Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER combination delivers a playable experience in Fivem, but the data reveals a system where the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The measured frame rates show a clear pattern of diminishing returns as resolution increases, with the gap between Low and Ultra settings widening significantly. This analysis walks through the benchmark results step by step, examining how the CPU and GPU each contribute to the final output.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data shows a steep decline as resolution moves from 1920x1080 up to 3840x2160. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 159 FPS on average. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings drops that to 105 FPS, a reduction of 54 FPS. At 3840x2160 Low, the average falls further to 58 FPS. This scaling pattern indicates that the RTX 2060 SUPER is the limiting component; the CPU has enough headroom to feed frames at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s rendering throughput cannot keep pace as pixel count increases.

The High preset tells a similar story. At 1920x1080 High, the average is 101 FPS. This drops to 66 FPS at 2560x1440 and then to 37 FPS at 3840x2160. The percentage loss from 1080p to 4K is substantial, with the 4K result being roughly 63% lower than the 1080p figure. This steep drop is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth of the 2060 SUPER become bottlenecks. The card’s 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 105.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are simply insufficient for the demands of 4K rendering in Fivem.

The Medium preset shows the most complete data, including minimum and maximum frame times. At 1920x1080 Medium, the average is 126 FPS with a minimum of 107 and maximum of 145. At 2560x1440 Medium, the average drops to 83 FPS with a range of 70 to 95. At 3840x2160 Medium, the average is 46 FPS with a minimum of 39 and maximum of 53. The minimum frame values are particularly telling; at 4K, the 39 FPS minimum indicates that even the low end of performance is below the 60 FPS threshold commonly associated with smooth gameplay.

Ultra settings are the most demanding. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the combo still manages 78 FPS on average. This falls to 51 FPS at 2560x1440 and becomes nearly unplayable at 28 FPS in 3840x2160. The 4K Ultra result is a clear outlier, suggesting that this resolution and preset combination is not viable for this hardware. The scaling from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra represents a 64% drop, confirming that the GPU is saturated at the higher resolution.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal balance of visual quality and performance depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable. The Low preset achieves 159 FPS, which is well beyond what most displays can show. Medium at 126 FPS offers a significant improvement in visual fidelity while still maintaining a high refresh rate. High at 101 FPS is also excellent, and even Ultra at 78 FPS remains smooth for most users. For 1080p, High is the recommended preset because it provides a strong visual upgrade over Medium while keeping the average above 100 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the options narrow. Low hits 105 FPS, Medium reaches 83 FPS, and High drops to 66 FPS. Ultra falls below 60 FPS at 51 FPS average. The best experience here is Medium, which offers a reasonable balance with an 83 FPS average and minimum frame rate of 70. High is also acceptable for those who prioritize visual quality over the extra smoothness, but the 66 FPS average leaves less headroom for demanding scenes in a multiplayer environment. The data suggests that Medium is the sweet spot for 1440p on this hardware.

At 3840x2160, the situation is more constrained. Low averages 58 FPS, which is playable but requires significant visual compromises. Medium averages 46 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target but potentially acceptable for slower-paced gameplay. High at 37 FPS and Ultra at 28 FPS are not recommended for a smooth experience. For 4K, Low is the only preset that consistently approaches playable frame rates, and even then, the minimum frame data is missing, making it unclear if there are dips below 50 FPS.

The measured data indicates that the RTX 2060 SUPER lacks the raw compute power for high-fidelity 4K gaming in Fivem. The GPU’s 7.181 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory are adequate for 1080p and 1440p but fall short at 4K with higher presets. Users targeting 4K should stick to Low settings, while those with 1080p or 1440p displays can comfortably use Medium or High.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Raphael codename with a 5 nm process. It has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The cache configuration is notable, with a large 96 MB shared L3 cache, which is a hallmark of the X3D line. This CPU scores 3494 in PassMark single-thread tests and 25047 in multithread tests, placing it in the 89th percentile among all CPUs.

In Fivem, the CPU’s role is primarily to maintain a stable frame delivery to the GPU. The benchmark results show that at 1080p Low, the combo reaches 159 FPS, which is a strong indicator that the CPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution. The single-thread score of 3494 is competitive, and the boost clock of 4.50 GHz helps with the game’s primary thread. The large L3 cache is particularly beneficial for a multiplayer title like Fivem, which often involves complex scripting and asset streaming that can benefit from fast cache access.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in the PassMark database include the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H with an average score of 44466, showing a delta of 0.2%, and the Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44342, a 0.5% delta. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309 with a 0.6% delta, while the Intel Core i5-14600 scores 44889 with a -0.7% delta. These comparisons show that the 7500X3D’s overall benchmark average of 44573 is in line with these mobile and desktop parts, suggesting that its CPU performance is well-balanced.

