Fivem

Fivem presents a unique challenge for hardware analysis, as its performance is heavily influenced by server-side scripts and the number of connected players. The data for the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT combination shows a system that is capable of smooth gameplay, but one where settings and resolution choices have a dramatic impact on the experience. This pairing ranks 1122nd out of 1792 tested combos for this specific game, placing it in the lower half of the database, yet the measured frame rates tell a story of a system that can be tuned for excellent performance.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's ranking of 1122 out of 1792 total combinations indicates that while this isn't a top-tier enthusiast setup for Fivem, it is far from inadequate. The position suggests that many other systems, likely with more powerful GPUs, achieve higher average frame rates. However, the ranking is a single data point. The measured FPS data reveals that the experience is highly dependent on the selected graphics preset. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves a very high 163.8 FPS, which is a strong result. This suggests that the CPU is not a major bottleneck at this resolution, allowing the GPU to push frames quickly. The ranking is likely dragged down by the performance at higher resolutions and settings, where the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and mid-range compute power become limiting factors. The data implies that this combo is a solid mid-range performer, but it won't top any charts for Fivem, especially when aiming for maximum visual fidelity.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data clearly shows that the "Ultra" preset is not a viable option for a consistently smooth experience on this hardware. At 1080p Ultra, the system produces 83.8 FPS, which is playable but leaves little headroom for the unpredictable frame time spikes common in multiplayer games. The situation worsens at higher resolutions, with 1440p Ultra dropping to 55.4 FPS and 4K Ultra falling to a barely playable 31.7 FPS. The "High" preset presents a much better balance. At 1080p High, the system delivers 103.8 FPS, which is a comfortable figure for a competitive multiplayer title. Moving to 1440p High, the system still maintains a respectable 65.7 FPS. For players seeking the highest possible frame rates, the "Low" preset at 1080p yields an exceptional 163.8 FPS, which would be ideal for competitive play where visual fidelity is secondary to response time. The "Medium" preset at 1080p offers a middle ground at 130.2 FPS, which is also a very good option. The recommendation is to prioritize the "High" preset for a quality visual experience, or "Low" for maximum performance, with "Medium" serving as a strong compromise.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K provides clear insight into the system's bottleneck. At "Low" settings, the average FPS drops from 163.8 at 1080p to 108.3 at 1440p, and finally to 60.9 at 4K. This is a significant drop, but the fact that the system can still achieve 60 FPS at 4K Low indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor. The performance decline is less severe when moving from 1440p to 4K compared to 1080p to 1440p, which is typical as the GPU becomes fully saturated. The story is similar at "High" settings, where FPS drops from 103.8 at 1080p to 65.7 at 1440p and then to 41.2 at 4K. The data strongly suggests that the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is the component that governs the frame rate ceiling. The CPU, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, appears capable of feeding the GPU enough data to keep it busy, even at 1080p where the frame rates are highest. This points to a classic GPU-bound scenario for this game, particularly as resolution increases.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete set of measured average frame rates reveals a clear performance hierarchy tied to both resolution and graphical settings. Starting at 1920x1080, the system is very capable. The "Low" preset achieves an average of 163.8 FPS. The "Medium" preset is a significant step down but still very fast at 130.2 FPS. The "High" preset drops to 103.8 FPS, and the "Ultra" preset brings the frame rate down to 83.8 FPS. At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to feel the strain. The "Low" preset still delivers a solid 108.3 FPS, but "Medium" falls to 84.5 FPS. "High" is playable at 65.7 FPS, while "Ultra" dips to 55.4 FPS, which is approaching the lower limit for smooth gameplay. At 3840x2160, the results are more demanding. "Low" settings yield 60.9 FPS, which is just on the edge of playability. "Medium" drops to 48.6 FPS, "High" to 41.2 FPS, and "Ultra" is a slideshow at 31.7 FPS. This data confirms that 1080p is the sweet spot for this combo, offering excellent performance across all presets. 1440p is viable with adjusted settings, while 4K is only suitable for the lowest preset.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Fivem with this CPU and GPU combo?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 (1080p) is the optimal resolution, as it allows for high and stable frame rates across all tested settings, from a maximum of 163.8 FPS on Low to 83.8 FPS on Ultra.

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: It can run at 4K, but only with the "Low" preset, which achieves an average of 60.9 FPS. Higher presets result in frame rates from 48.6 FPS (Medium) down to 31.7 FPS (Ultra), which are not ideal for a multiplayer game.

Q: Which graphics preset provides the best overall experience at 1080p?

A: The "High" preset appears to be the best balance, offering an average of 103.8 FPS. This is a significant improvement over the 83.8 FPS on "Ultra" while still providing a high level of visual quality compared to "Low" or "Medium".

Q: Is this system more limited by the CPU or the GPU in Fivem?

A: The benchmark results indicate the GPU is the limiting factor. The frame rate drops significantly as resolution increases, a classic sign of GPU saturation. The Intel Core i5-13400F appears sufficient to support even the highest frame rates seen at 1080p.

Q: What kind of performance can be expected on a 1440p monitor?

A: At 2560x1440, performance is highly variable. The "Low" preset is very playable at 108.3 FPS, but "Ultra" drops to 55.4 FPS. The "High" preset at 65.7 FPS is the recommended choice for a balanced experience.

Q: How does the CPU's rank compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F has a percentile rank of 82 and an average benchmark score of 25236. This is nearly identical to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-13620H, which has an average score of 25201, a difference of only 0.1%.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its 20 MB of shared L3 cache is a key resource for gaming. In the context of Fivem, which can be heavily dependent on single-thread performance for game logic and server communication, the CPU's strong single-core capabilities are crucial. The benchmark data shows a single-thread score of 3004 in Cinebench R23, which is a solid figure. The multi-threaded performance is also robust, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21279. This combination of strong single and multi-core performance ensures that the CPU is unlikely to be a bottleneck in most scenarios, especially at lower resolutions. The data suggests that the CPU is well-equipped to handle the demands of Fivem, allowing the GPU to be the primary determinant of frame rate. Its performance is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-13620H, with a negligible 0.1% difference in average benchmark score.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is the decisive factor in this combo's Fivem performance. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 2055 MHz and a boost clock of 2635 MHz. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a significant point of concern for a game like Fivem, which often has high-resolution textures and a dense environment. The measured frame rates show a clear cliff as resolution increases, with the GPU struggling to maintain high FPS at 4K. The data indicates that the GPU is the limiting component, as the frame rates scale almost entirely with resolution and settings. Its average benchmark score of 29024 is almost identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, which has a deltaPct of 0. This means that the RX 6650 XT's performance is well-understood, and the Fivem results reflect its position as a capable 1080p and light 1440p card, but not a 4K powerhouse.