Fivem

Fivem is a peculiar case in the benchmarking world. It is a multiplayer modification framework rather than a traditional standalone title, which makes its performance profile heavily dependent on server-side scripts, asset streaming, and the number of players in a given session. The data measured here for the Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT reflects a specific set of conditions, but the scaling patterns across resolutions and settings are clear enough to draw practical conclusions. This combination sits in the 972nd percentile rank out of 1792 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier for this game. The numbers reveal a system that is capable of very high refresh rates at 1080p but begins to strain under the demands of 4K, particularly when pushing the visual presets.

Resolution Scaling

The most immediate observation from the measured data is the steep cost of higher resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces an average of 189 FPS. Moving to 1440p drops that to 124.6 FPS, a reduction of roughly one-third. At 4K, the same Low preset yields only 71.8 FPS, which is a 62% drop from the 1080p figure. This pattern indicates that even at Low settings, the game becomes increasingly GPU-bound as resolution climbs; the RX 6700 XT is the limiting factor here, not the CPU.

The gap widens dramatically when using the Ultra preset. At 1080p, the average is 94 FPS, which is still playable. At 1440p, it falls to 58.7 FPS, and at 4K, it plummets to 34.2 FPS. This is a 64% performance loss from 1080p to 4K, showing that the Ultra preset is simply too demanding for this GPU at higher resolutions. The scaling from Medium to High is more moderate, but the trend is identical: 4K is only viable for the Low preset, and even then, the 71.8 FPS average leaves little headroom for the frame time spikes that are common in busy multiplayer servers.

The data suggests that this pairing is best suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming. At 4K, the system is consistently below the 60 FPS threshold unless you are willing to accept Low settings. The delta between 1080p and 1440p is smaller than the delta between 1440p and 4K, which is a classic sign of the GPU hitting its memory bandwidth and pixel throughput limits. The RX 6700 XT's 384.0 GB/s bandwidth is simply not enough to feed a 4K framebuffer with high-quality textures and effects in this title.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a 7 nm process node. It carries 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, which provides 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The boost clock is rated at 2581 MHz, with a game clock of 2424 MHz. These specifications place it in the 77th percentile of all GPUs, with its average benchmark score of 33721 points. In the nearest rival comparison, it sits within 1.3% of the NVIDIA RTX A5000, and it trails the AMD Radeon RX 6800 by only 0.7%. This means the 6700 XT is a solid mid-range performer, but it is not a high-end card.

In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced at higher settings. The Ultra preset at 4K produces an average of 34.2 FPS, which is a clear indication that the card is overwhelmed by the combination of draw distance, shadow quality, and post-processing effects. The 12 GB VRAM is likely sufficient for most Fivem servers, which often use custom assets that can exceed the memory limits of 8 GB cards, but the raw compute power is not there for 4K Ultra. The 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is respectable for 1080p, but the pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s is the bottleneck at higher resolutions.

The data shows that the GPU is the primary constraint in this system. At 1080p Low, the CPU is likely able to feed the GPU enough frames to hit 189 FPS, but the GPU falls behind as resolution increases. The game clock of 2424 MHz is a good indicator of sustained performance, but it cannot compensate for the limited bandwidth and memory bus width when dealing with 4K textures. For players aiming for high refresh rates, this GPU is best paired with a 1080p or 1440p monitor, where it can deliver 120+ FPS on Low and Medium presets.

Settings Recommendations

Given the measured rows, the optimal experience depends heavily on your target resolution. At 1080p, the Medium preset offers a strong balance, delivering 148.6 FPS. This is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate of most gaming monitors, and the visual uplift over Low is substantial. The High preset at 120.6 FPS is also viable, but it starts to approach the point where frame time consistency may suffer in crowded areas. The Ultra preset at 94 FPS is playable, but it introduces unnecessary risk of dips below 60 FPS during intense scripted events.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the sweet spot, producing 100.5 FPS. This is smooth and responsive, and it leaves enough headroom for the occasional server-side stutter. The High preset at 79.8 FPS is acceptable, but it is closer to the 60 FPS boundary, which can feel less fluid on a high refresh rate panel. The Low preset at 124.6 FPS is viable for competitive play, but it sacrifices too much visual fidelity for most users. The Ultra preset at 58.7 FPS is not recommended, as it sits below the 60 FPS target and will likely feel inconsistent.

