Fivem
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 86 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 40 | 50 | 64 |
| 1440p QHD | 56 | 73 | 91 | 115 |
| 1080p Full HD | 86 | 111 | 138 | 175 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis
FAQ
Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 9060 combo rank in Fivem?
A: This combo ranks 1714 out of 3005 tested combinations. That places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, meaning a majority of tested systems deliver higher framerates in Fivem.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?
A: At 1920x1080, the combo reaches 175 FPS on Low settings and 86 FPS on Ultra. At 2560x1440, it drops to 115 FPS on Low and 56 FPS on Ultra. At 3840x2160, it falls to 64 FPS on Low and 31 FPS on Ultra. The data shows 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the combo consistently exceeds 60 FPS across all settings.
Q: Which settings preset provides the highest average FPS?
A: The Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at every resolution: 175 FPS at 1920x1080, 115 FPS at 2560x1440, and 64 FPS at 3840x2160. The Ultra preset delivers the lowest: 86 FPS, 56 FPS, and 31 FPS respectively.
Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The RX 9060's average benchmark score is 16014. It sits within 1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129, delta -0.7%) and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852, delta 1%). The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 trails by 2.1%.
Q: How does the Core i5-13400F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?
A: The i5-13400F's average benchmark score is 25292. It is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25284, delta 0%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25201, delta 0.4%). The Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D both lead by 0.3%.
Q: What is the minimum FPS at Medium settings?
A: The measured minimum FPS at Medium settings are 117 FPS at 1920x1080, 77 FPS at 2560x1440, and 43 FPS at 3840x2160. The corresponding maximum FPS are 159, 105, and 58.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is the primary driver of Fivem's visual output, and its specifications directly explain the measured performance. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, the GPU provides 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest memory configuration for a modern GPU, and in a multiplayer game like Fivem, which often involves dense urban environments with many player models, texture streaming can pressure this bandwidth. The 64 ROPs and 112 TMUs handle pixel and texture throughput, with a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s.
The GPU's clock behavior is notable. The base clock is 1700 MHz, but the boost clock reaches 2990 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz. This wide boost range means the card can aggressively scale its frequency under load, which is beneficial for frame rate stability. The FP32 throughput is 21.43 TFLOPS, a figure that aligns with its performance class. The GPU's average benchmark score is 16014, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, scores 16129, a delta of -0.7%, meaning the RX 9060 is essentially performance-equivalent to that card, while the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852) is 1% behind.
In Fivem specifically, the GPU's role is evident in the scaling between settings presets. At 1920x1080, dropping from Ultra to Low increases the average FPS from 86 to 175, a gain of 89 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same drop increases FPS from 56 to 115, a gain of 59 FPS. At 3840x2160, the gain is 33 FPS, from 31 to 64. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU is heavily stressed by higher settings, particularly at 4K, where even the Low preset yields only 64 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for this game's textures, but the 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth likely become a limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings, as the framerate drops disproportionately at 3840x2160.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-13400F provides the processing backbone for Fivem, which involves both game logic and handling the many connected players in a multiplayer session. This CPU features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The 20 MB shared L3 cache is a key asset for a game that may repeatedly access the same simulation data. The CPU's benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 11068. Single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3191 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1996.
The CPU's average benchmark score is 25292, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, scores 25284, a delta of 0%, making them effectively identical. The Intel Core 5 120 (25362) and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25365) both lead by 0.3%, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25201) trails by 0.4%. This indicates the i5-13400F is positioned in a very competitive performance band, but its ranking in Fivem is not determined by raw CPU power alone.
In Fivem, the CPU's role is less about the average FPS and more about maintaining a stable frame time, especially in crowded areas. The 10-core configuration with 16 threads allows for efficient distribution of game tasks. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz ensures that single-threaded tasks, which are common in game simulation, can run at high speed. The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the FPS reaches 175, which is likely a CPU-bound scenario, as the GPU is under less stress. The measured minimum FPS at Medium settings (117 FPS at 1080p) suggests the CPU can sustain a high frame rate without significant dips. However, at 3840x2160, the FPS drops to 31 at Ultra, indicating that the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo of the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 ranks 1714 out of 3005 tested combinations in Fivem. This rank of 1714 places it in the 57th percentile of all combos, meaning 57% of tested systems perform better. This is a mid-pack result, which is somewhat surprising given that both components have respectable individual benchmark scores. The CPU is in the 77th percentile, and the GPU is in the 59th percentile, but their combined performance in Fivem does not boost them to a top-tier position.
