Fivem

Fivem is a multiplayer modification platform that places unique demands on both processor and graphics hardware, and the measured results for the Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 reveal a configuration that scales predictably across resolutions and presets. The data set provides 12 distinct average FPS measurements, spanning three resolutions and four quality settings, offering a clear picture of how this specific combination behaves. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results, contextualizes the hardware's role, and provides actionable guidance based strictly on the measured figures.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded in the measured data for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 189.3 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset. This is followed closely by 147.4 FPS at the same resolution on Medium settings, indicating that at 1080p, the system has significant headroom.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in overall benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700K has an average benchmark score of 70074, which places it virtually identical to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700KF, which scores 70104 with a deltaPct of 0. It is also 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9115 (69887) and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (70420), showing a tight cluster at the top.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 holds a percentile rank of 66, meaning it outperforms 66% of all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 23181, and its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6600M, which scores 23321, a deltaPct of -0.6% relative to the RTX 4060.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this hardware combination?

A: The lowest average FPS in the data is 34.1 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 (4K) resolution with the Ultra settings preset. This represents the most demanding configuration tested and shows the system's limits at high pixel counts and maximum quality.

Q: How much FPS is gained by lowering settings from High to Low at 2560x1440?

A: At 2560x1440 resolution, dropping from High to Low settings results in a substantial performance increase. The High preset yields 79.4 FPS, while the Low preset achieves 122.5 FPS, representing a 43.1 FPS improvement or roughly a 54% increase in frame rate.

Q: Is the data for this benchmark measured or estimated?

A: The data for this benchmark is flagged as measured, with the field "dataIsMeasured" set to true. This indicates the FPS figures come from actual hardware testing rather than theoretical calculations or extrapolations.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 serves as the primary rendering engine in this configuration, and its specifications directly influence the Fivem results. The GPU operates on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz, providing the raw processing frequency for graphics tasks. Memory capacity sits at 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which becomes a critical factor at higher resolutions where texture data demands increase.

The GPU's compute capabilities include 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units, alongside 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores. These specifications translate to a peak FP32 throughput of 15.11 TFLOPS, which is the theoretical maximum for single-precision floating-point operations. In practice, the measured FPS data shows that this GPU is the limiting factor at 4K resolution, where even the Low preset yields only 69.8 FPS, while the CPU, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, remains underutilized at lower resolutions.

The RTX 4060's memory subsystem, with 8 GB of VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth, appears sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as evidenced by the high frame rates at those resolutions. However, at 3840x2160, the Ultra preset drops to 34.1 FPS, suggesting that the combination of pixel count and memory pressure overwhelms the GPU's capabilities. The card's 115 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU rating indicate a power-efficient design that allows sustained boost clocks, but the data shows that raw rasterization throughput, not power delivery, is the constraint at 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the system achieves 120.8 FPS, which drops to 79.4 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 41.4 FPS (approximately 34%). Moving further to 3840x2160 at High settings yields 41.8 FPS, representing another 37.6 FPS drop from 1440p, a 47% decrease. This scaling pattern indicates that the RTX 4060 is the primary bottleneck as pixel count rises, with the i7-14700K providing ample CPU headroom.

The Low preset shows the most dramatic resolution scaling, starting at 189.3 FPS at 1080p and falling to 122.5 FPS at 1440p, then 69.8 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops from 1080p to 4K are 35.3% for Low, 36.2% for High, 36.1% for Medium, and 63.8% for Ultra. The Ultra preset's steeper decline, from 94.2 FPS at 1080p to 34.1 FPS at 4K, highlights how maximum quality settings amplify the GPU's workload disproportionately at higher resolutions, likely due to increased shader complexity and memory bandwidth saturation.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the system is partially CPU-bound, as evidenced by the 189.3 FPS Low result, which approaches the limits of what the i7-14700K can feed to the GPU. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward GPU limitation, with frame rates still respectable but showing clear scaling. At 4K, the RTX 4060 is definitively the limiting component, as even the Low preset cannot maintain 70 FPS, indicating that the GPU's 272.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are insufficient for high-resolution rendering at playable frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 120.8 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay and suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Ultra preset at 1080p still achieves 94.2 FPS, making it viable for players prioritizing visual fidelity over maximum frame rates. The Medium preset at 147.4 FPS offers a balanced compromise, providing a significant boost over High while maintaining good image quality.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 79.4 FPS is the recommended choice for most users, as it stays comfortably above 60 FPS while offering solid visual quality. The Medium preset at 98.1 FPS provides a smoother experience for competitive play, sacrificing some graphical detail for a 23.5% frame rate increase. The Ultra preset at 62.7 FPS is borderline playable, but the drop below 60 FPS in demanding scenes could cause noticeable stuttering, making High the safer recommendation for consistent performance.

At 3840x2160, the data paints a less favorable picture for high-quality gaming. The Low preset at 69.8 FPS is the only configuration that maintains a playable frame rate, while Medium at 56.5 FPS and High at 41.8 FPS fall short of the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset at 34.1 FPS is not recommended for anything beyond screenshot purposes. For 4K gaming, the Low preset is the only viable option, and users seeking higher quality at this resolution would need more powerful hardware.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its strongest performance across all settings. The Low preset leads with 189.3 FPS, followed by Medium at 147.4 FPS, High at 120.8 FPS, and Ultra at 94.2 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 95.1 FPS, showing the significant cost of maximum quality settings. The progression from Low to Medium represents a 22.1% decrease, Medium to High a 18.0% decrease, and High to Ultra a 22.0% decrease, indicating a roughly linear relationship between preset and performance at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down proportionally. Low achieves 122.5 FPS, Medium 98.1 FPS, High 79.4 FPS, and Ultra 62.7 FPS. The absolute drop from 1080p is 66.8 FPS for Low, 49.3 FPS for Medium, 41.4 FPS for High, and 31.5 FPS for Ultra. Interestingly, the Ultra preset suffers the smallest absolute loss, suggesting that at higher settings, the GPU is already heavily loaded at 1080p, so the additional pixel count has diminishing marginal impact relative to the shader workload.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops are substantial across the board. Low yields 69.8 FPS, Medium 56.5 FPS, High 41.8 FPS, and Ultra 34.1 FPS. The total reduction from 1080p to 4K is 119.5 FPS for Low, 90.9 FPS for Medium, 79.0 FPS for High, and 60.1 FPS for Ultra. The percentage losses are 63.1% for Low, 61.7% for Medium, 65.4% for High, and 63.8% for Ultra, showing a remarkably consistent degradation pattern across presets at this resolution. This consistency suggests that the RTX 4060's memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s is the hard limiting factor at 4K, regardless of the graphical settings applied.