Fivem

Fivem is a multiplayer modification framework, and its performance profile is heavily influenced by server-side scripting and the number of connected players, rather than just raw GPU output. In this analysis of the Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, the measured data reveals a system that is exceptionally capable across all tested resolutions, though the scaling of settings shows a clear trend. The benchmark results place this combination at rank 459 out of 1792 tested combos, indicating a top-quartile performer. The CPU, with its 24 cores and 32 threads, provides a robust foundation, while the GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory ensures that texture-heavy scenarios in Fivem are handled without issue. The data shows a system where the choice of graphics preset has a profound impact on the final frame rate, often more so than the resolution itself, which is a critical insight for users looking to optimize their experience.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows provide a clear hierarchy of performance across the four available presets. For users targeting the highest possible frame rates, the Low preset is the undeniable choice, delivering 260.3 FPS at 1920x1080, which drops to 172.8 FPS at 2560x1440, and remains competitive at 95.1 FPS in 4K. This preset offers a massive performance headroom, particularly for high-refresh-rate monitors, and the data suggests it is the most effective way to minimize latency in fast-paced multiplayer scenarios.

However, for a balanced experience that maintains high visual fidelity without sacrificing too much performance, the High preset appears to be the optimal default. The data shows that High settings yield 164.8 FPS at 1080p, 104.4 FPS at 1440p, and 62 FPS at 4K. This represents a significant visual upgrade over Low while retaining frame rates that are well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p. The Medium preset, which scores 204.7 FPS at 1080p and 131.6 FPS at 1440p, is a viable middle ground, but the jump from Medium to High costs only 39.9 FPS at 1080p and 27.2 FPS at 1440p, making High the more sensible choice for the visual gains.

The Ultra preset is the most demanding, and the data shows a substantial performance penalty. At 1080p, it produces 125.6 FPS, which is still playable, but at 4K, it drops to 48.9 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS target for many users. Given that the CPU’s high single-thread performance (evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7040) is crucial for Fivem’s server-side logic, the system is likely CPU-bound at lower settings. Therefore, the recommendation is to use the High preset for most users, as it provides an excellent balance of visual quality and performance. For those with 4K displays who prioritize smoothness, the Medium preset at 73 FPS offers a better experience than Ultra, while Low remains the ultimate choice for competitive play. The data indicates that the High preset is the sweet spot, offering a 32% performance increase over Ultra at 1440p and a 27% increase at 1080p, making it the most efficient use of the hardware’s capabilities.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900K perform in multi-threaded workloads that Fivem might use for server-side tasks?

A: The data shows the i9-14900K scores 49872 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 58674 in Passmark multithread tests. This puts it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79824, indicating it is a very high-end processor for handling complex calculations.

Q: Is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT's VRAM sufficient for Fivem at high resolutions?

A: Yes, the GPU comes equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. This is more than adequate for the texture and asset streaming typical in Fivem, especially since the measured average FPS at 4K High is 62, which shows the memory capacity is not a limiting factor in these tests.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: The measured data shows a dramatic difference. The Low preset achieves 260.3 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 125.6 FPS. This represents a 134.7 FPS drop, or roughly a 51% reduction in performance, when moving from the lowest to the highest graphical settings.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming on Fivem?

A: The benchmark results indicate it is capable, but with caveats. At 4K with High settings, the average FPS is 62, which is playable. However, at Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 48.9, which may not be smooth enough for all users. Using the Low preset at 4K yields 95.1 FPS, showing the system is capable of 4K with adjusted settings.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in terms of overall score?

A: The RX 9070 XT has an average benchmark score of 39647, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 575, has a score of 39703, which is a negligible 0.1% difference, indicating they are statistically tied in general performance metrics.

Q: What is the impact of the CPU's boost clock on Fivem performance?

A: The i9-14900K has a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz. This high boost capability is crucial for Fivem, which relies heavily on single-thread performance for game logic and server communication. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 7040 confirms its strength in this area.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is the primary driver for visual output in this Fivem configuration. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is a significant asset, as Fivem is known for its custom assets and mods that can consume large amounts of VRAM. The memory operates at an effective speed of 20.1 Gbps over a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. This bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and high-resolution detail rendering do not become bottlenecks, particularly at 4K where the pixel count is highest. The GPU’s boost clock of 2970 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz, allows for substantial processing throughput, which is reflected in its measured performance.

