Fivem

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT combo in Fivem shows a clear progression as resolution increases, but the shape of that curve is telling. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo delivers 191 FPS average. Moving to 2560x1440 Low drops that to 126 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Low it falls further to 70 FPS. That's a 63.5% reduction from 1080p Low to 4K Low, which is a substantial hit and indicates that even at the lowest settings, the GPU is increasingly the limiting factor as pixel count grows.

The scaling pattern under High settings is similar but slightly gentler in percentage terms. At 1080p High, the combo hits 120 FPS. At 1440p High, it's 79 FPS, and at 4K High it's 44 FPS. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K at High is 63.3%, nearly identical to the Low setting drop. This consistency suggests that the game's engine scales resolution demands in a fairly linear fashion for this particular combo, regardless of the preset. The fact that the percentage drop is similar across Low and High implies that neither the CPU nor the GPU is radically changing its behavior as you move up in resolution — the workload is growing at a steady rate for both.

However, the absolute FPS numbers reveal where the bottleneck truly sits. At 1080p Low, the combo produces 191 FPS, which is far beyond what a 60Hz or even 144Hz display needs. But at 4K Ultra, the average FPS collapses to 34 FPS, and even at 4K Medium it's only 55 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K — 70 FPS versus 34 FPS — is a massive 51.4% reduction just from changing the preset. This shows that while the GPU is the primary constraint at 4K, the CPU has enough headroom to allow the GPU to be fully utilized; otherwise, the drop from Low to Ultra would be smaller if the CPU were holding things back.

The data also shows the min and max FPS for Medium settings across all three resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the min FPS is 128 and max is 173, yielding an average of 151 FPS. At 1440p Medium, min drops to 84 and max to 114, average 99 FPS. At 4K Medium, min is 47 and max is 63, average 55 FPS. The min-to-max spread is relatively narrow at each resolution (a 45 FPS range at 1080p, 30 FPS at 1440p, and 16 FPS at 4K), which implies that the frame pacing is consistent and there aren't severe stutters. But the narrowing range as resolution increases also suggests that the GPU is becoming the binding constraint, as the CPU would cause a wider spread if it were the bottleneck.

What does this mean for the limiting component? At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is likely the limiting factor at Low settings, since the GPU can easily produce 191 FPS and 126 FPS respectively. But at 4K, the GPU's workload increases enough that it becomes the dominant constraint. The fact that the FPS at 4K Low (70) is dramatically lower than at 1080p Low (191) — a 63.4% reduction — confirms that the GPU's pixel-pushing capacity is the primary barrier at that resolution. The CPU, with 6 cores and 12 threads, has enough multithreaded headroom to feed the GPU at 4K, as evidenced by the fact that the FPS doesn't drop to single digits. The takeaway: this combo is GPU-limited at 4K, CPU-limited at lower resolutions, and the crossover point occurs somewhere between 1440p and 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1080p High is 120 FPS, which is a solid playable frame rate for most displays.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra?

A: At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average FPS drops to 34 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, indicating this resolution/settings combination is too demanding for the GPU.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 1080p Low?

A: At 1080p Low, the combo produces 191 FPS, which is well above what a 144Hz monitor can display, so the CPU is likely the limiting factor because the GPU has plenty of headroom.

Q: What is the best resolution to play at if you want a high refresh rate?

A: At 1080p Medium, the average FPS is 151 FPS with a minimum of 128 FPS, making it the best choice for a 144Hz display. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 99 FPS, which is still playable but not as high.

Q: How does the combo rank among other tested combinations in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 1937 out of 3707 tested combos, which places it in the 52.2nd percentile — just above the median of all tested systems.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 2560x1440?

A: At 1440p, Low averages 126 FPS while Ultra averages 62 FPS, a difference of 64 FPS. This shows a significant performance hit from the Ultra preset, likely due to increased GPU load.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame field places this specific pairing at rank 1937 out of 3707 tested combos. That's a percentile of 52.2%, meaning it sits just above the median of all tested systems. This rank is based on measured FPS data, not synthetic benchmarks, so it reflects real Fivem performance. The rank suggests that while the combo is not a top-tier performer, it's also not a bottom-feeder — it's solidly mid-pack.

To put this in context, the CPU alone has a percentileVsAllCpus of 71, meaning the Ryzen 5 4600G scores higher than 71% of all CPUs in the database. The GPU has a percentileVsAllGpus of 72, so the RX 6700 XT beats 72% of all GPUs. However, the combo rank is only at 52.2%, which is lower than what either component's individual percentile might suggest. This disconnect indicates that in Fivem specifically, the combination of these two components doesn't scale as well as their individual benchmark scores would imply. The CPU is likely a bottleneck in more CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions, while the GPU is fine at mid-range but not at 4K Ultra.

