Fivem

The data for Fivem, captured with an Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, presents a clear picture of a system that is heavily constrained by the graphics card at higher resolutions. The measured frames per second (FPS) across the board show a predictable pattern of performance scaling, but the magnitude of the drops between resolutions and settings reveals where the bottleneck lies. This analysis breaks down the measured results to explain the behavior of this specific hardware combination in the multiplayer environment of Fivem.

Resolution Scaling

The most direct way to understand this combo's balance is to observe how average FPS changes when moving from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. The data shows a substantial performance cost for the increase in pixel count, which is a classic indicator of a GPU-bound scenario. At the High preset, the average frame rate falls from 119 FPS at 1920x1080 to 78 FPS at 2560x1440, and then further down to 44 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a significant drop of roughly 63% from the lowest to the highest resolution tested.

The pattern is similar across all settings presets. With the Low preset, the system achieves 189 FPS at 1080p, which is an exceptionally high frame rate that suggests the CPU and GPU are working with a lighter load. However, this number plummets to 124 FPS at 1440p and then to 69 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is a drop of 120 FPS, or approximately 63.5%. This consistent proportional decrease strongly suggests that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is the limiting factor; as the resolution increases, the demand on the GPU's pixel processing and memory bandwidth grows, and its performance degrades accordingly.

The data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is not the primary constraint in this configuration. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would remain relatively flat across resolutions, as the CPU's workload (game logic, physics, and draw calls) does not scale with resolution. Instead, the FPS scales inversely with resolution, which is the signature of a graphics card reaching its limits. The 44 FPS average at 4K High and 34 FPS at 4K Ultra are the clearest evidence of this, as these are the most demanding scenarios for the RTX 4060. The system is capable of delivering high refresh rate performance at 1080p, but it is simply not equipped to handle 4K gaming at high visual fidelity.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the optimal experience depends entirely on the user's target resolution and preference for visual quality versus frame rate. For a smooth, high-refresh-rate experience at 1920x1080, the Low preset is the only setting that breaks the 180 FPS barrier, averaging 189 FPS. This would be the choice for competitive play where frame rate is paramount. The Medium preset at 1080p offers a strong balance, with an average of 149 FPS and a minimum of 127 FPS, ensuring that even in demanding multiplayer moments, the frame rate remains well above the standard 60 FPS threshold. High at 1080p is also viable, delivering 119 FPS, which is still excellent for most displays.

At 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts. The Medium preset provides an average of 98 FPS, with a measured minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 113 FPS. This is a sweet spot for 1440p, as it offers a significant visual upgrade over 1080p while maintaining a frame rate that is smooth and responsive. The High preset at 1440p, averaging 78 FPS, is also playable, but the Medium preset offers a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The Low preset at 1440p is fast at 124 FPS, but it sacrifices too much visual fidelity for a resolution that is meant to look better. Ultra settings at 1440p, with an average of 61 FPS, are only borderline playable and are likely to dip below 60 FPS in busy scenes.

For 3840x2160, the data paints a less favorable picture. None of the presets achieve an average of 60 FPS. The Low preset is the most playable, with an average of 69 FPS, but this comes with significant visual compromises. Medium at 4K drops to 54 FPS, and High falls to 44 FPS. Ultra is the least viable option, with a 34 FPS average that is not suitable for a smooth experience. Therefore, if 4K is the target, the user must accept either Low settings for playability or lower resolutions for better visual quality. The best "experience" in terms of the balance between quality and performance is arguably the Medium preset at 2560x1440, which provides a high frame rate and a substantial visual improvement over 1080p.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is the central component in determining this system's gaming performance in Fivem. Its specifications in the fact pack explain why it behaves as it does. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. This is a modest memory configuration for modern gaming, and the data suggests it is a limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 8 GB capacity is likely sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the game may be exceeding this limit, causing performance to suffer beyond just raw compute limitations.

The GPU's clock speeds are listed as a base of 1830 MHz and a boost of 2460 MHz. This boost clock is relatively high, allowing the GPU to perform well when it is not otherwise constrained. The architectural capabilities, such as 3072 shading units and 24 RT cores, are present, but Fivem's performance is more heavily influenced by raw rasterization and memory throughput than by ray tracing. The benchmark results for the GPU show a Passmark G3D score of 19545, which places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, has a nearly identical average score of 17666, with a delta of -0.2%, indicating that performance is closely matched with that older card in synthetic tests.

