Fivem

# FAQ

Q: What is the combination ranking of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 2138th out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the field. This position reflects a pairing that is capable but not exceptional for this multiplayer title, with many other configurations outperforming it.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40081, which is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40048), 0.2% behind the Intel Core 5 221E (40144), 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (40246), and 0.6% behind the Intel Core i9-13905H (40313). The differences are marginal, indicating near-identical overall processing performance among these four chips.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs, and what does that mean?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. This means it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the graphics cards in the database, positioning it as a solid mid-range to upper-mid-range option, though it falls short of top-tier hardware.

Q: What are the measured FPS figures at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the combo delivers an average of 138 FPS, with a minimum of 118 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS. This represents a smooth, highly playable experience for most scenarios in Fivem.

Q: What memory configuration does the GPU use, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Is the CPU's integrated graphics a factor for this gaming setup?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 does include Radeon Graphics as integrated graphics, but the system relies on the discrete RTX 2070 SUPER for rendering. The integrated graphics serve as a fallback or for non-gaming tasks, not for Fivem performance.

# How This Combo Ranks

The data places this AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and RTX 2070 SUPER pairing at rank 2138 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. That percentile position — roughly the 42nd percentile from the top — tells a clear story: this is a middle-of-the-road configuration for this specific multiplayer game. The ranking is not a verdict on raw hardware quality; both components post respectable benchmark scores. Instead, it reflects how this particular pairing behaves under Fivem's workload, which is notoriously variable due to server-side scripting and player density.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 40081 places it in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, a strong showing for a desktop processor. The GPU, however, sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 20282. The gap between these two percentiles is revealing. The processor is clearly the stronger component in this pairing, while the graphics card is the limiting factor for overall system capability. This imbalance likely contributes to the combo's mid-pack ranking in Fivem, as the game's performance is often constrained by the graphics card at higher resolutions and settings.

When compared to the nearest rival combos, the CPU's deltaPct values are all within 0.6% of its closest competitors. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is essentially tied at 0.1% faster, while the Intel Core 5 221E, AMD Ryzen 9 270, and Intel Core i9-13905H are 0.2%, 0.4%, and 0.6% faster respectively. These differences are negligible in real-world gaming terms, meaning the CPU is not the differentiator that pushes this combo higher or lower in the rankings. The GPU, on the other hand, has larger deltas from its nearest rivals — all of which are faster. The Quadro M4000M is 1% faster, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 1.2% faster, the Intel Arc B570 is 1.3% faster, and the Intel Arc A750 is 1.5% faster. This consistent pattern of the GPU being outpaced by its peers suggests the graphics card is what holds this combo back from a higher rank.

# GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory to the table, with a 256-bit bus width and a substantial 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. These specs are directly relevant to Fivem's performance, which can be memory-hungry when rendering dense cityscapes with many players and vehicles. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), and the GPU's base clock is 1605 MHz with a boost clock of 1770 MHz. For a game that often loads large textures and detailed environments, the 8 GB frame buffer is adequate but not generous, and the bandwidth is solid for the card's class.

The GPU's benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 18169 at the 65th percentile, and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1651. These numbers indicate the card can handle modern rendering workloads, but its age — it was released in 2019 and is now end-of-life — means it lacks the newer features and raw throughput of more recent architectures. The 12 nm process node and Turing architecture are reflected in the card's 9.062 TFLOPS of FP32 performancechers, which is modest by today's standards.

In Fivem specifically, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution and settings increase. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 175 FPS average, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 31 FPS. This scaling pattern shows the GPU is the component that limits performance at higher workloads. The card's 64 ROPs and 160 TMUs provide the pixel and texture throughput necessary for the game's visuals, but they are insufficient for maintaining high frame rates at 4K with Ultra settings. The RTX 2070 SUPER also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which Fivem can leverage, but the game's multiplayer nature often means CPU-side server logic and player positions are more critical than raw graphical effects.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture across three resolutions and four settings levels. Starting at 1920x1080, the combo delivers 175 FPS on Low, 138 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 118 and maximum of 159), 111 FPS on High, and 86 FPS on Ultra. These numbers show the combo is well-suited for 1080p gaming, with even Ultra settings maintaining a playable frame rate well above 60 FPS. The Medium preset's min/max range of 118-159 FPS indicates reasonable stability, though the spread suggests some frametime variance in demanding scenes.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops are noticeable but not catastrophic. Low settings yield 116 FPS average, Medium drops to 91 FPS (min 77, max 105), High comes in at 73 FPS, and Ultra falls to 57 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p still provides a smooth experience, but Ultra dips below the 60 FPS threshold, which is a critical point for competitive multiplayer. The min FPS of 77 on Medium shows that even in the most demanding moments, the combo stays above 60 FPS at this resolution with mid-range settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Low settings produce 64 FPS average, Medium drops to 51 FPS (min 43, max 58), High falls to 40 FPS, and Ultra plummets to 31 FPS. The Medium setting's minimum of 43 FPS indicates that even the most conservative preset at 4K will experience noticeable stutter in heavy scenes. The progression from Low to Ultra at 4K — from 64 FPS down to 31 FPS — represents a 51.6% reduction in frame rate, demonstrating the GPU's inability to keep up with higher graphical demands at this resolution.

# Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent across all settings, which reveals a GPU-bound configuration. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 175 at 1080p to 116 at 1440p (a 33.7% drop) and then to 64 at 4K (a 63.4% drop from 1080p). For Medium settings, the progression is 138 to 91 to 51 — representing a 34.1% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 63.0% drop from 1080p to 4K. High settings follow a similar pattern: 111 to 73 to 40, with drops of 34.2% and 64.0% respectively. Ultra settings show the most significant degradation: 86 to 57 to 31, with drops of 33.7% and 64.0%.

The consistency of these percentage drops — all hovering around 33-34% from 1080p to 1440p and 63-64% from 1080p to 4K — is a strong indicator that the GPU is the limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see smaller differences between resolutions, as the CPU workload would remain constant while the GPU handles more pixels. The fact that frame rates scale predictably with pixel count suggests the RTX 2070 SUPER is saturated at 4K, while the Ryzen 7 7700 has spare capacity.

This scaling behavior also explains the combo's mid-pack ranking. At 1080p, the pairing is capable of high frame rates, but at 1440p and especially 4K, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth become insufficient. The 4K Medium results of 51 FPS average and 43 FPS minimum are particularly telling — they show that the GPU struggles to maintain even 60 FPS at this resolution, regardless of settings. For players targeting 4K, the RTX 2070 SUPER is the clear bottleneck, and the data suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield more significant gains than any CPU change.

# CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is a desktop processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with a 5 nm process. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its benchmark scores: 18760 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1930 in single-core, plus 34470 in PassMark multi-thread.

For Fivem, the CPU's role is significant due to the game's multiplayer nature. Fivem servers run complex scripts that handle player positions, vehicle physics, and world state, all of which place a load on the CPU. The Ryzen 7 7700's 16 threads and high boost clock are well-suited for this workload, as the game can distribute server-related tasks across multiple cores while maintaining high single-thread performance for the main game loop. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 405084 and integer math score of 110295 indicate strong processing power for these types of calculations.

However, the data shows that the CPU is not the bottleneck in this pairing. The measured FPS scaling with resolution — where performance drops consistently as resolution increases — indicates GPU limitation. The CPU's percentile ranking of 87th among all CPUs, compared to the GPU's 65th percentile, reinforces this interpretation. In Fivem, the CPU is likely capable of delivering even higher frame rates than the GPU allows, particularly at lower resolutions. The 1080p Low result of 175 FPS suggests the CPU can handle high-frame-rate scenarios, but the GPU's limits become apparent as graphical load increases.

The CPU's memory support for DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth also contributes to overall system performance. While the RTX 2070 SUPER uses GDDR6 memory, the CPU's DDR5 support ensures fast communication with system memory, which can be beneficial for Fivem's data-heavy multiplayer environments. The PCIe Gen 5 interface (with 24 lanes) provides ample bandwidth for the GPU, though the RTX 2070 SUPER uses PCIe 3.0 x16, so the CPU's newer interface is not fully utilized.

# Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimal settings based on resolution and desired performance. At 1920x1080, all settings deliver playable frame rates, but the best balance of visual quality and performance is the High preset at 111 FPS average. Ultra at 86 FPS is also viable, but the 22.5% drop from High to Ultra may not justify the visual gains in a fast-paced multiplayer game. For players who prioritize maximum smoothness, Medium at 138 FPS is an excellent choice, offering a significant boost over High while still maintaining decent visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts to Medium settings, which deliver 91 FPS average with a minimum of 77 FPS. This preset provides smooth gameplay while maintaining the visual benefits of 1440p resolution. High at 73 FPS is playable but closer to the edge, and Ultra at 57 FPS dips below 60 FPS, which can cause noticeable stutter in competitive scenarios. Low at 116 FPS is an option for players who want maximum frame rates, but the graphical sacrifices may be too severe for a game that relies on visual cues for situational awareness.

At 3840x2160, the data suggests that 4K gaming is only viable with Low settings, which deliver 64 FPS average. Medium at 51 FPS and High at 40 FPS are below the 60 FPS threshold, and Ultra at 31 FPS is not recommended for any competitive play. Players with 4K displays should consider lowering the resolution or accepting the visual compromises of Low settings. The Medium preset's minimum of 43 FPS indicates that even this setting will experience significant frame rate dips in busy scenes, making it a poor choice for consistent performance.

The best overall experience, based on the measured rows, is 1080p with Medium settings, offering 138 FPS average with a 118-159 FPS range. This combination provides high frame rates, smooth minimums, and enough visual fidelity for Fivem's multiplayer environments. For 1440p users, Medium is the sweet spot, while 4K users should stick to Low or consider a GPU upgrade to improve their experience.