Fivem

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile combination delivers its most balanced experience at 1440p with Medium settings, where the 87 FPS average represents a strong middle ground between visual fidelity and responsiveness. At 1080p, the combo becomes heavily CPU-bound, while at 4K, the GPU struggles to maintain playable frame rates at higher presets.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data indicates that Medium settings provide the optimal experience across all three tested resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the combo achieves 133 FPS average with a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 153 FPS, offering a wide performance headroom that keeps frame pacing stable. This is particularly important in a multiplayer title like Fivem, where sudden frame drops can impact gameplay responsiveness. The 4K Medium result of 48 FPS with a 41 FPS minimum and 56 FPS maximum shows that even at the most demanding resolution, Medium settings remain playable, whereas High and Ultra presets at 4K fall below the 40 FPS threshold.

For users prioritizing competitive play, Low settings at 1080p push the average to 168 FPS, which is the highest measured result in the entire dataset. However, the jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs only 35 FPS on average (from 168 to 133 FPS), while providing noticeably better visual quality. At 1440p, Low settings deliver 111 FPS, while Medium drops to 87 FPS — a 24 FPS difference that is still well within smooth gameplay territory. The data suggests that Medium is the sweet spot for this combo, as it maintains frame rates above 60 FPS at both 1080p and 1440p while offering the best balance of graphical detail.

Ultra settings are only recommended for screenshot or single-player scenarios. At 1080p Ultra, the average drops to 82 FPS, which is acceptable, but at 1440p Ultra the average falls to 54 FPS, and at 4K Ultra it plummets to 30 FPS. The scaling penalty from Medium to Ultra is steep: 51 FPS at 1080p (from 133 to 82), 33 FPS at 1440p (from 87 to 54), and 18 FPS at 4K (from 48 to 30). Given that Fivem is a multiplayer-focused title where consistent frame delivery matters more than absolute visual quality, Medium settings at 1440p offer the best combination of image quality and performance headroom.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this hardware in Fivem?

A: The measured data shows that 2560x1440 with Medium settings delivers 87 FPS average, which is above the 60 FPS threshold while providing good visual detail. At 1920x1080 Medium, performance rises to 133 FPS average, but the 1440p Medium result offers a better balance for users with higher-resolution displays.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the combo achieves 61 FPS on Low settings, 48 FPS on Medium, 39 FPS on High, and 30 FPS on Ultra. Only the Low preset maintains playable frame rates, while Medium is borderline at 48 FPS with a 41 FPS minimum.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: The data indicates the CPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 1080p. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and the frame rate scaling from 1080p Low (168 FPS) to 1440p Low (111 FPS) shows a 34% reduction, which is less than what pure GPU-bound scaling would suggest.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 2264 out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the 39th percentile of all tested combos. This indicates it is a mid-pack performer for this specific game.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22729, which is 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, and 1.3% behind the Intel Arc B580. Its percentile ranking among all GPUs is 67.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 outperform the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an average benchmark score of 77740, which is 1.7% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900K's average score of 79097 (the delta is -1.7% from the Intel CPU's perspective). The AMD chip also sits above the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX by 2%.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in this combo. Starting with Low settings, the average FPS drops from 168 at 1080p to 111 at 1440p (a 34% reduction) and then to 61 at 4K (a 45% reduction from 1440p). This pattern indicates that at 1080p Low, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with its 16 cores and 32 threads is the limiting factor, as the frame rate is likely capped by the CPU's ability to process game logic and draw calls. The GPU, with its 3072 shading units and 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, has headroom to render more pixels.

At Medium settings, the scaling shows a more balanced workload. The 1080p average of 133 FPS drops to 87 FPS at 1440p (a 35% reduction) and then to 48 FPS at 4K (a 45% reduction from 1440p). The consistent percentage drops across Medium settings suggest that both CPU and GPU are being utilized more evenly. However, the absolute FPS values at 4K Medium (48 FPS) indicate that the RTX 4060 Mobile's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes a constraint as pixel count increases.

High settings exhibit the steepest scaling curve: 106 FPS at 1080p, 70 FPS at 1440p (a 34% reduction), and 39 FPS at 4K (a 44% reduction from 1440p). The 4K High result of 39 FPS is below the playable threshold, showing that the GPU cannot sustain High settings at 4K. Ultra settings follow a similar pattern: 82 FPS at 1080p, 54 FPS at 1440p (a 34% reduction), and 30 FPS at 4K (a 44% reduction). The uniformity of the percentage drops across all settings suggests that the scaling behavior is consistent, but the absolute performance at 4K is limited by the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute capacity.

