely sufficient for Fivem's multiplayer logic, which often involves processing data from many other players simultaneously.

However, the CPU's 25 W TDP, while efficient, may limit sustained performance in extended gaming sessions. The boost clock of 5.10 GHz provides strong single-thread performance, which is crucial for Fivem's game logic and physics calculations. The L3 cache of 18 MB is shared across all cores, which can help with data sharing between threads in a multiplayer setting. The memory bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s is adequate for the CPU's needs but may become a bottleneck if the GPU requires more data throughput at higher resolutions.

The CPU's aggregate benchmark score of 44466, being only 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, indicates that this processor is competitive with some of the best gaming CPUs available. Yet, the combo's overall rank in Fivem (2387 out of 3005) suggests that the CPU's strong performance is not fully utilized in this game, or that the GPU holds the system back at the resolutions where the CPU could otherwise excel.

---

# Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and the player's preference for frame rate versus visual fidelity. At 1920x1080, the High preset at 88 FPS provides a good balance of visual quality and smoothness, while Ultra at 68 FPS is still playable but offers diminishing returns for the extra GPU load. For competitive play where higher frame rates are prioritized, Medium at 109 FPS or Low at 139 FPS are better choices.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 72 FPS is the recommended choice, as it maintains a frame rate above 60 FPS while providing reasonable visual quality. The Low preset at 91 FPS is suitable for players who prioritize frame rate above all else, but the visual downgrade may be noticeable. High at 58 FPS and Ultra at 45 FPS are not recommended for multiplayer, as frame rates below 60 FPS can lead to a less responsive experience in fast-paced scenarios.

At 3840x2160, none of the settings achieve a consistent 60 FPS, so players should choose between visual quality and playability. The Low preset at 51 FPS is the only setting that approaches playable frame rates, but even this may feel sluggish in intense multiplayer moments. Medium at 40 FPS and High at 32 FPS are not recommended for competitive play, while Ultra at 25 FPS is only suitable for screenshots or single-player exploration.

The data shows that the Medium preset is the sweet spot for this combo across all resolutions, as it is the only setting where min and max FPS are recorded, indicating more stable frame times. At 1080p Medium, the 93-126 FPS range shows minimal variance. At 1440p Medium, the 61-83 FPS range is acceptable. At 4K Medium, the 34-46 FPS range is the most consistent of any 4K setting, but still falls short of playable standards.

For the best overall experience, running at 1080p with High settings provides a balance of visual quality and performance, while 1440p with Medium settings is a viable alternative for players with higher-resolution monitors. 4K gaming should be avoided unless the player is willing to accept low frame rates and reduced visual settings.

---

# Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about the limiting component in this combo. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops by approximately 34-35% across all settings. This is a moderate reduction that suggests both CPU and GPU are sharing the workload effectively at these resolutions. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (2200.5 in Cinebench R23) likely helps maintain frame rates at 1440p, where the GPU is not yet fully saturated.

The scaling from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is more severe, with average FPS dropping by approximately 44-45% across all settings. This steeper decline indicates that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at 4K. The RTX 5050's 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for the increased memory and bandwidth demands of 4K rendering, causing the frame rate to plummet. The FP32 throughput of 13.17 TFLOPS, while adequate for 1080p and 1440p, is not enough to sustain high frame rates at 4K in a game like Fivem.

The percentage drop from 1440p to 4K is consistent across all settings: Low drops from 91 to 51 (44% reduction), Medium from 72 to 40 (44% reduction), High from 58 to 32 (45% reduction), and Ultra from 45 to 25 (44% reduction). This uniform scaling suggests that the GPU's performance limit is being hit in a predictable manner, regardless of the visual complexity of the scene. The 4K results are all below 60 FPS, confirming that the RTX 5050 is not designed for 4K gaming in this title.

The resolution scaling data also highlights the CPU's role at lower resolutions. The fact that 1080p Low achieves 139 FPS while 1080p Ultra achieves 68 FPS indicates that the CPU can handle high frame rates when the GPU is not the bottleneck. This suggests that for players with 1080p monitors, the CPU is more than capable of driving the game, and any performance issues would be GPU-related at higher settings. The 88th percentile CPU ranking supports this conclusion, as the processor is clearly not the weak link in this system.

In summary, the resolution scaling pattern shows a system that is CPU-sufficient but GPU-limited at higher resolutions. The combo performs best at 1080p, where it can deliver smooth frame rates across all settings, and degrades progressively at 1440p and 4K. Players seeking the best experience should stick to 1080p or 1440p with Medium or High settings, and avoid 4K unless they are willing to accept significant performance compromises.