Fivem

Fivem’s measured performance with the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 shows a system that is heavily influenced by graphics settings and resolution, with the CPU providing a strong foundation for high frame rates at lower resolutions. The data indicates a clear scaling pattern where the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases, while the CPU’s capabilities are more evident at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the component roles, resolution scaling, and specific measured frame rates to provide a clear picture of what this combination delivers.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on a 3 nm process. Its base clock is 3.70 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The processor has a 36 MB shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU sits in the 96th percentile of all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 84003. Its nearest rival in terms of average score is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, which scores 83807, a delta of only 0.2% — meaning the 290K Plus is essentially tied with its predecessor in raw compute performance.

For a game like Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification platform, the CPU’s role is often significant due to the heavy server-side scripting and entity simulation. The high boost clock of 5.80 GHz is beneficial for single-threaded tasks, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7303 confirms strong per-core performance. However, the game’s frame rates at 1080p suggest that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at lower resolutions, as the system reaches 214 FPS on Low settings. The Passmark single-thread score of 4823 and the multithread score of 60860 indicate that while the CPU is very capable, the performance headroom is more than enough for Fivem’s typical load. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU can push frame rates well above 100 FPS even on Ultra settings, meaning its 24 cores and high clock speeds are sufficient to avoid limiting the GPU in most scenarios. The processor’s 125 W TDP and active production status suggest it is a modern, high-end part, but the benchmark results are the key indicator: the 290K Plus provides a robust platform that allows the RTX 3070 to operate near its full potential at lower resolutions.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is based on the Ampere architecture, featuring 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 1500 MHz, with a boost clock of 1725 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz, effectively 14 Gbps. The GPU has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. In synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 3070 holds the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 17208. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which scores 17083, a delta of 0.7% — meaning the RTX 3070 is marginally ahead. The GPU’s launch MSRP is 499 USD.

In Fivem, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 4K, the frame rates drop significantly, indicating that the 8 GB VRAM and the GPU’s compute power are the limiting factors. The measured data shows that at 4K Ultra settings, the average FPS is 38, which is a substantial drop from the 105 FPS at 1080p Ultra. This scaling highlights that the RTX 3070’s memory capacity and bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the demand exceeds what the GPU can efficiently handle. The Passmark G3D score of 22214 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821 provide context for the GPU’s raw compute capability, but the game-specific results show that the RTX 3070 is best suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, where it can maintain high frame rates without being overly taxed. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is a notable limitation at 4K, where texture and geometry demands can exceed that capacity, leading to the observed performance drop.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At 1080p, the system achieves high frame rates across all settings, with the Low preset hitting 214 FPS and the Ultra preset reaching 105 FPS. Moving to 1440p, the frame rates drop by roughly 30-40%: High goes from 135 FPS to 89 FPS, Low from 214 FPS to 141 FPS, Medium from 169 FPS to 111 FPS, and Ultra from 105 FPS to 69 FPS. This consistent drop of about one-third at each setting level suggests that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as the pixel count increases, but the CPU is still keeping up.