The resolution scaling data clearly shows that 4K is only viable with Low or Medium settings, while 1080p and 1440p offer much more flexibility. The 34% drop from 1080p to 1440p at all settings indicates a predictable scaling pattern, while the additional drop to 4K shows the GPU hitting its performance ceiling.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 2264 out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the bottom 39% of all tested configurations. This rank reflects the balance between the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, where the CPU is exceptionally strong but the GPU is mid-range. The CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs is 95, meaning it outperforms 95% of all processors in general benchmark tests. However, the GPU's percentile ranking is 67, which pulls down the overall combo rank for this GPU-intensive game.

In the context of Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification of Grand Theft Auto V, the game tends to be more demanding on CPU resources due to the large number of networked entities and script processing. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 16 cores and 32 threads with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz provide ample processing power for these workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 and single-core score of 2044 indicate strong performance in both multithreaded and single-threaded tasks, which is relevant for Fivem's mixed workload.

The GPU's passmark G3D score of 17469 places it in the 67th percentile among all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (0.7% faster), AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (0.8% slower), and Intel Arc B580 (1.3% faster). This puts the RTX 4060 Mobile in solid mid-range territory, but it is not a high-end part. The combination of a top-tier CPU with a mid-tier GPU results in the 2264th rank, suggesting that users would see better overall performance in Fivem with a more balanced pairing, such as a mid-range CPU with a higher-end GPU.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 plays a critical role in Fivem's performance, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU has spare capacity. The CPU features 16 cores and 32 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, providing substantial memory capacity for game data.

In benchmark tests, the CPU scores 35314 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2044 in single-core, reflecting its strong multithreaded capabilities. The Geekbench scores of 20992 multi-core and 2464 single-core further confirm its high performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 54934 and single-thread score of 4147 show balanced performance across both workloads. This is important for Fivem, which requires both single-thread performance for game logic and multi-threaded performance for handling many simultaneous player connections and script executions.

The data shows that Fivem benefits significantly from the CPU's capabilities at 1080p. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 168 FPS, which is the highest measured result. This suggests that the CPU can drive the game engine fast enough to support high frame rates, and the GPU is not the bottleneck at this resolution. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77740, places it just 1.6% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 1.7% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900K. This demonstrates that the CPU is a high-end part that can handle Fivem's demands without becoming a limiting factor.

However, at higher resolutions, the CPU's advantage diminishes as the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p and 4K is more attributable to GPU limitations than CPU capabilities. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (2044 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that Fivem's primary game thread runs efficiently, while the 32 threads handle background tasks like network synchronization and AI processing. The 64 MB of L3 cache helps reduce memory latency for frequently accessed game data, contributing to smoother frame delivery.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results: Low settings produce 168 FPS average, Medium produces 133 FPS with a minimum of 113 and maximum of 153, High produces 106 FPS, and Ultra produces 82 FPS. These results indicate that 1080p is well within the capability of this hardware, with even Ultra settings maintaining above 80 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance scales down proportionally. Low settings achieve 111 FPS, Medium achieves 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 and maximum of 100, High achieves 70 FPS, and Ultra achieves 54 FPS. The 1440p Medium result of 87 FPS is the best balance of quality and performance, as it stays above 60 FPS while offering improved visual detail over Low settings. The 1440p High result of 70 FPS is also playable, but the drop from Medium to High is 17 FPS, which may be noticeable to users with high refresh rate displays.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. Low settings produce 61 FPS, Medium produces 48 FPS with a minimum of 41 and maximum of 56, High produces 39 FPS, and Ultra produces 30 FPS. Only the Low preset maintains a consistent 60+ FPS average, while Medium dips close to the 40 FPS minimum threshold. High and Ultra at 4K are not suitable for gameplay, as frame rates fall below 40 FPS.

The Medium settings data across all resolutions shows the most complete picture, with minimum and maximum FPS values provided. At 1080p, the 113-153 FPS range indicates a 26% variance, which is acceptable for multiplayer gaming. At 1440p, the 74-100 FPS range shows a 26% variance as well, maintaining consistent performance. At 4K, the 41-56 FPS range has a 27% variance, suggesting that frame pacing remains stable even when the GPU is under heavy load. This consistency is important for Fivem, where unpredictable frame spikes can disrupt gameplay.