Fivem

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds the 170th position out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem. This places the configuration comfortably within the top 10% of all systems evaluated for this multiplayer title, demonstrating that this pairing is exceptionally well-suited to the game's demands.

The combo's ranking is particularly notable given the CPU's standing among all processors. The i7-14700F sits at the 94th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54097. Its nearest rivals in synthetic testing include the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X at 54450 (a -0.6% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D at 54681 (-1.1% delta). The fact that this Intel chip trades blows with premium Ryzen 9000-series parts suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck in Fivem's simulation-heavy multiplayer environments. Behind it sits the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 53469 (+1.2%) and the AMD EPYC 7313P at 53206 (+1.7%), further underscoring that the i7-14700F's 20-core, 28-thread configuration is competitive with enterprise-class silicon.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER achieves an 86th percentile ranking among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 48704. Its nearest rivals in the synthetic suite are the NVIDIA CMP 50HX at 49071 (-0.7%) and the Intel Arc A550M at 49737 (-2.1%), while the NVIDIA RTX A2000 at 47915 (+1.6%) and RTX A1000 Mobile at 47743 (+2.0%) trail behind. The GPU's position relative to these parts indicates that it delivers strong rasterization performance, which is the primary workload in Fivem.

What makes this combo rank as high as it does is the balance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The data shows that Fivem scales with both components, and this pairing avoids severe imbalances. The 170 rank out of 1792 combos represents a system that can handle the game's complex multiplayer scripting alongside high-fidelity rendering, a combination that many configurations fail to achieve.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with a transistor count of 45,900 million on a 379 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is a defining feature: 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory capacity is substantial for Fivem, which often sees high VRAM usage in densely populated servers with custom assets and heavy texture streaming.

Clock speeds are equally important for this title. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2340 MHz and boosts to 2610 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz (or 21 Gbps effective). These high clocks translate directly to the measured FPS results, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU's compute throughput becomes the limiting factor.

The GPU's raw rendering capabilities include 8448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It also features 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores, providing 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 44.10 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1). The pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s are relevant for Fivem's open-world rendering, where fill rate and texture bandwidth matter for maintaining consistent frame times.

In the context of Fivem's measured results, the GPU's role becomes clear when examining the resolution scaling. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 308.1 FPS, which drops to 153.1 FPS at Ultra. This 50% reduction from Low to Ultra at 1080p indicates that the GPU is heavily engaged at higher settings. At 3840x2160, the spread is even more pronounced: 115.2 FPS at Low versus 53.7 FPS at Ultra. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s is likely the key enabler for maintaining playable frame rates at 4K, where texture data demands are highest.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 offers the best balance of performance and visual quality. At this resolution, the combo achieves 124.9 FPS on High settings and 96.4 FPS on Ultra, both of which are comfortably playable for a multiplayer title. At 1920x1080, frame rates exceed 195.8 FPS on High, but the visual fidelity gain from 1440p is significant.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F's average benchmark score of 54097 is within 1.1% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D's 54681 and 0.6% of the Ryzen 9 9900X's 54450. This places it in a virtual tie with AMD's flagship consumer parts, despite having a 65 W TDP.

Q: Is the GPU's 16 GB VRAM sufficient for Fivem?

A: Yes, the 16 GB of GDDR6X memory is more than adequate. The measured results show consistent performance across all settings and resolutions, with no indication of VRAM-related stuttering. The memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s ensures that texture streaming in populated servers remains smooth.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 308.1 FPS on Low and 153.1 FPS on Ultra, a difference of 155 FPS. The Ultra setting still provides excellent frame rates, suggesting the GPU has headroom for maximum visual quality at this resolution.

Q: How does this combo rank overall?

A: The combo ranks 170th out of 1792 tested configurations, placing it in the top 9.5% of all systems. This is a strong result, reflecting the synergy between the 94th percentile CPU and 86th percentile GPU.

Q: What is the CPU's core configuration?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F features 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. It has 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache per core.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent scaling pattern across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest performance: 308.1 FPS on Low, 243.8 FPS on Medium, 195.8 FPS on High, and 153.1 FPS on Ultra. The step from Low to Ultra represents a 50.3% reduction in frame rate, which is a moderate penalty for the visual improvements offered by Ultra settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain impressive. Low settings produce 204.7 FPS, Medium yields 157.1 FPS, High delivers 124.9 FPS, and Ultra maintains 96.4 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra costs 56.7 FPS, a 37% drop, which is expected given the higher pixel count. Notably, even at 1440p Ultra, the system stays above the 90 FPS threshold, which is ideal for competitive multiplayer.

At 3840x2160, the performance profile shifts. Low settings still achieve 115.2 FPS, Medium drops to 90.5 FPS, High falls to 73 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 53.7 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, indicating that maximum settings at 4K stress the GPU significantly. However, the 16 GB VRAM and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth ensure that even this demanding scenario remains playable.

The scaling from Low to Ultra is most pronounced at 4K, where the difference between 115.2 and 53.7 FPS is 53.4%. This suggests that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher settings, while the CPU's strong single-thread performance (evidenced by a 5003 Cinebench R23 single-core score) keeps frame rates high at lower settings where the CPU has more influence.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. Its base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz provide substantial headroom for both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, which is critical for Fivem's server-side simulation and entity management.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves a 35443 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 5003 in single-core. The single-core result is particularly relevant for Fivem, which relies heavily on a few primary threads for game logic and network processing. The 4261 Passmark single-thread score reinforces this strength. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking versus all CPUs confirms that it is a top-tier part for gaming workloads.

The CPU's role in Fivem is evident from the measured FPS at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080 Low, the system hits 308.1 FPS, a figure that is likely CPU-limited given the GPU's capabilities. The 204.7 FPS at 1440p Low further suggests that the CPU can feed the GPU effectively even at high frame rates. The Passmark multi-thread score of 41765 and the 512810 data compression score indicate that the CPU handles background tasks and asset decompression without introducing frame hitches.

The nearest rival comparison shows the i7-14700F is only 0.6% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X in average benchmark score. This parity is surprising given the Ryzen's newer architecture, but the Intel chip's higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz likely compensates in latency-sensitive applications like Fivem. The CPU's 65 W TDP also means it can sustain high clocks without thermal throttling, which is beneficial for extended multiplayer sessions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, Ultra settings are clearly viable, delivering 153.1 FPS, which is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate common in gaming monitors. For players with high-refresh displays, even the Ultra preset leaves significant headroom.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the sweet spot, providing 124.9 FPS with excellent visual quality. Ultra at this resolution yields 96.4 FPS, which is still smooth but offers diminishing returns over High. For competitive play, the Medium preset at 157.1 FPS is ideal, as it maintains high frame rates while sacrificing minimal visual fidelity.

For 3840x2160, the recommendation is more nuanced. The High preset at 73 FPS is the best balance of quality and performance, providing a stable experience for 60 Hz displays. The Medium preset at 90.5 FPS is preferable for players with higher refresh rate 4K monitors, though the visual difference between Medium and High is often subtle in Fivem's environment. Ultra at 4K, with 53.7 FPS, should be avoided unless the player prioritizes maximum visual quality over smoothness, as it dips below the 60 FPS threshold.

The data shows that the Low preset is not recommended at any resolution, as it offers significantly lower visual quality for only modest performance gains. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 64.3 FPS (20.9% reduction), which is a steep price for the visual improvements. Instead, players should start with Medium or High and adjust individual settings as needed. Overall, the combo's strength lies in its ability to maintain high frame rates at 1440p with High settings, making this the recommended configuration for most users.