Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT produces a wide performance envelope in Fivem, ranging from 36.3 FPS at 4K Ultra to 189.7 FPS at 1080p Low. The data indicates a system that is heavily influenced by graphics settings and resolution, with the CPU's substantial headroom becoming apparent only at lower graphical loads. This analysis breaks down the measured results, contextualizes them against rival components, and provides actionable recommendations based solely on the provided benchmark data.

FAQ

Q: What is the best performance this combo achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest recorded average frame rate is 189.7 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This represents the peak of the measured performance envelope.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations in Fivem?

A: The combination ranks 984th out of 1792 tested combos. This places it in the middle of the pack, indicating that while it is not a top-tier performer for this specific game, it is also far from the bottom.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the CPU and its closest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D has an average benchmark score of 71660, which is 0.9% higher than the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270's score of 71056. It also leads the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X by 1.8%.

Q: How does the GPU's average score compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 33721, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6800's score of 33493. The RX 6700 XT also leads the NVIDIA RTX A5000 by 1.3%.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 127.6 on Low settings to 59.4 on Ultra settings. This is a reduction of 68.2 FPS, or roughly 53%, when moving to the highest quality preset.

Q: Does the GPU's memory bandwidth figure correlate with performance at 4K?

A: The GPU features a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 68.3 on Low to 36.3 on Ultra, showing that higher resolutions and settings place significant demand on the graphics subsystem.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data suggests that the optimal experience depends heavily on the user's display resolution and performance target. For users with a 1920x1080 display, the High preset delivers an average of 118 FPS, which is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay. Pushing to Medium increases the average to 149.4 FPS, offering a substantial boost for competitive play, while the Low preset's 189.7 FPS provides the maximum possible frame rate for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Ultra preset, at 95.2 FPS, is the only setting at this resolution that dips below 100 FPS, yet it still remains playable.

At 2560x1440, the High preset yields an average of 79.4 FPS, which is generally considered smooth for most players. The Medium preset offers a better balance for those seeking higher fluidity, with an average of 97.2 FPS. The Low preset, at 127.6 FPS, provides a significant competitive advantage. Conversely, the Ultra preset at 59.4 FPS is the only option that falls below the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting it should be avoided unless visual fidelity is the absolute priority.

For 3840x2160 displays, the data indicates a challenging environment for this hardware. The Low preset is the only setting that achieves a playable average frame rate of 68.3 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 55.8 FPS, and High falls further to 46.3 FPS. The Ultra preset, at 36.3 FPS, is not recommended for a smooth experience. Therefore, the recommended preset is High for 1080p, Medium for 1440p, and Low for 4K, as these settings provide the best balance of visual quality and performance in the measured data.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear pattern of GPU limitation. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 189.7 at 1920x1080 to 127.6 at 2560x1440, and finally to 68.3 at 3840x2160. This represents a 64% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K. This steep decline indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the primary bottleneck when graphical load is low, as the CPU is capable of feeding frames at a much higher rate.

The scaling pattern shifts when settings are increased. At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 95.2 at 1080p to 59.4 at 1440p, and then to 36.3 at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is 62%, which is similar to the Low setting. However, the absolute frame rates are much lower, reinforcing that the GPU is the limiting factor across all resolutions. The data shows that resolution scaling has a nearly linear effect on performance, halving the frame rate at 4K compared to 1080p, regardless of the quality preset.

The fact that the frame rate at 4K Low (68.3 FPS) is lower than the frame rate at 1080p Ultra (95.2 FPS) further confirms the GPU-bound nature of this combo in Fivem. The CPU's high multithreaded performance, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 59712, is not the limiting factor here. Instead, the RX 6700 XT's rendering capabilities determine the final output, with its 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 performance being the primary constraint.

How This Combo Ranks

In the specific context of Fivem, this hardware combination achieves a rank of 984 out of 1792 tested combos. This places the system in the 55th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning it outperforms a slight majority of other systems but is outclassed by a significant portion of the field. This mid-pack ranking is consistent with the measured frame rates, which are competitive at 1080p but struggle to maintain high refresh rates at higher resolutions.

The ranking suggests that while the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a top-tier processor, its pairing with the RX 6700 XT creates an imbalance in this particular game. The CPU's performance percentile is 96, indicating it is better than 96% of all CPUs. In contrast, the GPU's percentile is 77. The disparity between these two percentiles explains why the combo does not rank higher; the GPU's capabilities are the ceiling for performance.

Compared to other combos in the database, this system is not a leader. The rank of 984 indicates that many other pairings, likely those with more powerful GPUs, achieve higher frame rates in Fivem. However, it is also not a poor performer, as it still sits above the median. The data suggests that this combo is best suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming, where its ranking would likely be higher than at 4K, where the GPU is heavily taxed.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT plays a decisive role in the performance of this combo, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient for the measured settings, but the data shows that it is the primary factor in frame rate drops when settings are increased.

The GPU's clock speeds are relatively high, with a base clock of 2321 MHz, a game clock of 2424 MHz, and a boost clock of 2581 MHz. Despite these high frequencies, the GPU's performance in Fivem is limited by its overall compute power. The 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 40 ray tracing cores are not enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 36.3.

The relationship between the GPU's specifications and the measured results is clear. At 1080p, the GPU can push frame rates above 118 FPS on High settings, but at 4K, the same settings yield only 46.3 FPS. This 60% reduction in performance highlights the GPU's inability to handle the increased pixel count. The GPU's percentile rank of 77, compared to the CPU's 96, confirms that the RX 6700 XT is the weaker link in this pairing for Fivem.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data represents the exact average FPS measurements for this combo in Fivem, organized by resolution and settings preset.

1920x1080:

• Low: 189.7 FPS
• Medium: 149.4 FPS
• High: 118.0 FPS
• Ultra: 95.2 FPS

2560x1440:

• Low: 127.6 FPS
• Medium: 97.2 FPS
• High: 79.4 FPS
• Ultra: 59.4 FPS

3840x2160:

• Low: 68.3 FPS
• Medium: 55.8 FPS
• High: 46.3 FPS
• Ultra: 36.3 FPS

The data shows a consistent pattern: for every resolution, the Low preset offers the highest frame rate, and the Ultra preset offers the lowest. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 94.5 FPS, while at 4K, the difference narrows to 32.0 FPS. This narrowing suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU is so saturated that the quality preset has a smaller relative impact on performance. The average FPS across all settings is 122.4 at 1080p, 90.9 at 1440p, and 51.7 at 4K, providing a clear summary of the performance scaling.