Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER produces a distinctive performance profile in Fivem, one that clearly separates the CPU’s capabilities from the GPU’s limitations. The data reveals a configuration that is consistently bound by graphics processing, yet capable of delivering playable frame rates when settings are tuned appropriately.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU and GPU combination in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 1087 out of 1792 tested combinations, placing it in the lower half of the database. This position reflects the RTX 2070 SUPER’s aging architecture, which holds back the modern Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9800X3D compare to its nearest CPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 37780 is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon 6353P (37811, deltaPct -0.1) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (37831, deltaPct -0.1). It trails the Intel Core i9-13900HK and Intel Core i5-13600KF by only 0.6% and 0.7%, respectively, indicating parity at the top end of desktop processors.

Q: What is the RTX 2070 SUPER’s standing against its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score of 22206 is 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA RTX A400 (22307) and 0.9% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (22006). It is 2.3% behind the RTX 4060 Mobile (22729) and 2.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (21670), showing it sits in a tight mid-range cluster.

Q: What is the best 1080p performance this combo can achieve in Fivem?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combination reaches 175.1 FPS average. This is the highest measured frame rate across all tested resolutions and settings, demonstrating that the CPU can push very high frame rates when the GPU workload is minimized.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K with maximum settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 32.1. This is the lowest measured result, confirming that the RTX 2070 SUPER’s 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-resolution, high-fidelity rendering in Fivem.

Q: Is the measured data for this combo considered reliable?

A: Yes, the fact pack explicitly states "dataIsMeasured": true, meaning the FPS figures come from actual benchmark runs rather than estimates or projections. This provides confidence in the performance patterns observed across resolutions and settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the defining constraint in this pairing. The GPU’s Turing architecture, built on a 12 nm process, features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock of 1605 MHz and boost clock of 1770 MHz drive 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The card’s 9.062 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is modest by modern standards, and the benchmark percentile of 65 versus all GPUs places it solidly in the mid-range.

In Fivem, the GPU’s role becomes apparent when examining the frame rate scaling. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo achieves 175.1 FPS, but dropping to 1440p Low reduces this to 114.2 FPS, a 35% decline. The 4K Low result of 64.7 FPS further illustrates that the GPU struggles as pixel count rises. The memory subsystem is particularly stressed at 3840x2160, where even Medium settings yield only 48.7 FPS. The data suggests that the RTX 2070 SUPER’s 8 GB frame buffer is a limiting factor, as Fivem’s open-world multiplayer environments demand substantial texture memory at higher resolutions.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 22206, which places it within 2.5% of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 and 2.3% of the RTX 4060 Mobile, confirms its mid-pack positioning. This is not a card designed for high-refresh 4K gaming, and the Fivem results reinforce that assessment. The RTX 2070 SUPER’s end-of-life production status further suggests that its performance ceiling is fixed, with no driver optimizations likely to dramatically alter these results.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 1087 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the 39th percentile of all configurations, meaning roughly 60% of tested systems perform better. The ranking is unsurprising given the GPU’s age; the CPU is a top-tier part with a 90th percentile standing among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile.

The disparity between the components is stark. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D’s average benchmark score of 37780 is within 0.7% of the Intel Core i9-13900HK and Core i5-13600KF, both of which are strong modern processors. Meanwhile, the RTX 2070 SUPER’s 22206 average score is more than 2000 points below the RTX 4060 Mobile. In Fivem, this imbalance means the combo’s rank is dragged down almost entirely by GPU performance, since the CPU is capable of far higher frame rates than the GPU can deliver.

The rank of 1087 suggests that users with this setup are likely experiencing frame rates limited by the graphics card, particularly at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the combo performs respectably, but the ranking indicates that many other combinations—likely those with newer GPUs—achieve better results in this multiplayer title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers an average of 175.1 FPS on Low, 136.6 FPS on Medium, 108.1 FPS on High, and 88 FPS on Ultra. These figures show a steady progression, with Ultra producing exactly half the frame rate of Low. The 1080p results are the strongest in the dataset, indicating that the CPU can saturate the GPU at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to 114.2 on Low, 91.9 on Medium, 73.5 on High, and 57.3 on Ultra. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is significant: Low drops by 35%, Medium by 33%, High by 32%, and Ultra by 35%. This uniform reduction suggests the GPU is becoming the bottleneck, as the pixel count increases by 78% while frame rates decline by roughly one-third.

