Fivem

All tested data for the Fivem benchmark with an Intel Core i5-12400 and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is examined below. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake part, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace RTX 4080 with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory. The pair recorded a combo rank of 300 out of 3707 measured combinations, placing it in the upper tier of all tested hardware pairings.

How This Combo Ranks

The measured rank of this CPU-GPU pair in Fivem is 300 out of 3707 tested combinations. This position means it sits in the top segment of the database, though a few hundred other combinations surpass it. The raw ranking reflects the combined performance of the i5-12400 and the RTX 4080. When examining standalone metrics, the CPU has a benchmark percentile of 72, while the GPU achieves a percentile of 86, indicating that both components are above the majority of other parts in their categories.

Near competitors in the CPU's measured score list include the AMD EPYC 7643 with an average score of 18697 (delta -0.1% relative to the i5-12400) and the Intel Core i7-1355U with a score of 18730 (delta -0.3%). The i5-12400's own average benchmark score is 18683, placing it within a narrow band of those rivals. On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 scores 54247, with the RTX 4080 SUPER at 54209 (delta 0.1%) and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54828 (delta -1.1%). These figures show that while the RTX 4080 is strong, it is not the magnitude of the score that defines the game rank; the composite behavior of both parts matters.

The 300th position out of 3707 is a robust result, but not a top-ten ranking. The data suggest that the pairing delivers a high-octane experience in Fivem, yet a few other configurations can exceed its frame output, possibly with more aggressive CPUs or even higher-tier GPUs (although the RTX 4080 is already near the high end of the tested pool).

Settings Recommendations

Fivem was measured at four quality presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—across three resolutions: 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160. At 1080p the average FPS ranges from 305 on Low to 163 on Ultra. That on Ultra already being 163 indicates the system can handle the most demanding preset with a very high average, making visually intensive scenes smooth. Therefore, at 1080p the Ultra preset is the recommended choice, since it retains 163 FPS average and gives the best quality.

For 2560x1440, the scores are: Low 219, Medium 173, High 138, and Ultra 107. Again, Ultra stays above 100 FPS. The Ultra preset gives a 107 average, which is well above standard '60" thresholds and provides a good balance between detail and speed. For players aiming for a high refresh, the Medium preset still delivers 173 average, but Ultra is preferable for quality without sacrificing that smoothness.

The most nuanced recommendation appears at 3840x2160. The average FPS for 4K are: Low 122, Medium 96, High 77, and Ultra 60. Ultra averages exactly 60 FPS, which is a typical target for 60 Hz displays, but the timing may be tight in demanding scenes. The Medium preset shows a minimum FPS of 82 and a maximum of 110, with an average of 96. This offer a headroom that is more consistent than the Ultra throttle. Given that the medium data includes min and max values (82–110), it ensures a stable experience without diving near 60. So 2100 suggests that Medium is the best choice for 4K if frame consistency is desired, while Ultra can be manually tried but may dip at the threshold. High provides a compromise at 77 average.

Thus, the recommendation: for 1080p and 1440p, use Ultra for the best experience; for 4K, Medium is the optimal preset because it maintains a high-90's average while the min resolution of 203 marked as 82, ensuring no abrupt drops.

Resolution Scaling

From 1080p to 4K, the average FPS drops steeply across all settings. Take the High preset: it goes from 210 at 1080p to 138 at 1440p and then to 77 at 4K. The Medium preset drops from 263 to 173 to 96. Low moves from 305 to 219 to 122, and Ultra goes from 163 to 107 to 60. This an almost uniform halving from 1080p to 4K for each setting, indicating strong resolution sensitivity.

The data point that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K because the frame rate at that resolution is heavily pressure bound. At 1080p, the high average of 305 on the lowest settings suggests the CPU is able to do the game fast enough for the GPU to render at those speeds. As the resolution rises, the workload shifts onto the rendering core, and the performance column aligns with GPU binding. The CPU appears to keep up sufficiently at low resolution, but the GPU's busy becomes the clear bottleneck at 4K, where even Low preset only yields 122 FPS compared with 305 at 1080p.

