Fivem

Fivem, in its multiplayer form, presents a demanding workload that scales heavily with resolution. The measured data for the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination shows a clear progression: at 1920x1080, the average frame rate sits comfortably above 100 FPS across most presets, while at 3840x2160, performance drops below the 60 FPS threshold for all but the Low preset. This indicates that while the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions, the RTX 2070 SUPER becomes the primary limiting factor as pixel count increases, particularly with higher graphical settings.

Resolution Scaling

The performance trajectory from 1080p to 4K is steep and reveals the bottleneck shift. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 175 FPS, which drops to 116 FPS at 2560x1440 and then to 64 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 63.4% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K. The pattern is consistent across all presets: High settings yield 111 FPS at 1080p, 73 FPS at 1440p, and 40 FPS at 4K, a 64% drop. Medium settings show 138 FPS at 1080p, 91 FPS at 1440p, and 51 FPS at 4K, a 63% reduction. Ultra settings are the most demanding, with 86 FPS at 1080p dropping to 57 FPS at 1440p and finally to 31 FPS at 4K, a 64% decline.

The consistency of this ~63-64% scaling factor across all presets is telling. It suggests that the GPU is the dominant constraint at 4K, regardless of the visual fidelity selected. The RTX 2070 SUPER, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, simply cannot maintain the same throughput when the pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K. The data indicates that 1440p is the practical ceiling for this combo if aiming for smooth gameplay, with High settings delivering 73 FPS and Ultra still achieving a playable 57 FPS. At 4K, only the Low preset (64 FPS) manages to stay above the 60 FPS mark, while Medium (51 FPS) and High (40 FPS) fall noticeably behind, and Ultra (31 FPS) becomes a slideshow.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the pivotal component in this pairing. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is adequate for 1080p and 1440p in Fivem, but the 4K results suggest that memory capacity and bandwidth are stretched thin. The GPU’s benchmark scores place it in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 20282. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc A750, which scores 20582 (a 1.5% difference), and the Intel Arc B570 at 20556 (1.3% difference). This positioning indicates that the RTX 2070 SUPER is a solid mid-range performer, but it is not built for 4K gaming at high fidelity in a multiplayer environment like Fivem.

The GPU’s clock speeds are listed as a base of 1605 MHz and a boost of 1770 MHz. These clocks, combined with the Turing architecture’s 2560 shading units and 160 texture mapping units, allow for strong 1080p performance. However, the 9.062 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The measured FPS data supports this: the gap between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p is 89 FPS (175 vs 86), but at 4K, the gap narrows to 33 FPS (64 vs 31). This narrowing indicates that at 4K, the GPU is so saturated that even reducing settings yields diminishing returns, as the raw fill rate and pixel throughput become the bottleneck. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is also a factor, as 4K resolution requires significantly more data to be moved per frame.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 is the optimal resolution. At 1440p, even the Ultra preset maintains an average of 57 FPS, while High settings deliver 73 FPS. This provides a balance between visual fidelity and smoothness that 4K cannot offer.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: Only at the Low preset, which averages 64 FPS. Medium settings drop to 51 FPS, High to 40 FPS, and Ultra to 31 FPS. The 4K results indicate the RTX 2070 SUPER is not sufficient for high-fidelity 4K play in this title.

Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER compare to its closest rivals?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20282. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, which is 1.5% higher, and the Intel Arc B570 scores 20556, 1.3% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 1% higher, while the RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, 1.2% higher.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests not. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system reaches 175 FPS, and with Ultra settings, it still hits 86 FPS. These high frame rates indicate the Ryzen 5 7400F is capable of keeping up with the GPU at this resolution.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 116 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 57 FPS. This is a 59 FPS difference, showing a significant performance cost for maxing out settings.

Q: Does the 8 GB VRAM cause issues at 4K?

A: The measured data shows a steep performance cliff at 4K, with even Medium settings dropping to 51 FPS. While VRAM capacity is not directly measured, the 8 GB allocation and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth likely contribute to the inability to maintain high frame rates at this resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system performs admirably. The Low preset yields an average of 175 FPS, Medium averages 138 FPS with a minimum of 118 and maximum of 159, High averages 111 FPS, and Ultra averages 86 FPS. These numbers indicate that 1080p is well within the capabilities of this hardware, with even the most demanding preset providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance drops but remains playable. The Low preset averages 116 FPS, Medium averages 91 FPS with a minimum of 77 and maximum of 105, High averages 73 FPS, and Ultra averages 57 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 77 FPS confirms that this resolution is viable for competitive play, while Ultra’s 57 FPS average is borderline for those who prioritize visual quality over absolute smoothness.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. The Low preset averages 64 FPS, which is the only preset to break 60 FPS. Medium averages 51 FPS with a minimum of 43 and maximum of 58, High averages 40 FPS, and Ultra averages 31 FPS. The Medium preset’s maximum of 58 FPS indicates that even the best-case scenario at 4K falls short of a stable 60 FPS experience. The data clearly shows that 4K is not a viable resolution for this GPU in Fivem, unless the user is willing to accept Low settings and occasional dips.

The 1080p Medium preset shows a minimum of 118 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS, suggesting a stable experience with minimal frame time variance. The 1440p Medium preset shows a wider range, from 77 to 105 FPS, which is still acceptable but indicates more fluctuation under load. The 4K Medium preset’s range of 43 to 58 FPS highlights the GPU’s struggle at this resolution, with frame times likely being inconsistent.

Settings Recommendations

For a balanced experience, the 2560x1440 resolution with High settings is the clear recommendation. This combination delivers an average of 73 FPS, which is smooth for most gameplay scenarios, while the High preset provides a good balance of visual quality. Users who prioritize higher frame rates should consider 1440p Low (116 FPS) or 1080p High (111 FPS). For those with 1080p monitors, the Ultra preset at 86 FPS offers the best visual fidelity without sacrificing playability.

At 4K, the data suggests that only the Low preset (64 FPS) is viable for a playable experience. Medium settings at 4K (51 FPS) may be acceptable for less demanding scenarios, but the 43 FPS minimum suggests it will stutter in busy multiplayer areas. The Ultra preset at 31 FPS is not recommended for any gameplay, as it falls well below the threshold for responsive interaction. The 1080p Medium preset (138 FPS) is an excellent choice for competitive players who want a high refresh rate experience, as its minimum of 118 FPS ensures minimal dips.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F plays a supporting role in this configuration, and the data suggests it is more than adequate for Fivem. This 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Its Zen 4 architecture on the 5 nm process node provides strong single-thread performance, which is critical for multiplayer games that often have a primary game thread. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 and multi-core score of 21765 indicate robust performance, and its PassMark single-thread score of 3689 places it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs.

The CPU’s nearest rivals show its competitive positioning. It scores 32750 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707) and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697). It also edges out the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662) by 0.3%, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, a 0.2% difference. These tight margins indicate that the Ryzen 5 7400F is a solid mid-range CPU that does not bottleneck the RTX 2070 SUPER at 1080p or 1440p.

The measured FPS data supports this conclusion. At 1080p Low, the system hits 175 FPS, which is a clear sign that the CPU can feed frames rapidly. Even at 1080p Ultra (86 FPS), the CPU is not the limiting factor, as the GPU is working harder to render the higher settings. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a consistent drop that correlates with GPU load, not CPU load. The Ryzen 5 7400F’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (83.2 GB/s bandwidth) provide ample headroom for the data demands of a multiplayer environment with many entities. The CPU’s performance percentile of 83 and average benchmark score of 32750 confirm that it is a capable partner for the RTX 2070 SUPER, ensuring that the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rate in Fivem across all tested resolutions.