Fivem

The data for Fivem with the Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER reveals a system where the GPU is the primary scaling factor across resolutions, yet the CPU's immense headroom ensures the experience remains fluid even at the most demanding settings. The benchmark results show a clear and consistent hierarchy: as resolution increases, the frame rate drops predictably, but the magnitude of that drop is heavily influenced by the graphics preset. This analysis breaks down the measured performance to show exactly where this combination excels and where its limits are.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1080p to 4K demonstrates that the RTX 4070 SUPER is the definitive bottleneck at higher resolutions. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 179.7 FPS at 1920x1080 to 117.8 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of approximately 34%. Moving to 3840x2160, the frame rate drops further to 63.5 FPS, which represents a 65% decrease from the 1080p figure. This steep decline is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios, where the rendering load on the graphics card outpaces the CPU's ability to feed it frames.

The scaling pattern is even more pronounced at Ultra settings. The system delivers 139.3 FPS at 1080p, but this falls to 90.6 FPS at 1440p and then plummets to 49.1 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is the lowest measured in the entire dataset, indicating that the combination of high resolution and maximum graphical fidelity is simply too demanding for this GPU to maintain a smooth experience. The data suggests that for 4K gaming, users should avoid Ultra settings, as the 49.1 FPS average is below the threshold for comfortable play on many displays.

Interestingly, the scaling from 1440p to 4K is less severe on Low settings. The frame rate goes from 187.9 FPS at 1440p to 104.8 FPS at 4K, a 44% drop. This is a smaller relative decrease compared to the High preset's 46% drop (117.8 to 63.5) and the Ultra preset's 46% drop (90.6 to 49.1). This indicates that at Low settings, the CPU begins to play a more significant role in limiting performance, as the GPU has less work to do per frame. The i9-14900K's strong single-thread performance helps maintain higher frame rates when the graphical load is lightened.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz. In Fivem, a multiplayer title that often relies on single-core performance for game logic and world simulation, the CPU's high boost clock is a critical asset. The benchmark results show that at 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 291.6 FPS, a figure that is likely constrained by the game engine's frame rate limits or the CPU's per-thread performance rather than the GPU. This score is the highest in the entire measured dataset, highlighting the processor's ability to handle the game's core simulation tasks without becoming a bottleneck.

The CPU's cache configuration also plays a role. It has a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 2 MB per core of L2 cache. This large cache hierarchy helps reduce memory latency, which is beneficial for the unpredictable, player-driven interactions common in multiplayer environments. The processor's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49872 and single-core score of 7040 further underscore its capability, though these synthetic benchmarks are more indicative of its general compute power than its specific performance in Fivem.

The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in most tested configurations. The frame rate differences between settings at the same resolution are far larger than any potential CPU-related variation. For instance, at 1440p, the difference between Low (187.9 FPS) and Ultra (90.6 FPS) is a massive 97.3 FPS, which is almost entirely attributable to the GPU's workload. The i9-14900K's role is to ensure that the game logic never stalls, and its performance in this regard is excellent, allowing the GPU to be the primary determinant of visual fidelity and frame rate.

How This Combo Ranks

In the context of all tested hardware combinations for Fivem, this pairing of the i9-14900K and RTX 4070 SUPER ranks at 327 out of 1792 combos. This places it in the top 18% of all tested systems, which is a strong showing given the vast array of hardware configurations that exist. The rank indicates that this is a high-performing combination that will deliver a smooth experience in most scenarios, but it is not at the absolute top tier, which would likely feature more powerful GPUs like the RTX 4090 or its successors.

The CPU itself is a top-tier part, ranking in the 97th percentile against all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 79824 puts it in close competition with the AMD EPYC 7413, which scores 80041 (a 0.3% difference). The i9-14900K also edges out the Intel Core i9-14900KF and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, both of which have average scores around 79240-79245, placing the i9-14900K roughly 0.7% ahead. This confirms that the processor is a leading choice for gaming, though its massive multicore capabilities (24 cores, 32 threads) are more than Fivem will ever utilize.

The GPU, while ranking in the 84th percentile against all GPUs, is where the combo's overall rank is tempered. Its average benchmark score of 42576 is very close to the NVIDIA RTX A6000, which scores 42653 (a 0.2% difference). The RTX 4070 SUPER also performs nearly identically to the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, which is only 0.3% slower. This suggests that while the GPU is powerful, it is not in the same league as the top-tier cards that would push this combo into the top 10% of rankings. The 327th rank is a reflection of the balance between a high-end CPU and a mid-to-high-end GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a consistent 60+ FPS?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 at High settings delivers 117.8 FPS, and even 3840x2160 at High settings achieves 63.5 FPS. For a rock-solid 60 FPS experience, 1440p is ideal, while 4K is playable at High but not Ultra.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 179.7 FPS at 1920x1080 to 63.5 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 65% reduction in performance, clearly indicating a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in Fivem?