At 4K, the drop becomes more severe, especially on higher settings. High settings at 4K produce 49 FPS, a 45% drop from the 1440p result of 89 FPS. Low settings at 4K yield 78 FPS, a 45% drop from 141 FPS at 1440p. Medium settings at 4K produce 62 FPS, a 44% drop from 111 FPS at 1440p. Ultra settings at 4K produce 38 FPS, a 45% drop from 69 FPS at 1440p. This consistent ~45% drop from 1440p to 4K across all settings indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, as the resolution increase demands more from the GPU’s shading units and memory bandwidth. The CPU’s role becomes less significant at higher resolutions, as the frame rate is no longer limited by the processor’s ability to feed the GPU, but by the GPU’s ability to render the image. The data shows that the system is well-balanced at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the RTX 3070’s 8 GB VRAM and bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high frame rates, especially on Ultra settings where the average FPS drops to 38.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured frame rates provide a detailed look at how this combination performs across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers the highest performance. On Low settings, the average FPS is 214. Medium settings produce an average of 169 FPS, with a minimum of 144 FPS and a maximum of 194 FPS. High settings yield 135 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 105 FPS. These numbers indicate that the system is capable of very high frame rates at 1080p, with the CPU and GPU working well together to keep the frame rate high even on Ultra settings.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops but remains solid. Low settings produce an average of 141 FPS. Medium settings yield 111 FPS, with a minimum of 94 FPS and a maximum of 128 FPS. High settings produce 89 FPS, and Ultra settings yield 69 FPS. This resolution is a good balance between visual quality and performance, with the system still capable of exceeding 60 FPS on Ultra settings.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. Low settings produce an average of 78 FPS. Medium settings yield 62 FPS, with a minimum of 52 FPS and a maximum of 71 FPS. High settings produce 49 FPS, and Ultra settings yield 38 FPS. The frame rates at 4K are playable on Low and Medium settings, but the higher settings result in sub-50 FPS averages, which may not be ideal for a smooth experience. The data shows that the system’s performance is highly dependent on resolution, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination ranks 1247 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the 41.5th percentile of all tested combinations, meaning it performs better than about 41% of the other combos in the database. This ranking is notably lower than the individual component rankings — the CPU is in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 61st percentile of all GPUs — which suggests that the combination is not fully utilizing the CPU’s potential, likely due to the GPU being a relative bottleneck in this game.

The ranking indicates that while the CPU is a top-tier part, the RTX 3070 is a mid-range GPU, and the overall combo performance is limited by the GPU’s capabilities. The fact that the combo ranks in the middle of the pack suggests that there are many other combinations that deliver better overall performance in Fivem, likely with more powerful GPUs paired with similar or slightly weaker CPUs. The data shows that this combo is not a top-tier performer in this specific game, but it is also not at the bottom. The ranking of 1247 out of 3005 suggests a balanced but not exceptional system, where the CPU provides a strong foundation but the GPU limits the overall frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience depends on the target resolution. At 1080p, all settings are playable, with even Ultra settings producing 105 FPS. However, the Medium preset offers a strong balance, with an average of 169 FPS and a minimum of 144 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience even in demanding scenes. The High preset at 135 FPS is also excellent, providing a slight visual improvement over Medium while still maintaining high frame rates. For players seeking the highest frame rates, the Low preset at 214 FPS is the best choice, but the visual quality is significantly reduced.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the best choice, with an average of 111 FPS and a minimum of 94 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The High preset at 89 FPS is also acceptable, but the Medium preset provides a more consistent experience. The Ultra preset at 69 FPS is playable but may experience drops in demanding scenes. At 4K, the Low preset is the only one that guarantees a smooth experience, with an average of 78 FPS. The Medium preset at 62 FPS is borderline, with a minimum of 52 FPS, which may be noticeable in fast-paced gameplay. The High and Ultra presets at 49 FPS and 38 FPS, respectively, are not recommended for a smooth experience.

Overall, the data suggests that the Medium preset offers the best balance between visual quality and performance across all resolutions. At 1080p and 1440p, it provides high frame rates with a minimum above 90 FPS, while at 4K, it is the highest preset that remains playable. For players who prioritize frame rate over visual quality, the Low preset is the best choice, especially at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The average FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 169 FPS, with a minimum of 144 FPS and a maximum of 194 FPS.

Q: How does the combo rank in Fivem compared to other tested combinations?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combo ranks 1247 out of 3005 tested combos, placing it in the middle of the pack.

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 4K based on the data?

A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset produces an average of 78 FPS, which is the only setting that guarantees a smooth experience. The Medium preset at 62 FPS is borderline, with a minimum of 52 FPS.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all tested processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 84003.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score and its nearest rival?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17208, and its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT with a score of 17083, a delta of 0.7%.

Q: At what resolution does the system show the most significant FPS drop?

A: The most significant drop occurs from 1440p to 4K, where frame rates drop by approximately 45% across all settings, indicating that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 4K.