Fivem

Fivem is a demanding multiplayer title that scales significantly with both CPU and GPU resources, and the combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 produces a high-performance experience, though the data reveals a clear hierarchy in how resolution and settings impact frame rates. The measured results show this pairing ranks 357th out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the top percentile of systems for this game. The following analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, system component roles, and performance characteristics based exclusively on the provided benchmark results.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial, indicating a shift in the bottleneck from the CPU to the GPU as pixel count increases. At 1080p High settings, the system produces 210 FPS, but at 4K High, it drops to 77 FPS, representing a 63% reduction in frame rate. This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions, where the RTX 4080's rendering workload becomes the limiting factor.

Examining the Medium settings preset across resolutions reveals the scaling pattern more clearly. At 1920x1080 Medium, the average FPS is 240, which drops to 173 at 2560x1440 Medium (a 28% decrease), and further to 96 at 3840x2160 Medium (a 60% decrease from 1080p). The incremental drop from 1440p to 4K is larger than the drop from 1080p to 1440p, which suggests that the GPU is being progressively saturated as the pixel count approaches 4K.

The Low settings preset shows the most extreme scaling behavior. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 261 FPS, which is the highest measured average in the entire dataset. At 1440p Low, it drops to 219 FPS, and at 4K Low, it falls to 122 FPS. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 16%, which is relatively modest, but the 1440p to 4K drop is 44%, indicating that even at Low settings, the 4K resolution imposes a heavy load on the RTX 4080.

The scaling data suggests that at 1080p, the Ryzen 7 5700X3D's performance is sufficient to feed the RTX 4080, as frame rates remain very high across all settings. However, as resolution increases to 4K, the GPU's raw throughput becomes the dominant constraint, and the frame rate differences between settings narrow. For instance, at 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 98 FPS (261 vs 163), while at 4K, the same comparison shows a difference of only 62 FPS (122 vs 60).

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 261, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. The next highest is 240 FPS at 1080p Medium, followed by 219 FPS at 1440p Low.

Q: How does the 4K Ultra preset compare to the 1080p Ultra preset?

A: At 4K Ultra, the system produces an average of 60 FPS, which is exactly half of the 1080p Ultra result of 163 FPS. This 103 FPS difference highlights the massive performance cost of rendering at 4K with maximum quality settings.

Q: Is there a measurable minimum FPS value in the dataset?

A: Yes, the dataset includes min FPS values for the Medium settings preset only. At 1920x1080 Medium, the minimum FPS is 204; at 2560x1440 Medium, it is 147; and at 3840x2160 Medium, it is 82. No min FPS values are provided for the Low, High, or Ultra presets.

Q: What is the FPS difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset produces 138 FPS, while the Ultra preset produces 107 FPS. This represents a 31 FPS difference, or a 22% reduction in performance when moving from High to Ultra at this resolution.

Q: Which resolution and settings combination yields the lowest average FPS?

A: The lowest measured average FPS is 60, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. This is the only configuration in the dataset that falls below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the 1080p Medium preset's max FPS compare to its min FPS?

A: At 1920x1080 Medium, the max FPS is 276, and the min FPS is 204, resulting in a 72 FPS range. This wide variance suggests that the frame rate fluctuates significantly during gameplay, even at this relatively modest resolution.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the primary driver of frame rates at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the significant FPS drops when moving from 1440p to 4K. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is likely sufficient for the game's assets at all tested settings, as the data does not show any abnormal frame rate collapses that would indicate VRAM capacity being exceeded.

The GPU's clock speeds are notable: a base clock of 2205 MHz and a boost clock of 2505 MHz. The boost clock is critical for sustained performance, and the data suggests that the RTX 4080 maintains high utilization across all resolutions. The GPU's architecture is Ada Lovelace on a 5 nm process from TSMC, featuring 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s, which are directly relevant to the rendering workload in Fivem.

The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce its high-end positioning. The Passmark G3D score is 34457, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6567. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 214739, and the Vulkan score is 263779. The GPU's percentile vs all GPUs is 86, meaning it outperforms 86% of tested GPUs. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, has a deltaPct of 0.1%, indicating nearly identical performance. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% slower.

The GPU's TDP is 320 W, with a suggested PSU of 700 W, and it uses a 16-pin power connector. The card is triple-slot and measures 310 mm in length. These physical characteristics are consistent with a high-end GPU that generates significant heat. The GPU's production status is listed as end-of-life, with a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of which preset offers the best experience at each resolution. For 4K gaming, the High preset at 77 FPS is the only viable option for smooth gameplay, as the Ultra preset drops to 60 FPS and the Medium preset falls to 96 FPS but with a lower visual quality. The Low preset at 122 FPS is playable but sacrifices significant visual fidelity. The data suggests that 4K High is the sweet spot for this combo.

At 1440p, the High preset delivers 138 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 173 FPS offers even higher frame rates, but the visual difference between Medium and High is likely noticeable. The Ultra preset at 107 FPS is also playable but represents a 22% performance drop from High. For most users, 1440p High appears to be the balanced choice, offering a strong frame rate without compromising visual quality.