In the context of Fivem, the GPU's role is clear. At 1080p, it has enough headroom to push very high frame rates, especially at lower settings. However, as the resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth demands grow, and the RTX 4060's performance drops off sharply. The difference in FPS between the Low and Ultra presets at any given resolution is also a signal of the GPU's workload. For example, at 1920x1080, the difference between Low (189 FPS) and Ultra (92 FPS) is 97 FPS, which shows how much graphical processing is required for the higher preset. The GPU is a capable performer for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, but its limitations are exposed at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Fivem, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 holds a rank of 1579 out of 3005 total tested combos. This places it in the middle of the pack, which is a logical result given the combination of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU. The CPU is an exceptionally strong performer, but the GPU holds the combo back from achieving a higher rank.

The CPU's overall benchmark score is 84003, which puts it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, has a very similar average score of 83807, with a delta of 0.2%, meaning the 290K Plus is only slightly faster. The GPU's average benchmark score is 17639, which is in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is very close to that of the AMD Radeon 780M, which has an average score of 17588 and a delta of 0.3%. This shows that the GPU is a mainstream part, not a high-end one.

The combo rank of 1579/3005 suggests that while the CPU is a powerhouse, the overall gaming experience in Fivem is dictated by the GPU's capabilities. There are likely many other combos with stronger GPUs that rank higher, despite having weaker CPUs. This ranking is a reflection of the system's overall balance and its ability to handle the game's demands. It is not a top-tier setup for Fivem, but it is also far from the bottom. The rank indicates that this configuration is a solid mid-range performer, capable of delivering good frame rates at mainstream resolutions, but it will not be competitive with systems that feature higher-end graphics cards.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 2560x1440 on the Medium preset?

A: The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 on the Medium preset is 98 FPS, with a minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 113 FPS.

Q: Is this system capable of a smooth 4K experience?

A: The data shows that no preset achieves an average of 60 FPS at 3840x2160. The Low preset averages 69 FPS, which is playable, but Medium, High, and Ultra average 54, 44, and 34 FPS respectively, which are not ideal for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus compare to its closest rival?

A: Its closest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K. The 290K Plus has an average benchmark score of 84003, which is 0.2% higher than the 285K's score of 83807.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1920x1080?

A: The Low preset averages 189 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 92 FPS. This represents a difference of 97 FPS, showing a significant performance cost for the highest visual settings.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested configurations in Fivem?

A: This combination of CPU and GPU ranks 1579 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the middle of the performance spectrum.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data was measured for the game Fivem with this specific hardware configuration. All values are in frames per second (FPS).

• 1920x1080
• Low: Average 189 FPS
• Medium: Average 149 FPS, Minimum 127 FPS, Maximum 171 FPS
• High: Average 119 FPS
• Ultra: Average 92 FPS

• 2560x1440
• Low: Average 124 FPS
• Medium: Average 98 FPS, Minimum 83 FPS, Maximum 113 FPS
• High: Average 78 FPS
• Ultra: Average 61 FPS

• 3840x2160
• Low: Average 69 FPS
• Medium: Average 54 FPS, Minimum 46 FPS, Maximum 63 FPS
• High: Average 44 FPS
• Ultra: Average 34 FPS

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is a high-end processor that provides more than enough computational power for Fivem. With 24 cores and 24 threads, it is designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads, and its benchmark scores confirm its high performance. The CPU has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, which ensures excellent single-threaded performance, a critical factor for many game engines. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 51731 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 7303 in single-core, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs.

In the context of Fivem, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, network code, and the overhead of managing the game world. The data indicates that it is not the bottleneck in this system. Evidence for this is the fact that the frame rates are heavily dependent on resolution and settings, which are GPU-centric variables. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see similar frame rates across different resolutions. Instead, we see a clear and consistent drop in FPS as resolution increases, which is a direct result of the GPU's workload increasing.

The CPU's high boost clock is likely beneficial for Fivem, as the game can be sensitive to single-thread performance. The processor's 36 MB of shared L3 cache also helps in keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency. The CPU's average benchmark score of 84003 is only 0.2% higher than its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, showing that it is at the top of its class. However, this immense processing power is effectively "waiting" on the RTX 4060 in most gaming scenarios. The CPU is capable of feeding frames to a much more powerful GPU, but in this configuration, its potential is not fully utilized due to the GPU's limitations. The CPU is a future-proofing asset, but for current Fivem performance, the GPU is the deciding factor.