The data from the measured FPS shows that the CPU can support frame rates well above 100 at 1080p. Even at 2560x1440 Low, the combo hits 105 FPS, which still suggests CPU headroom. The bottleneck only becomes apparent at 4K, where the GPU’s limitations dominate. This indicates that for Fivem, the 7500X3D is more than sufficient, and users upgrading from a weaker CPU would likely see improvements in minimum frame rates during heavy multiplayer scenarios, even if the average FPS is GPU-limited.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER combination ranks 2078 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the lower-middle tier of the database, which is consistent with the GPU being an older, end-of-life product. The RTX 2060 SUPER was released in 2019 and has since been succeeded by the GeForce 30 series. Its percentile ranking among all GPUs is 62, meaning it outperforms 62% of the tested GPUs, but its average benchmark score of 18093 is modest by current standards.

The combo’s rank of 2078 out of 3005 indicates that a significant portion of tested configurations outperform it. This is expected given the GPU’s age and the fact that Fivem can be demanding on the graphics card. However, the rank also shows that a portion of combos perform worse, and the 7500X3D’s strong CPU performance helps boost the overall result. In the nearestRivals data for the CPU, the 7500X3D’s average score of 44573 is close to the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44466, with a delta of 0.2%, showing that the CPU is not the weak link in this pairing.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile with an average score of 18159, a delta of -0.4%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 at 18189, a delta of -0.5%. The AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373 with a -1.5% delta, and the Intel Arc A770M scores 18383 with a -1.6% delta. These comparisons show that the RTX 2060 SUPER’s average score of 18093 is slightly below these rivals, but the differences are small, within 1.6% in all cases.

The rank of 2078 out of 3005 is a practical indicator that this combo is best suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming. The measured FPS data supports this, as the combo achieves playable frame rates at those resolutions with Medium or High settings. At 4K, the combo falls short, which is reflected in its overall rank. Users with this hardware should target 1080p for the best experience, or 1440p with moderate settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is based on the TU106 chip with a Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It features 2176 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The card has 34 ray tracing cores and 272 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate. Its base clock is 1470 MHz and boost clock is 1650 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz effectively 14 Gbps. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

In Fivem, the GPU’s performance is the decisive factor in the measured results. The benchmark data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 159 FPS, but at 4K Low, it drops to 58 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is heavily taxed at higher resolutions. The card’s FP32 performance of 7.181 TFLOPS is modest for 4K gaming, and the texture rate of 224.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 105.6 GPixel/s are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K with demanding presets.

The 8 GB memory capacity is another limiting factor. At 4K, textures and geometry can exceed 8 GB, causing the GPU to fall back on slower memory management. The measured FPS at 4K High is 37 FPS, and at 4K Ultra is 28 FPS, both of which are well below playable thresholds. The minimum frame data for Medium at 4K shows 39 FPS, indicating that even the best-case scenario falls short of 60 FPS.

The GPU’s nearest rivals include the RTX 3060 Mobile with a delta of -0.4%, meaning the 2060 SUPER scores slightly lower. The Radeon Pro 5700 and RX 460 also score slightly higher, with deltas of -0.5% and -1.5% respectively. These small differences suggest that the 2060 SUPER is competitive with these parts, but none of them are high-end by modern standards. The Intel Arc A770M scores -1.6% higher, indicating that even integrated-class mobile parts can match the 2060 SUPER in synthetic tests.

For Fivem, the GPU’s role is clear: it provides a playable experience at 1080p and 1440p, but it cannot handle 4K with high settings. The measured data shows that Low settings at 4K are the only viable option, with 58 FPS average. Users should consider lowering resolution or settings to get smoother gameplay, as the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this combination.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings?

A: The average FPS is 101 at 1920x1080 with High settings, making it a smooth experience for most displays.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: At 4K with Low settings, the average FPS is 58, which is playable but requires visual compromises. High and Ultra settings drop to 37 and 28 FPS respectively, which are not recommended.

Q: What is the best preset for 2560x1440?

A: Medium settings offer the best balance, with an average of 83 FPS and a minimum of 70 FPS. High settings average 66 FPS, while Ultra drops to 51 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has an average benchmark score of 44573, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i9-13950HX. It is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and 0.7% lower than the Intel Core i5-14600.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER has 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, provided by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the combo's rank in the database for Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 2078 out of 3005 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle tier. This is primarily due to the GPU’s limitations at higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact measured FPS values for each resolution and settings combination.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | Low | 58 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 46 | 39 | 53 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 37 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 105 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 83 | 70 | 95 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 66 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 51 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 159 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 126 | 107 | 145 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 101 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 78 | - | - |

The data shows a consistent pattern: each step up in settings reduces the average FPS by roughly 20-30% at a given resolution. At 1080p, the spread from Low to Ultra is 81 FPS, from 159 to 78. At 1440p, the spread is 54 FPS, from 105 to 51. At 4K, the spread narrows to 30 FPS, from 58 to 28, indicating that the GPU is so saturated that settings have less relative impact. The Medium preset at each resolution includes the only complete min/max data, showing that the variance is roughly 25-30% between the minimum and maximum frame times. This suggests that while the average FPS is playable at 1080p Medium, there are occasional dips that could be noticeable in fast-paced multiplayer scenarios. Overall, the measured breakdown confirms that this combo is best utilized at 1080p or 1440p with Medium or High settings, and that 4K should be reserved for Low settings or avoided entirely.