Comparing to the CPU's nearestRivals: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE has an avgScore of 17482, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 5 4600G's avgScore of 17507. The Intel Core 7 150U is 0.6% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is 0.6% higher. So the 4600G is essentially on par with these rivals, all within a 1% delta. Similarly, the GPU's nearestRivals show the RX 6700 XT is nearly identical to the RTX 4070 Mobile (0% delta), 0.5% lower than the RTX 3090, and 1.1% higher than the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. These small deltas indicate that both components are average for their respective classes, but the combo rank of 52.2% suggests the Fivem workload doesn't fully leverage the GPU's strengths.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080 settings:

• Low: average 191 FPS
• Medium: average 151 FPS, min 128, max 173
• High: average 120 FPS
• Ultra: average 93 FPS

2560x1440 settings:

• Low: average 126 FPS
• Medium: average 99 FPS, min 84, max 114
• High: average 79 FPS
• Ultra: average 62 FPS

3840x2160 settings:

• Low: average 70 FPS
• Medium: average 55 FPS, min 47, max 63
• High: average 44 FPS
• Ultra: average 34 FPS

The data is complete for all settings, with min and max FPS only recorded for Medium. The lack of min/max for other settings means that the average FPS is the only comparison point. The progression from 1080p to 4K is very regular: each resolution step (1080p to 1440p to 4K) reduces FPS by a similar factor across all settings. For example, at High, the FPS goes from 120 to 79 to 44, which is roughly a 34% drop per step. At Medium, it's 151 to 99 to 55, a 34% and 45% drop respectively. This regularity suggests that the game's performance is heavily tied to pixel count, and the CPU has enough headroom to prevent unexpected dips.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 4600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. It's based on the Zen 2 (Renoir) architecture, which is a 7nm TSMC process. The CPU has an L3 cache of 8 MB shared, which is relatively small, but the L2 cache is 512 KB per core, and the L1 cache is 64 KB per core. This cache layout is typical for a 4000-series APU, and it means that the CPU is more suited to multithreaded workloads than to single-thread-heavy tasks.

In Fivem, a multiplayer game, the CPU's 12 threads are beneficial because the game needs to handle many simultaneous players, vehicles, and world states. The CPU's benchmark scores show a strong multithreaded performance: the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 13593, and Geekbench multicore is 6637. The single-thread scores are lower, with Cinebench R23 singlecore at 1919 and Geekbench singlecore at 1460. This indicates that the CPU is better at handling the multithreaded aspects of Fivem, which is a common pattern for multiplayer titles that offload simulation to the CPU.

The CPU's percentilVsAllCpus of 71 is respectable, and it's close to its nearestRivals. The 4600G's avgBenchmarkScore of 17507 is within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE. This means that the CPU is not an outstanding performer, but it's not a bottleneck in most cases. In Fivem, the CPU's 12 threads are likely sufficient to keep up with the GPU at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K the GPU becomes the limit, as we saw in the FPS data. The CPU's role is to ensure that the GPU is fed with data, and the fact that 1080p Low yields 191 FPS suggests that the CPU can easily keep up with the GPU at lower resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

The best experience depends on the display's refresh rate. For a 1080p 144Hz display, the Medium preset provides 151 FPS average with a 128 FPS minimum, which is just above the 144Hz threshold. The Ultra preset at 1080p drops to 93 FPS, which is still playable but below the 144Hz refresh rate. High at 1080p gives 120 FPS, which is also good, but Medium offers the best balance of frame rate and visual quality, since the min FPS of 128 ensures a smooth experience even in demanding scenes.

For 1440p, the Low preset gives 126 FPS average, which is good for a 144Hz display, but the Medium preset at 99 FPS is more reasonable if you want better visuals. However, the min FPS of 84 might cause some stutter on a 144Hz monitor. High at 1440p drops to 79 FPS, which is still playable but requires a 75Hz or 100Hz display to fully utilize. Ultra at 1440p is 62 FPS, which is only good for a 60Hz monitor.

For 4K, the results are less encouraging. The Low preset at 70 FPS is the only one that approaches 60 FPS, but the Medium drops to 55 FPS, High to 44 FPS, and Ultra to 34 FPS. The data shows that this combo is not suitable for 4K Ultra, as the GPU is too weak to maintain acceptable frame rates. The best 4K experience is Low settings, which yields 70 FPS, but even that might have dips in heavy multiplayer scenes.

In summary, for a smooth experience, the Medium preset at 1080p is the recommended choice, as it provides the highest average FPS with a min FPS that is still above 60. At 1440p, the Medium preset is a good compromise, but the Low preset is better if you want to maintain a high refresh. At 4K, the Low preset is the only playable option, and the Ultra preset is not recommended.