At 3840x2160, the results are substantially lower: 64.7 FPS on Low, 48.7 FPS on Medium, 40 FPS on High, and 32.1 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is a 50% reduction, similar to the 1080p spread. However, the absolute numbers are marginal for smooth gameplay, with only the Low preset exceeding 60 FPS. The data indicates that 4K is only viable with the lowest settings, and even then, the frame rate is far from ideal for a multiplayer game.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a formidable processor that excels in gaming workloads. It features 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The processor’s 96 MB of shared L3 cache is a key advantage, providing ample storage for game data. Its 3DMark multi-threaded score of 10081 and single-thread score of 1212 demonstrate strong performance across both lightly and heavily threaded tasks.

In Fivem, the CPU’s role is to maintain high frame rates when the GPU is not the limiting factor. The 1080p Low result of 175.1 FPS shows the CPU’s capability, as this frame rate is well beyond what many GPUs can sustain. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34004 and single-core score of 4800 indicate that it can handle Fivem’s physics and AI calculations without breaking a sweat. However, the data shows that the CPU’s potential is largely untapped in this combo, as the GPU consistently becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions.

The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking versus all CPUs, combined with its 120 W TDP and 4 nm process node, highlights its efficiency. The processor’s memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s via DDR5 dual-channel support ensures that data can flow quickly to the GPU. Yet, in Fivem, the RTX 2070 SUPER’s 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are insufficient to leverage the CPU’s speed fully, resulting in a system that is GPU-bound in almost all scenarios.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data suggests that the optimal experience depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 108.1 FPS, which is smooth for most players. However, the Ultra preset’s 88 FPS is still playable, and the 20 FPS difference between High and Ultra may not justify the visual upgrade for competitive play. For users prioritizing frame rate, the Medium preset at 136.6 FPS offers a strong balance, though Low at 175.1 FPS is best for esports-style responsiveness.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset’s 91.9 FPS is the sweet spot, providing a good balance of visual fidelity and performance. The High preset’s 73.5 FPS is acceptable but starts to show the GPU’s strain, while Ultra’s 57.3 FPS dips below the 60 FPS threshold that many players consider minimum for smooth gameplay. The Low preset’s 114.2 FPS is excellent, but the visual sacrifice may be too steep for some.

At 3840x2160, only the Low preset’s 64.7 FPS is viable for consistent gameplay. The Medium preset’s 48.7 FPS and High’s 40 FPS are marginal, while Ultra’s 32.1 FPS is not recommended. The data strongly suggests that 4K gaming with this combo requires lowering settings to Low, and even then, the experience may not be ideal for a fast-paced multiplayer title. For most users, 1440p with Medium settings offers the best trade-off between image quality and frame rate.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the GPU-bound nature of this configuration. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 175.1 at 1080p to 114.2 at 1440p (a 35% reduction) and then to 64.7 at 4K (a 43% further reduction from 1440p). This scaling pattern is consistent with pixel count increases: 1440p has 1.78 times the pixels of 1080p, and 4K has 2.25 times the pixels of 1440p. The frame rate declines are slightly less than proportional to pixel count, suggesting some overhead is being absorbed by the CPU.

At Ultra settings, the drop is more severe: 88 FPS at 1080p, 57.3 FPS at 1440p, and 32.1 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p reduction is 35%, but the 1440p to 4K reduction is 44%, indicating that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute resources become increasingly taxed at higher resolutions. The RTX 2070 SUPER’s 8 GB VRAM is likely a contributing factor, as Fivem’s detailed environments may exceed this capacity at 4K, causing performance to degrade further.

The scaling data implies that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combo. If the Ryzen 7 9800X3D were the bottleneck, frame rates would remain relatively flat across resolutions, as the CPU’s workload would not increase with pixel count. Instead, the significant drops at each resolution step confirm that the RTX 2070 SUPER is the primary constraint. This is a classic case of a modern CPU being paired with an older GPU, where the GPU’s age prevents the system from reaching its full potential.