4K and 1080p FPS data are constastant with that interpretation.

Now the Q&A:

FAQ

Q: What performance rank does this combo achieve in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 300th out of 3707 tested configurations.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p using the Ultra preset?

A: The average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 163.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for the Medium preset at 1440p?

A: The minimum FPS for 2560x1440 Medium is 147, with an average of 173 and a max of 199.

Q: Which 4K preset yields the highest average FPS without qualifying at 60?

A: The Low preset at 4K yields the highest average, at 122 FPS. However, it is less practical; the Medium preset gives 96 average with a minimum of 82.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark percentile compared to all GPUs?

A: The RTX 4080 has a percentile of 86 among all GPUs.

Q: Which resolution requires the GPU to be the primary bottleneck?

A: The data indicates that at 3840x2160, the frame rate drops significantly from lower resolutions, showing that the GPU is the limiting component at that resolution.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 brings considerable hardware to the game. It runs at a base clock of 2205 MHz and boosts to 2505 MHz, with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory running at an effective speed of 22.4 Gbps over a 256-bit bus, giving 716.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory size and bandwidth support high-resolution rendering, as seen in the measured average of 77 FPS at 4K High settings. The GPU also has 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, 112 ROPs, and 76 RT cores, though these are not directly mapped to the FPS results in the data. Its FP32 compute throughput of 48.74 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s further indicate a high general rendering ability.

In terms of measured game performance, the RTX 4080 sustains an average of 305 FPS at 1080p Low, 263 at 1080p Medium, and 210 at 1080p High, showing that the CPU can allow the GPU to run at high speed, but the GPU sends within its own capacity. At 4K, the GPU’s role becomes more dominant: 122 FPS on Low, 96 on Medium, 77 on High, and 60 on Ultra. These numbers demonstrate a 4K Ultra is just at the threshold. It persists that the GPU is the machine’s strongest part and that its performance scale inversely with resolution as expected.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with 18 MB of L3 cache. In synthetic benchmark results, it scores 5890 in the 3DMark multi-thread test and 910 in single-thread. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 15989 and single-core 2257. These numbers indicate a mid-range desktop CPU that can manage a gaming load.

In Fivem, the CPU's capacity is visible at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system produces an average of 305 FPS, which is extraordinarily high and far above typical display refresh rates. This suggests that the CPU-FiedGPU combination is able to feed the frame stream at a fast clip, implying the CPU barely limits at this setting. As resolution increases, the CPU's role fades, and we move from the frame rate drop, which is due to the GPU as noted. In 4K Low, the CPU still provides 122 FPS, meaning the CPU is not the primary constraint when the resolution is higher. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are enough to maintain frame rates up to 305, which is a high-demand scenario.

Thus, the CPU's role is best demonstrated in low-resolution high-FPS scenarios; there, the RTX 4080 can be fully saturated without the CPU holding it back.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete measured FPS table is shown below. The data includes average FPS for each resolution and setting. Some entries do not have minimum or maximum values (they are listed as null). For median, min and max are given.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 1920x1080 | Low | 305 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 263 | 223 | 302 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 210 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 163 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 219 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 173 | 147 | 199 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 138 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 107 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 122 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 96 | 82 | 110 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 77 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 60 | - | - |

These figures constitute the full set of measured frame rates used for the analysis. The average FPS for each combination shows a clear progression from Low to Ultra and from 1080p to 4K, matching the expected behavior of these components. The minimum and maximum values for Medium presets give insight into stability: at 1080p Medium, the frames always between 223 and 302; at 1440p Medium, between 147 and 199; at 4K Medium, between 82 and 110. These ranges are all above the 60 FPS threshold for a decent experience.

Note that the absence of min/max values for the other presets means they are not provided in the dataset, so the analysis relies on the averages. The ranking and all other conclusions are drawn solely from these measured numbers.