In the context of Fivem, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions and settings. The data shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the average FPS is 260.3, which is likely CPU-bound, given the i9-14900K’s strong single-thread performance. However, as the resolution increases to 4K and settings rise to Ultra, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The drop from 260.3 FPS at 1080p Low to 48.9 FPS at 4K Ultra demonstrates the GPU’s increasing workload. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test score of 7260 and the Passmark G3D score of 26795 provide a general indication of the GPU’s raw capabilities, which are sufficient to push high frame rates in less demanding scenarios. The GPU’s 128 ROPs and 4096 shading units are well-suited for the rasterization-heavy workloads typical of Fivem, ensuring that the visual output is not the primary bottleneck until the most demanding settings are applied. The data suggests this is a balanced pairing where the GPU is fully utilized at higher settings, while the CPU handles the multiplayer logic efficiently.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings. At 1920x1080, the system exhibits remarkable headroom. With Low settings, the average FPS is 260.3, which is exceptionally high and ideal for competitive play. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 204.7 FPS, a 21% decrease. High settings further reduce performance to 164.8 FPS, which is still very smooth for most displays. The Ultra preset, however, shows a significant cost, bringing the average down to 125.6 FPS. This represents a 51.7% reduction from Low, highlighting the computational expense of the highest visual quality.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales predictably. The Low preset averages 172.8 FPS, which is a 33.6% drop from the 1080p result. Medium settings yield 131.6 FPS, while High produces 104.4 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 84.4 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS threshold but shows a clear trend of diminishing returns. The difference between High and Ultra at this resolution is 20 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset’s additional effects are demanding. The data shows that for a 1440p monitor, the High preset is the most balanced choice, providing over 100 FPS while maintaining visual fidelity.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its limits under heavy load. The Low preset averages 95.1 FPS, which is impressive for 4K and shows the GPU’s strength in less demanding scenarios. Medium settings drop this to 73 FPS, a 23% reduction. High settings average 62 FPS, which is right at the edge of the standard 60 FPS target for console-like smoothness. The Ultra preset, however, falls below this threshold to 48.9 FPS, which may result in noticeable stutter in fast-moving scenes. This breakdown reveals that the system is highly capable at 1080p and 1440p across all settings, but at 4K, users must choose between High and Medium for a consistently smooth experience. The data indicates that the High preset at 4K offers a playable experience, but the Ultra preset is best reserved for less action-intensive scenarios.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1080p to 4K provides critical insights into the system’s bottleneck characteristics. Looking at the Low preset, the average FPS drops from 260.3 at 1080p to 172.8 at 1440p, and finally to 95.1 at 4K. This represents a 63.5% reduction from 1080p to 4K. The fact that the frame rate does not halve when pixel count quadruples suggests that the CPU is a significant limiting factor at lower resolutions. The i9-14900K’s high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 7040) is likely the primary driver of the high 1080p frame rates, as it can process game logic and draw calls faster than the GPU can render frames at such low resolutions.

This pattern shifts with the Ultra preset. The average FPS drops from 125.6 at 1080p to 84.4 at 1440p, and then to 48.9 at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is 61.1%, which is slightly less than the Low preset’s drop, indicating that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor at higher settings. However, the absolute frame rates are much lower across the board, showing that the Ultra preset’s visual effects place a heavy load on the GPU. The data suggests that at 1080p, the system is CPU-bound, as the GPU has headroom to render more frames than the CPU can feed it. This is evident from the 260.3 FPS at Low settings, which is a high number that many GPUs cannot reach.

As resolution increases, the GPU’s workload scales significantly, and the frame rate drop becomes more pronounced. The difference between 1080p and 1440p at Low settings is 87.5 FPS, while the difference between 1440p and 4K is 77.7 FPS. This indicates a relatively linear scaling pattern, which is characteristic of a balanced system where both CPU and GPU are working at high utilization. For the High preset, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 60.4 FPS, and from 1440p to 4K is 42.4 FPS, showing that the GPU is taking on more of the load as settings increase. The overall data implies that the Intel Core i9-14900K is powerful enough to avoid becoming a bottleneck at 4K, as the frame rates are still respectable, but the GPU’s performance is the deciding factor for the highest quality experience. The scaling behavior indicates that users with 4K displays should prioritize GPU-friendly settings, while those on 1080p can fully leverage the CPU’s strength.