Fivem
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 134 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 49 | 63 | 79 | 100 |
| 1440p QHD | 88 | 114 | 142 | 180 |
| 1080p Full HD | 134 | 173 | 216 | 274 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, In-Depth Analysis
Measured Fivem results for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile place this combination at rank 799 of 3707 tested combos. The data shows a consistently strong pairing, with Medium as the only preset that reports both minimum and maximum FPS at every resolution: 79 average at 3840x2160, 142 average at 2560x1440, and 216 average at 1920x1080. Low produces the highest raw frame rates, but the absence of stability data makes Medium the more complete measured option.
Settings Recommendations
Medium is the recommended preset across all three measured resolutions. At 3840x2160, Medium averages 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS. Low is faster at 100 FPS, but High drops to 63 FPS and Ultra to 49 FPS. Notably, High's 63 FPS average is below Medium's 67 FPS minimum, meaning the slowest recorded Medium sample was still faster than the High preset average. That makes Medium the safest high-quality choice at 4K.
At 2560x1440, Medium again provides the best balance in the measured data. It averages 142 FPS with a 121 FPS minimum and 163 FPS maximum. Low reaches 180 FPS, High 114 FPS, and Ultra 88 FPS. Medium's minimum of 121 FPS is higher than both High's average of 114 FPS and Ultra's average of 88 FPS. In other words, even the worst recorded Medium sample at 1440p is faster than the average of both higher-fidelity presets. The only reason to use Low is to maximize frame rate above the 142 FPS Medium result.
At 1920x1080, Medium averages 216 FPS with a 184 FPS minimum and 248 FPS maximum. Low averages 274 FPS, High 173 FPS, and Ultra 134 FPS. Medium's minimum of 184 FPS is above High's average of 173 FPS and well above Ultra's average of 134 FPS. Low remains the fastest setting in the entire dataset, but its stability cannot be evaluated because the measured rows do not include a minimum or maximum FPS value for Low. Across all three resolutions, Medium is the only preset whose variance is documented, and those documented ranges are strong enough to justify using it as the default.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the primary scaling component in the measured Fivem results. It has 24GB GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, and its core runs at 990 MHz base and 1515 MHz boost. The memory clock is listed at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective. The GPU delivers 31.80 TFLOPS FP32 with 10496 shading units, and its synthetic average benchmark score is 45152, placing it at the 84th percentile of all GPUs. It also records a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5871.
The Fivem measurements show the GPU's role through resolution scaling. With Medium settings, average FPS falls from 216 at 1920x1080 to 142 at 2560x1440 to 79 at 3840x2160. Higher resolutions require more pixel throughput, and the measured results follow that expected curve. The 24GB framebuffer means VRAM capacity is not visibly limiting these results; the more relevant figure is the high memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s, which supports the measured 4K Medium result of 79 FPS and the 4K Low result of 100 FPS.
In aggregate GPU benchmark terms, the RTX 5090 Mobile is not always the top scorer in its immediate comparison group. It sits 0.8% above the RTX 4070 Ti, which scores 44795, but it trails the Radeon Pro 5500 XT at 45384 by 0.5%, the Intel Arc A730M at 45592 by 1%, and the RTX 5880 Ada Generation at 45972 by 1.8%. These are synthetic average scores rather than Fivem-specific measurements, and the in-game measured data still shows a fast result.
The GPU's 95W TDP and 1515 MHz boost clock are the power and clock envelope under which these Fivem numbers were produced. From 1920x1080 Low at 274 FPS to 3840x2160 Ultra at 49 FPS, the RTX 5090 Mobile is clearly responding to the changing load of each preset. The 10496 shading units and high memory bandwidth provide the context for the GPU-heavy resolution scaling observed in the measured rows.
FAQ
Q: Which measured row in the dataset gives the highest average FPS?
A: 1920x1080 with Low settings, at 274 FPS average. The next fastest measured row is 1920x1080 Medium at 216 FPS, with a 184 FPS minimum and 248 FPS maximum. At 2560x1440, Low averages 180 FPS; at 3840x2160, Low averages 100 FPS.
Q: Why recommend Medium instead of Ultra?
A: Medium has a much higher average than Ultra at every resolution: 79 versus 49 at 3840x2160, 142 versus 88 at 2560x1440, and 216 versus 134 at 1920x1080. Medium also has documented minimum FPS values of 67, 121, and 184, while Ultra has no minimum or maximum data in the measured set.
Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 155H compare with its nearest CPU rivals?
A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 32697. It is level with the Core i5-14600T at 32707, 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32662, 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F at 32750, and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812.
Q: Is the RTX 5090 Mobile the highest-scoring GPU in its nearest rival group?