The rank reflects the game's specific demands. Fivem is a multiplayer mod for a game that can be sensitive to both CPU and GPU performance. The combo's individual component scores suggest it should be capable, but the measured FPS data indicates it struggles at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, the combo only achieves 40 FPS on High and 31 FPS on Ultra, which are below the 60 FPS target most players seek. Even at 2560x1440, the Ultra preset yields only 56 FPS.
Compared to other combos in the database, this rank of 1714 suggests that many systems with different pairings outperform it. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus may be a limiting factor in a game that can have many unique assets loaded simultaneously. The CPU's performance is solid, but it may not be enough to compensate for the GPU's memory bandwidth constraints at higher settings. The data shows that this combo is best suited for 1920x1080 gaming, where it can exceed 100 FPS on Medium and High settings, but it falls short of the performance needed for smooth 4K or high-refresh 1440p gaming.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which settings preset offers the best experience for this combo. The primary target should be a stable frame rate above 60 FPS, with higher being preferable for a smoother multiplayer experience. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 111 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play. The Medium preset delivers 138 FPS, which is even better, with a minimum FPS of 117. The Low preset delivers 175 FPS, but the visual quality trade-off may not be worth it. The Ultra preset drops to 86 FPS, which is still playable but leaves less headroom for frame drops.
At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 73 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset delivers 91 FPS, with a minimum of 77 FPS, making it the best balance of visual quality and performance. The Low preset delivers 115 FPS, but the Ultra preset drops to 56 FPS, which is below the target. At 3840x2160, the High preset delivers 40 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 31 FPS, both of which are too low for a smooth experience. The Low preset at 4K delivers 64 FPS, which is the only acceptable option at that resolution.
The data indicates that the Medium preset at 2560x1440 is the sweet spot for this combo, offering 91 FPS with a minimum of 77 FPS, which provides a good margin above the 60 FPS threshold. For players prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity, the Low preset at 1920x1080 delivers 175 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution, as it consistently produces the lowest frame rates, including a 31 FPS result at 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this combo in Fivem is as follows.
At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 175 FPS. The Medium preset delivers an average of 138 FPS, with a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS. The High preset delivers an average of 111 FPS. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 86 FPS. This shows a clear progression, with the Ultra preset being 89 FPS slower than the Low preset.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers an average of 115 FPS. The Medium preset delivers an average of 91 FPS, with a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 105 FPS. The High preset delivers an average of 73 FPS. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 56 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 59 FPS, which is narrower than at 1080p, indicating a growing GPU bottleneck.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset delivers an average of 64 FPS. The Medium preset delivers an average of 50 FPS, with a minimum of 43 FPS and a maximum of 58 FPS. The High preset delivers an average of 40 FPS. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 31 FPS. At 4K, the frame rates are significantly lower across the board, with the Ultra preset falling below 32 FPS, which is a common threshold for playability.
The data shows that the combo's performance scales predictably with resolution and settings. At 1080p, the combo can handle all presets, though the Ultra preset's 86 FPS is the weakest result. At 1440p, the Ultra preset's 56 FPS is below the 60 FPS target. At 4K, only the Low preset achieves a playable frame rate. The Medium preset at 1440p offers the best combination of visual quality and frame rate, with a minimum FPS of 77, which is the highest minimum FPS across all resolutions and settings except for the Medium preset at 1080p.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-13400F
AMD Radeon RX 9060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 50.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 40.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 31.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 115.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 91.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 73.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 56.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 175.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 138.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 111.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 86.0 |
Fivem with ii5-13400F + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RX 9060 + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-13400F + RX 9060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.