For 4K, the only sensible option is the Low preset, which yields 71.8 FPS. This is usable, but it is not ideal. The Medium preset at 58.2 FPS is borderline, and the High preset at 47 FPS is too low for a smooth experience. The Ultra preset at 34.2 FPS should be avoided entirely. If you are set on 4K, you will need to accept the Low preset and likely lower the resolution scale in the game settings, though that data is not measured here. The pragmatic choice is to stick with 1440p Medium or 1080p High for the best overall experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full set of measured averages is as follows:

• 1920x1080: Low 189 FPS, Medium 148.6 FPS, High 120.6 FPS, Ultra 94 FPS.
• 2560x1440: Low 124.6 FPS, Medium 100.5 FPS, High 79.8 FPS, Ultra 58.7 FPS.
• 3840x2160: Low 71.8 FPS, Medium 58.2 FPS, High 47 FPS, Ultra 34.2 FPS.

These numbers show a consistent pattern: each step up in settings costs roughly 20-30 FPS at 1080p, while at 4K the cost is more severe due to the GPU hitting its limits. The gap between Low and Ultra is 95 FPS at 1080p, 65.9 FPS at 1440p, and 37.6 FPS at 4K. This indicates that the GPU's diminishing returns are less pronounced at lower resolutions, where the CPU can still push high frame rates, but the GPU becomes the absolute bottleneck at 4K.

The data also shows that the step from Medium to High is smaller than the step from High to Ultra. For example, at 1440p, Medium to High is a 20.7 FPS drop, while High to Ultra is a 21.1 FPS drop. This is typical of games where the Ultra preset enables expensive effects like ambient occlusion and volumetric lighting. The 4K numbers are particularly telling: the drop from Low to Medium is 13.6 FPS, while the drop from High to Ultra is 12.8 FPS. The GPU is struggling to maintain any level of performance at this resolution.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K?

A: Yes, but only at the Low preset, which produces an average of 71.8 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 58.2 FPS, and the High and Ultra presets fall to 47 FPS and 34.2 FPS, respectively. For a consistent 60 FPS experience at 4K, you would need to use Low settings and likely accept occasional dips.

Q: What is the best resolution for this hardware in Fivem?

A: The data suggests 1440p is the sweet spot. At Medium settings, the system produces 100.5 FPS, which is smooth and visually appealing. At 1080p, you can push High settings for 120.6 FPS, but the visual difference is less pronounced than the jump to 1440p.

Q: How does the RX 6700 XT compare to its nearest rivals in this context?

A: The RX 6700 XT scores within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 and within 1.3% of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 in average benchmark scores. In Fivem, this means it performs similarly to those cards, but the exact FPS will vary based on driver optimizations and server load.

Q: Is the Ultra preset ever worth using?

A: At 1080p, the Ultra preset yields 94 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive play. At 1440p, it drops to 58.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. At 4K, the 34.2 FPS average is too low for a smooth experience. The visual gains from Ultra are minor compared to High, so it is generally not recommended.

Q: Does the CPU limit performance in Fivem?

A: At 1080p Low, the system reaches 189 FPS, which suggests the CPU is capable of high frame rates. However, Fivem is known for being CPU-intensive in multiplayer scenarios. The i7-14700KF has 20 cores and 28 threads, which is more than enough for most cases, but server-side script performance can still cause frame drops that are not reflected in these averages.

Q: What is the expected frame rate at 1080p Medium?

A: The measured average is 148.6 FPS. This is a strong result that should provide a smooth experience on most high refresh rate monitors, assuming the server you are playing on is well-optimized.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with 33 MB of shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 44557 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 6290 points in single-core. These numbers place it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70104. It is nearly identical to the i7-14700K, with a delta of 0%, and it actually outperforms the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X by 0.4% in average score.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and asset streaming. The high single-core performance is crucial, as many server-side scripts are not well-threaded. The 5.60 GHz boost clock is excellent for this purpose. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system reaches 189 FPS, which indicates that the CPU is not the bottleneck at this resolution. However, in real-world multiplayer scenarios, frame times can become inconsistent due to server-side factors that are not captured in these averages.

The 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks, such as Discord or streaming software, without impacting game performance. The 33 MB of L3 cache helps with data locality, which is beneficial for the large asset files that Fivem servers often load. The nearest rival comparison shows that this CPU is effectively at the top of its class, with the only notable competitor being the i7-14700K, which is identical in performance. For Fivem, the CPU is more than sufficient, and the primary limitation in this system is the GPU, especially at higher resolutions and settings.