A: The benchmark results indicate the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the system hits 291.6 FPS, showing the CPU is not a limiting factor. The frame rate scaling across settings at the same resolution is far more dramatic than scaling across resolutions.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900K compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-14900K's average benchmark score of 79824 is 0.3% lower than the AMD EPYC 7413's score of 80041. It is also 0.7% faster than both the Intel Core i9-14900KF and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF.

Q: What is the lowest frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average frame rate is 49.1 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. This is the only configuration in the dataset that falls below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Does the GPU's performance in Fivem align with its general benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER's average benchmark score of 42576 puts it in the 84th percentile. Its performance in Fivem is consistent with this, as it handles 1440p and even 4K at High settings well, but struggles with Ultra at 4K.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. With a boost clock of 2475 MHz, it delivers 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. In Fivem, this GPU is the determining factor for visual quality and resolution scaling. The memory capacity of 12 GB is sufficient for the game's textures at 4K, as evidenced by the playable 63.5 FPS at High settings, but the computational load of Ultra settings at 4K proves too much.

The GPU's performance trajectory in the measured data is straightforward. At 1080p, it can handle even Ultra settings, delivering 139.3 FPS. The 1440p results show it is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors, with 152.9 FPS at Medium and 117.8 FPS at High. However, the 4K results reveal its limitations. The 49.1 FPS at Ultra is a clear sign that the card's 80 ROPs and 224 TMUs are overwhelmed by the combination of high resolution and maximum effects. The GPU's transistor count of 35,800 million on a 294 mm² die is substantial, but it is not sufficient to brute-force 4K Ultra in this title.

The RTX 4070 SUPER's ranking in the 84th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 42576, places it in the upper echelon of graphics cards. Its proximity to the RTX A6000 (0.2% faster) and the RX 7650 GRE (0.3% faster) shows that it is a well-balanced card for its class. For Fivem, the data suggests that this GPU is best paired with a 1440p monitor for a high-refresh experience, or a 4K monitor if the user is willing to compromise on settings, sticking to High or below.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured frame rates, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user's display and performance goals. For 1920x1080, even Ultra settings provide a comfortable 139.3 FPS, so users can max out the game without concern. The 291.6 FPS at Low is excessive for most monitors and suggests the CPU is the limit, but it is a good option for competitive play where maximum frame rate is prioritized over visuals.

At 2560x1440, the sweet spot is the High preset, which delivers 117.8 FPS. This provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium (152.9 FPS) while maintaining a frame rate that is well above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra at 1440p yields 90.6 FPS, which is still smooth, but the 23% drop from High may not be worth the marginal visual gains. For 4K, the recommendation is to use High settings, which produce 63.5 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K (83.5 FPS) is also viable for those who prefer a higher frame rate buffer, but High offers a better visual experience without dropping below 60 FPS.

The Ultra preset at 4K is not recommended, as the 49.1 FPS average will result in noticeable stuttering and a less responsive feel. Low settings at 4K (104.8 FPS) are a viable alternative for players who value frame rate over fidelity, but High provides a much better balance. Overall, the data suggests that High settings offer the best combination of visual quality and performance across all resolutions, with 4K users needing to accept a 60 FPS cap.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete dataset for Fivem with the Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is as follows:

At 1920x1080, the system achieves 291.6 FPS on Low, 227.6 FPS on Medium, 179.7 FPS on High, and 139.3 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 52% reduction in frame rate, which is a direct result of the GPU's increasing workload.

At 2560x1440, the results are 187.9 FPS on Low, 152.9 FPS on Medium, 117.8 FPS on High, and 90.6 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra is 52%, mirroring the 1080p scaling pattern and confirming the GPU's consistent behavior across resolutions.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates are 104.8 FPS on Low, 83.5 FPS on Medium, 63.5 FPS on High, and 49.1 FPS on Ultra. The difference between Low and Ultra is 53%, showing that the relative performance gap between settings remains constant even as the absolute numbers decrease. The 4K Ultra result is the only measurement below 60 FPS, highlighting the GPU's limits at this resolution. The progression of scores across all settings and resolutions paints a clear picture: this combo is a high-performing 1080p and 1440p machine, capable of 4K with settings compromises.