Fivem
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 148 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 54 | 71 | 85 | 110 |
| 1440p QHD | 99 | 123 | 157 | 197 |
| 1080p Full HD | 146 | 188 | 239 | 304 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, In-Depth Analysis
Fivem’s performance with the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX demonstrates a classic high-resolution GPU bottleneck, but the data also reveals surprisingly strong CPU headroom at lower settings. The measured frame rates show that while the combination is extremely capable, its behavior shifts dramatically depending on whether the workload is pixel-bound or draw-call-bound. Benchmark results indicate this pairing is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming, with 4K Ultra being the only area where the system struggles to maintain smooth motion.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and clearly identifies the GPU as the primary limiting component at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 303.6 FPS at 1920x1080 to 110.4 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of 63.6%. This scaling pattern is typical for a game like Fivem, where lower settings shift the burden onto the graphics card’s raw throughput. The RX 7900 XTX, with its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth, is being pushed hard at 4K, but the numbers show it still delivers playable performance at Low and Medium.
Moving from 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings reveals the most punishing drop: 98.9 FPS down to 53.8 FPS, a 45.6% decrease. This indicates that at Ultra, the game’s effects and draw distances are overwhelming even a flagship GPU. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at High settings is much gentler, with a 34.5% drop from 187.9 FPS to 123 FPS, suggesting that 1440p is the sweet spot for this combo. The data shows that the CPU is not the bottleneck at any resolution when settings are High or above, as the frame rate consistently scales with pixel count rather than staying flat.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications directly explain the measured results. The GPU’s boost clock of 2498 MHz and game clock of 2365 MHz provide the computational muscle needed for high frame rates, while the 24 GB of VRAM ensures that even the most texture-heavy Fivem servers will not run out of memory. The 384-bit memory bus and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth are critical for 4K performance, as seen in the 85.1 FPS average at Medium settings on 3840x2160.
Benchmark results for the GPU show it ranks in the 85th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 44019. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, scores 44900, putting the RX 7900 XTX 2% behind in raw compute. However, in Fivem, the combination’s measured performance at 1440p High (123 FPS) suggests that the GPU’s strengths are well-aligned with the game’s engine. The FP32 throughput of 61.39 TFLOPS and 6144 shading units provide ample headroom for particle effects and vehicle models, which are common in multiplayer scenarios. The data indicates that the GPU is the reason this combo can hit 303.6 FPS at 1080p Low, a result that would be impossible if the CPU were holding things back.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-13400F plays a supporting role in this configuration, but its specifications ensure that it never becomes a liability. With 10 cores and 16 threads, the CPU provides enough parallel processing power for Fivem’s server-side scripting and client-side simulation. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz is crucial for single-threaded tasks, which Fivem relies on heavily for physics and AI updates. The CPU’s 20 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce latency when accessing frequently used game data.
The CPU’s benchmark scores confirm its capability: a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21279 and a single-core score of 3004. These numbers place it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25236. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D, scores 25365, a difference of only 0.5% in the CPU’s favor. In Fivem, the CPU’s role is most evident at 1080p Low, where the frame rate reaches 303.6 FPS. This high number suggests that the CPU can feed the GPU with enough draw calls to saturate it, but it does not become the limiting factor even at this extreme. The 65 W TDP and dual-channel memory support are sufficient for this workload, and the data shows no signs of CPU throttling or bottlenecking across all tested resolutions and settings.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 4K smoothly?
A: Yes, but only at Medium settings or below. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 is 85.1 FPS on Medium and 110.4 FPS on Low, while High and Ultra drop to 71.4 FPS and 53.8 FPS, respectively.
Q: What is the best resolution for this pairing?
A: 2560x1440 is the sweet spot. At High settings, the average FPS is 123, and at Low it jumps to 196.6 FPS, providing a balance between visual quality and high refresh rates.
Q: Is the CPU holding back the GPU in any scenario?
A: No. The frame rates scale consistently with resolution, indicating the GPU is the bottleneck at all settings. The CPU’s 3DMark max threads score of 7307 and single-thread score of 960 show it has ample headroom.
Q: How does the RX 7900 XTX compare to its nearest rival in this game?
A: The RX 7900 XTX has an average benchmark score of 44019, which is 2% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti’s score of 44900. However, in Fivem, the measured results show strong performance, particularly at 1440p.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Ultra settings?
A: The measured average FPS is 145.7, which is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate threshold for most monitors, making it ideal for competitive play.
Q: Does the 24 GB VRAM make a difference in Fivem?
A: The data does not show VRAM capacity as a limiting factor at any setting. The 960.0 GB/s bandwidth is more relevant, as it supports the high frame rates seen at 1440p and 1080p.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional results across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 303.6 FPS, which is the highest measured value in the entire dataset. Medium settings drop to 239 FPS, still far above any refresh rate concern. High settings yield 187.9 FPS, and Ultra settings maintain a very smooth 145.7 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is never stressed, and even the most demanding settings leave significant headroom.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU’s workload. Low settings average 196.6 FPS, Medium drops to 156.7 FPS, and High settles at 123 FPS. Ultra settings produce a 98.9 FPS average, which is still above 60 FPS but below the 144 Hz threshold. At 3840x2160, the picture changes. Low settings average 110.4 FPS, Medium 85.1 FPS, and High 71.4 FPS. Ultra settings fall to 53.8 FPS, which is the only preset where the average dips below 60 FPS, indicating that 4K Ultra is not a viable option for this pairing.
Settings Recommendations
The data suggests that Ultra settings are only worthwhile at 1080p, where the 145.7 FPS average provides a fluid experience without compromising visual fidelity. At 1440p, High settings are the best choice, delivering 123 FPS while still looking excellent. The jump from High to Ultra at 1440p costs 24.1 FPS (from 123 to 98.9), a significant drop for marginal visual gains. For 4K users, Medium settings are the practical maximum, as the 85.1 FPS average is playable, but High and Ultra introduce noticeable stutter risk.
For competitive play, 1080p Low settings are the optimal choice, as the 303.6 FPS average maximizes input responsiveness and eliminates any potential frame pacing issues. The 1440p Low setting at 196.6 FPS is also viable for players who want a higher resolution without sacrificing performance. The measured data shows that the preset choice has a more pronounced effect at 4K than at lower resolutions, with a 51.2% difference between Low and Ultra at 3840x2160, compared to a 47.6% difference at 1920x1080.
How This Combo Ranks
Among the 1792 tested combos in the database, this pairing of the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX ranks 250th in Fivem. This places it in the top 14% of all configurations, which is impressive given that the CPU is a mid-range part and the GPU is a high-end offering. The ranking reflects the GPU’s dominance in this game, as the RX 7900 XTX’s 85th percentile standing among GPUs contributes more to the result than the CPU’s 82nd percentile.
The combination’s rank is likely higher than what the CPU alone would achieve, but the GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM and high bandwidth are well-suited to Fivem’s demanding multiplayer environments. The data shows that this combo outperforms many systems with more expensive CPUs, as the game is not heavily CPU-bound at the tested settings. The 250th rank out of 1792 suggests that users with this pairing should expect top-tier performance, but there is room for improvement if paired with a faster CPU, such as those in the CPU’s nearest rivals list, which score within 0.5% of the i5-13400F.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-13400F
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 110.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 85.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 71.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 53.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 196.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 156.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 123.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 98.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 303.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 239.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 187.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 145.7 |
Fivem with ii5-13400F + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RX 7900 XTX + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-13400F + RX 7900 XTX
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.