At 1080p, the system is clearly CPU-bound, as even the Ultra preset produces 163 FPS. The Medium preset at 240 FPS and the Low preset at 261 FPS are extremely high, but the High preset at 210 FPS is the recommended option for users who want a mix of visual quality and performance. The Ultra preset at 163 FPS is still very playable and provides the best visual experience, but the 47 FPS difference between Ultra and High may not justify the visual upgrade for competitive players.

The Medium preset deserves special attention because it is the only preset with min/max FPS data. At 1080p Medium, the min FPS is 204, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 1440p Medium, the min FPS is 147, and at 4K Medium, the min FPS is 82. This data suggests that the Medium preset provides a consistent frame rate experience with only moderate dips. For users who prioritize frame time consistency, the Medium preset is the safest choice across all resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates exceptional performance across all settings. The Low preset produces 261 FPS, the Medium preset produces 240 FPS with a min of 204 and max of 276, the High preset produces 210 FPS, and the Ultra preset produces 163 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline, with the largest single-step drop being 47 FPS between High and Ultra. The 1080p results clearly indicate that the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset exceeds 160 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a more pronounced drop-off. The Low preset produces 219 FPS, the Medium preset produces 173 FPS with a min of 147 and max of 199, the High preset produces 138 FPS, and the Ultra preset produces 107 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 112 FPS, which is a substantial gap. The 1440p results show that the GPU is beginning to take on a more significant role, but the CPU still provides enough headroom for very high frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the system's performance is heavily constrained by the GPU. The Low preset produces 122 FPS, the Medium preset produces 96 FPS with a min of 82 and max of 110, the High preset produces 77 FPS, and the Ultra preset produces 60 FPS. The drop from 1440p to 4K is significant at every setting level. For example, at High settings, the frame rate drops from 138 to 77, a 44% reduction. At Ultra settings, the frame rate drops from 107 to 60, a 44% reduction as well. The consistency of this 44% drop across settings underscores the GPU-bound nature of 4K rendering.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D plays a critical role in sustaining high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, where the GPU is not fully saturated. The CPU features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The architecture is Zen 3 on a 7 nm process from TSMC, with a codename of Vermeer. The CPU has a 96 MB shared L3 cache, which is a key feature for gaming performance, as it reduces memory latency and improves data access efficiency.

The CPU's benchmark scores confirm its gaming-oriented design. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 22366, and the single-core score is 3157. The Geekbench multicore score is 11086, and the single-core score is 1849. The Passmark multithread score is 26318, and the single-thread score is 2970. The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 77, indicating it outperforms 77% of tested CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D, has a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the 5700X3D is essentially tied with it. The Intel Core i5-12450HX is 0.5% faster, and the Intel Core i5-11600 is 0.6% faster.

The CPU's memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, offering 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The socket is AMD Socket AM4, and the CPU has a TDP of 105 W. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The CPU's launch MSRP is $249, and its production status is active with a release date of 2024-01-07.

The data indicates that at 1080p, the CPU can deliver frame rates up to 261 FPS at Low settings, which is a very high number. However, the CPU's performance ceiling is not directly measured in the FPS data; rather, the fact that 1080p frame rates are significantly higher than 4K frame rates suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to reach these high numbers. The CPU's 3DMark scores show strong scaling from 2 threads (1575) to 16 threads (6764), indicating good multi-threading capabilities for a game that may utilize multiple cores.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 7 5700X3D and RTX 4080 ranks 357th out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 9.6% of all configurations. This rank is a strong indicator of the system's overall capability in this specific game. The rank is based on measured FPS data across the resolutions and settings detailed above.

Comparing the CPU and GPU individually to their nearest rivals provides context for the combo's performance. The CPU's average benchmark score is 24709, which is nearly identical to the Ryzen 5 7600X3D's score of 24728 (-0.1% delta). The GPU's average benchmark score is 54247, which is essentially tied with the RTX 4080 SUPER's score of 54209 (0.1% delta). This suggests that the combo is performing at the expected level for its components, with no significant bottleneck or inefficiency.

The combo rank of 357 out of 3707 means that there are 356 combos that perform better in Fivem. These higher-ranked combos likely feature faster CPUs (such as newer Ryzen 7000-series or Intel 13th/14th-gen) or faster GPUs (such as the RTX 4090), but the data does not specify which combos are ranked above this one. The fact that this combo is in the top 10% of all tested configurations indicates that it is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and capable of 4K gaming at playable frame rates.

The data also shows that the combo's performance is consistent with its component-level benchmarks. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and the CPU's 77th percentile ranking suggest that both components are above average, and their combination in Fivem yields a system that is competitive with the best available hardware. The measured FPS data confirms that this combo can achieve 60 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is a common target for high-end gaming, and can exceed 200 FPS at 1080p Medium, which is ideal for competitive play.