Fivem

The Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination delivers a versatile Fivem experience, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions and presets. The data shows this pairing ranks 1102nd out of 1792 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle segment of the database, yet it still achieves playable frame rates at most settings below 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured results, contextualizes the hardware’s standing, and outlines the optimal configuration for this specific game.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall rank of this CPU and GPU combo in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 1102nd out of 1792 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the 38th percentile of all tested systems.

Q: Which preset at 1080p offers the highest average frame rate?

A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 yields the highest measured average of 178.8 FPS, which is significantly higher than the High preset’s 109.5 FPS.

Q: Can this hardware handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 31.8 FPS, while the High preset averages 39.9 FPS. The Low preset at 4K achieves 62.4 FPS, which is the only 4K configuration that approaches a smooth 60 FPS target.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Core i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35355. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14400 (35336) and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600T (35256), but it is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-13800H (35416).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it relate to Fivem?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This bandwidth supports the texture streaming demands of a multiplayer sandbox, though it is not a top-tier figure.

Q: What is the FPS difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 113.3 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 53.6 FPS. This represents a 59.7 FPS drop, or roughly a 53% reduction in average frame rate.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this configuration at rank 1102 out of 1792 tested combinations in Fivem. This position indicates that while the hardware is not at the current-generation, it sits comfortably above the median of the database. The CPU, an Intel Core i7-12700KF, is a strong contributor; its average benchmark score of 35355 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. This suggests the processor is not the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The GPU, however, is a different story; the RTX 2070 SUPER’s average benchmark score of 22206 puts it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, which is a more modest standing that aligns with its mid-range classification.

The deltaPct values against the CPU’s nearest rivals are razor-thin. The i7-12700KF is 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i9-12900HX (35289) and 0.1% faster than the Intel Core i5-14400 (35336), but it trails the Intel Core i7-13800H by 0.2%. These margins are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning the CPU provides consistent, predictable performance that will not skew the Fivem results. On the GPU side, the RTX 2070 SUPER is 2.5% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (21670) and 0.9% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (22006), but it is 2.3% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile (22729). This positioning suggests the GPU is the limiting factor in this combo, particularly at higher resolutions.

Given the combo’s rank, the frame rates observed in Fivem are reasonable. The hardware manages to deliver playable performance at 1080p and 1440p with most presets, but it struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with maximum settings. The data indicates that this is a balanced pairing for 1080p gaming, with the CPU having headroom to spare.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo depends on the target resolution. For players seeking the highest possible smoothness at 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 178.8 FPS, which is far beyond the refresh rate of most monitors. The Medium preset at 1080p still offers a very playable 137.3 FPS, making it a strong choice for balancing visual fidelity and performance. The High preset at 1080p drops to 109.5 FPS, which remains smooth, but the Ultra preset falls to 82.7 FPS, which is acceptable but less fluid.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the clear winner for competitive play, averaging 113.3 FPS. The Medium preset at 93 FPS is also excellent, providing a good middle ground. The High preset at 70.4 FPS is playable, but the Ultra preset at 53.6 FPS starts to show strain. For those who prioritize a consistent 60+ FPS experience, the Medium preset at 1440p is the best compromise, as it offers a 65% improvement over Ultra while maintaining a high level of visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the situation is more challenging. The Low preset averages 62.4 FPS, which is the only 4K setting that meets the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset at 48.8 FPS and High at 39.9 FPS are below ideal smoothness, and the Ultra preset at 31.8 FPS is not recommended for a fluid experience. The data suggests that 4K gaming is possible only with significant sacrifices in visual quality. The best overall experience, balancing performance and visuals, is the Medium preset at 1440p, which provides a robust 93 FPS average.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rates range from 178.8 FPS on Low to 82.7 FPS on Ultra. The progression from Low to Medium to High shows a consistent drop: 178.8 to 137.3 (a 41.5 FPS decrease), then to 109.5 (a 27.8 FPS decrease), and finally to 82.7 (a 26.8 FPS decrease). This indicates that each preset step costs roughly 20-30% performance at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern emerges but with lower absolute values. The Low preset averages 113.3 FPS, Medium drops to 93 FPS, High to 70.4 FPS, and Ultra to 53.6 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 59.7 FPS, which is a larger absolute drop than at 1080p (96.1 FPS difference), but the relative percentage is similar. The 1440p results show that the GPU is beginning to become a limiting factor, as the jump from Medium to High costs 22.6 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs 16.8 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the performance takes a significant hit. The Low preset averages 62.4 FPS, which is a 45% reduction from the same preset at 1440p. The Medium preset at 48.8 FPS, High at 39.9 FPS, and Ultra at 31.8 FPS all fall below the 60 FPS threshold. The 4K data shows a linear degradation, with each preset step costing roughly 8-10 FPS. This suggests that the RTX 2070 SUPER’s 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p but insufficient for maintaining high frame rates at 4K with demanding settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER plays a critical role in defining the Fivem experience, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. These specifications are mid-range by modern standards, and the data shows they are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but limit 4K performance.

The GPU’s core clocks are 1605 MHz base and 1770 MHz boost, which are modest figures that allow the card to maintain reasonable temperatures and power consumption (215 W TDP). The card’s compute capabilities include 9.062 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 18.12 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1), which are adequate for the DirectX 12 workload of Fivem. The GPU also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering features.

In the context of Fivem, the GPU’s benchmark scores highlight its relative position. The passmark G3D score of 18169 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1651 indicate solid DirectX 12 performance. The GPU’s percentile rank of 65th among all GPUs means it outperforms a majority of cards but is not a high-end solution. The nearest rivals show it is 2.5% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (21670) and 0.9% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (22006), but 2.3% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile (22729). This positioning explains why the measured FPS in Fivem scales well at 1080p but drops sharply at 4K, where the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute power become limiting factors. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is also a consideration; while it is adequate for current Fivem maps, it may be strained by high-resolution textures, as evidenced by the Ultra preset’s 31.8 FPS at 4K.