Fivem

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. In the context of Fivem, a multiplayer title that often relies on single-thread performance for game logic and physics, the CPU's strong showing in synthetic benchmarks is telling. Its 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5505 indicate a high ceiling for per-core throughput, which is critical for maintaining frame pacing in crowded multiplayer servers. The processor's multi-threaded capabilities are also robust, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39000 and a Passmark multithread score of 45887. This suggests that while the game may not use all 24 threads, the headroom prevents bottlenecks from background tasks or server-side simulation demands. The data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 351.3 FPS, a figure that heavily leans on the CPU's ability to feed frames quickly.

The cache hierarchy, featuring 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3, provides a substantial pool of fast memory for frequently accessed data. This is particularly relevant for Fivem, where asset streaming and script execution can create irregular memory access patterns. The processor's 93rd percentile ranking against all CPUs further underscores its position as a high-end part, with its average benchmark score of 47282 placing it nearly equal to the Intel Core i7-13700KF (-0.1% delta) and ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (-0.5% delta from that rival's perspective). The CPU's support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, along with its 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, ensures that data transfer to the GPU is not a limiting factor in this test scenario.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a formidable graphics card built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, featuring 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s, which is a decisive factor in high-resolution gaming. The GPU's boost clock of 2617 MHz and its 10752 shading units allow for massive parallel processing, while its 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated features. The card's raw compute power is reflected in its FP32 performance of 56.28 TFLOPS, which helps explain its ability to drive high frame rates in Fivem's open-world environments.

The GPU's 89th percentile ranking among all GPUs and its average benchmark score of 59188 position it as a top-tier performer. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tight cluster: it is 1.6% ahead of the Intel Arc A570M, 2.5% ahead of the Intel Arc A580, and 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X, while trailing the Intel Arc Pro A60 by 1.9%. This suggests that while the RTX 5080 leads this small group, the performance differences are not enormous. However, in Fivem, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 60.5, indicating that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are being taxed heavily. The card's 960.0 GB/s bandwidth is crucial here, as higher resolutions demand more texture data and pixel throughput. The transition from 1080p to 4K shows a clear scaling pattern that highlights the GPU's limitations at the extreme high end, despite its impressive specifications.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent and predictable scaling pattern across resolutions, which helps identify the primary bottleneck at each setting. Starting at 1920x1080, the combo achieves 351.3 FPS on Low, 275.3 FPS on Medium, 223.8 FPS on High, and 173.4 FPS on Ultra. Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly: 229.4 FPS on Low, 182.5 FPS on Medium, 145.3 FPS on High, and 110.9 FPS on Ultra. The most dramatic reduction occurs at 3840x2160, where the Low setting yields 129.2 FPS, Medium produces 101.7 FPS, High reaches 82.5 FPS, and Ultra falls to 60.5 FPS.

The percentage drops from 1080p to 4K are substantial. For the Low preset, the FPS falls from 351.3 to 129.2, a reduction of roughly 63%. For the Ultra preset, the drop is from 173.4 to 60.5, a reduction of about 65%. This uniformity in the relative decline across settings suggests that the limiting factor shifts from the CPU to the GPU as resolution increases. At 1080p, the high frame rates (351.3 FPS on Low) indicate that the CPU is capable of issuing draw calls faster than the GPU can render them, making the GPU the primary constraint even at this low resolution. At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck, as the pixel count quadruples and the 16 GB of VRAM and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth are pushed to their limits. The data implies that Fivem is not a purely CPU-bound title at these settings; rather, the GPU's rendering load becomes the dominant factor at higher resolutions, which is a key insight for users seeking to balance visual fidelity with frame rate.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i7-13700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 achieves a rank of 71 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem. This places the setup in the top 4% of all configurations, which is an exceptional result. The data indicates that this pairing is well-balanced for the game's demands, with neither component severely holding back the other. The CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 89th percentile rankings align well, suggesting that the system is not drastically mismatched. The high rank is consistent with the measured FPS figures, which show that the combo can push beyond 60 FPS at 4K Ultra and exceed 350 FPS at 1080p Low.

When interpreting this rank, it is important to consider the wide field of 1792 combinations, which includes both weaker and stronger parts. The 71st position means that only 70 other pairings produce higher average frame rates in this specific game. This is particularly notable because Fivem is a multiplayer title that can be sensitive to server-side performance and player count, yet the benchmark data is measured and consistent. The combo's performance is likely aided by the CPU's high single-thread score, which helps maintain frame pacing in busy areas, and the GPU's substantial memory bandwidth, which prevents texture streaming hitches. The data shows that this is a high-end pairing, but not the absolute best, leaving room for more powerful configurations to edge it out.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows provide a clear picture of how each preset impacts performance, allowing for a data-driven recommendation. At 1920x1080, all presets deliver high frame rates, with Low at 351.3 FPS and Ultra at 173.4 FPS. For competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors, the Low preset offers the highest headroom, but the High preset at 223.8 FPS still provides a fluid experience with better visuals. The Medium preset at 275.3 FPS is a strong middle ground. At 2560x1440, the High preset at 145.3 FPS is the best balance for most users, as it maintains a high refresh rate while offering improved visual quality over Medium (182.5 FPS) and Low (229.4 FPS). The Ultra preset at 110.9 FPS is playable but may not fully utilize a 144Hz monitor.

At 3840x2160, the choices become more constrained. The High preset at 82.5 FPS is the recommended setting for a smooth 4K experience, as it stays comfortably above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 101.7 FPS is also viable and provides a higher frame rate, but the visual difference between Medium and High may be worth the slight FPS cost. The Ultra preset at 60.5 FPS is right at the edge of playability for 60Hz displays, but it leaves no room for frame drops in busy scenes. The Low preset at 129.2 FPS is not recommended for 4K, as it compromises visual fidelity for a frame rate that exceeds the refresh rate of most 4K displays. Overall, the data suggests that the High preset is the sweet spot for this combo across all resolutions, offering a balance of visual quality and performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080: The lowest resolution tested shows the combo's maximum potential. Low settings produce 351.3 FPS, Medium yields 275.3 FPS, High reaches 223.8 FPS, and Ultra delivers 173.4 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 50.6% drop, indicating that the GPU is increasingly burdened by higher graphical fidelity, but the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution.

2560x1440: At this resolution, the frame rates are still high but show a clear step down. Low settings achieve 229.4 FPS, Medium produces 182.5 FPS, High reaches 145.3 FPS, and Ultra drops to 110.9 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 51.7%, which is similar to 1080p, suggesting a consistent GPU scaling pattern.

3840x2160: The 4K results show the most significant performance impact. Low settings generate 129.2 FPS, Medium yields 101.7 FPS, High reaches 82.5 FPS, and Ultra falls to 60.5 FPS. The frame rate at Ultra is exactly at the 60 FPS threshold, making it a marginal choice for 60Hz displays. The 52.9% drop from Low to Ultra is slightly larger than at lower resolutions, indicating that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources are being saturated.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest average FPS is 351.3, measured at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 47282, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i7-13700KF (47334) and 0.3% higher than the AMD EPYC 4364P (47131).

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to the Intel Arc A580?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 59188, which is 2.5% higher than the Intel Arc A580's score of 57756.

Q: Is the combo capable of 4K gaming at Ultra settings?

A: Yes, but it is marginal. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 60.5, which is just above the 60 FPS target.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination ranks 71st out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem.

Q: Which settings preset provides the best experience at 2560x1440?

A: The High preset at 145.3 FPS provides the best balance, as it offers a high frame rate while maintaining better visual quality than Medium (182.5 FPS) or Low (229.4 FPS).