A: No. The RTX 5090 Mobile's average GPU benchmark score is 45152. That is 0.8% higher than the RTX 4070 Ti at 44795, but it is 0.5% lower than the Radeon Pro 5500 XT at 45384, 1% lower than the Intel Arc A730M at 45592, and 1.8% lower than the RTX 5880 Ada Generation at 45972.
Q: How does this combo rank relative to all tested Fivem combinations?
A: The combo rank in Fivem is 799 out of 3707 tested combos. That places the pairing in the upper portion of the database. The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus is 83 and the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus is 84, so the combo rank is consistent with two components that both sit near the same high tier.
Q: Are these Fivem numbers measured or estimated?
A: The database entry marks dataIsMeasured as true, so the Fivem FPS rows are measured results. The combo rank of 799 of 3707 is therefore based on measured in-game data, not synthetic prediction.
How This Combo Ranks
In Fivem, the Core Ultra 7 155H plus RTX 5090 Mobile pairing is 799th out of 3707 tested combos. That is a strong position in the measured field: most tested combinations finish behind it, while a group of higher-ranked configurations records better Fivem results. The rank is not the top position, but it is clearly in the upper portion of the database.
The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus is 83, and the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus is 84. Both components sit at similar high relative positions in their respective benchmark tables. The combo rank of 799 out of 3707 reflects that alignment: a pairing with two high-tier components lands in the upper part of the Fivem combo table rather than at the very top.
The rank also reflects the full measured profile, not just one favorable setting. The dataset includes Low, Medium, High, and Ultra at three resolutions, so the summary rank covers everything from the 1920x1080 Low result of 274 FPS to the 3840x2160 Ultra result of 49 FPS. The combination's final position of 799 of 3707 is the database's way of summarizing that entire measured spread in one Fivem-specific placement.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor in the Core Ultra Series 1, codename Meteor Lake, built on Intel's 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.80, a boost clock of 4.80, a 28W TDP, 2MB per-core L2 cache, and 24MB shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 15028 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1743 in single-core, along with 24873 in Passmark multithread and 3468 in Passmark singlethread. Its average CPU benchmark score is 32697, with a percentileVsAllCpus of 83.
The CPU's role in Fivem shows most clearly in the Low preset rows. Low reduces the graphics workload, which allows frame rates to climb toward the CPU's deliverable ceiling. The measured Low averages are 274 FPS at 1920x1080, 180 FPS at 2560x1440, and 100 FPS at 3840x2160. The 1920x1080 Low result is the single highest average FPS in the entire measured dataset, and the CPU's strong single-thread scores are the natural counterpart to that result.
Against its nearest CPU rivals, the Core Ultra 7 155H is effectively tied in aggregate score. It matches the Core i5-14600T at 32707, sits 0.1% ahead of the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32662, trails the Ryzen 5 7400F at 32750 by 0.2%, and trails the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812 by 0.4%. Those deltas are tiny, so the CPU's contribution to Fivem performance is better judged by the measured FPS rows than by synthetic score alone.
The 22 threads and 16 cores give the processor a wide execution context, and the measured results show that this mobile CPU can feed very high frame rates at lower settings. At higher settings, the workload shifts back toward the GPU, which is why the 3840x2160 Ultra result drops to 49 FPS. The CPU's multi-core score of 15028 in Cinebench R23 and its single-core result of 1743 both sit behind the measured 1080p Low result of 274 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |
| --- | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 100 | — | — |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 79 | 67 | 91 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 63 | — | — |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 49 | — | — |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 180 | — | — |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 142 | 121 | 163 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 114 | — | — |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 88 | — | — |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 274 | — | — |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 216 | 184 | 248 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 173 | — | — |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 134 | — | — |
At 3840x2160, the measured order from fastest to slowest is Low at 100, Medium at 79, High at 63, and Ultra at 49. Medium is the only preset with published minimum and maximum values, and its 67 FPS minimum is higher than High's 63 FPS average. That makes Medium the most trustworthy high-fidelity option at 4K.
At 2560x1440, Low averages 180 FPS, Medium 142 FPS, High 114 FPS, and Ultra 88 FPS. Medium's minimum of 121 FPS is above both High's average of 114 FPS and Ultra's average of 88 FPS. The 1440p Medium window of 121 to 163 FPS is the only stability data available at this resolution.
At 1920x1080, Low averages 274 FPS, Medium 216 FPS, High 173 FPS, and Ultra 134 FPS. Medium's minimum of 184 FPS is higher than High's average of 173 FPS and Ultra's average of 134 FPS. Across all three resolutions, Low is always the fastest preset in average terms, but Medium is the only preset with measured minimum and maximum values, making it the best-documented balanced choice in the dataset.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 100.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 79.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 63.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 49.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 180.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 142.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 114.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 88.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 274.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 216.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 173.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 134.0 |
Fivem with iUltra 7 155H + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RTX 5090 Mobile + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 155H + RTX 5090 Mobile
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.