Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER pairing in Fivem presents a study in contrasting generational strengths. The CPU, a 6-core, 12-thread part from the 2000 series, operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. This Zen-based architecture, built on a 12 nm process, provides a solid foundation for the game’s simulation and entity processing demands. Its benchmark results, such as a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11186 and a single-core score of 1579, indicate a capable processor that handles the game's logic threads efficiently. The data shows that while its single-thread performance is adequate, it is the combination of 6 cores and 12 threads that allows for smooth handling of the complex, multiplayer-driven server-side calculations that Fivem is known for. The CPU's 16 MB of shared L3 cache also helps in keeping frequently accessed data close at hand, reducing latency in a game where real-time responsiveness is critical. The processor holds a percentile rank of 77 against all CPUs, positioning it as a mid-to-upper-tier performer in the broader market, but its age is a factor when paired with a modern GPU.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 5 2600's 6 cores and 12 threads are directly relevant to Fivem's performance profile. Fivem, being a multiplayer modification, has a significant portion of its workload dedicated to network communication and world-state synchronization, which often scales with core count. The CPU's 3.90 GHz boost clock provides the necessary speed for single-threaded game logic, while the additional threads ensure that background tasks do not starve the main game thread. Benchmark results show a Passmark multithread score of 13160 and a Passmark single-thread score of 2239, indicating a balanced performance envelope. In this context, the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at lower resolutions, but its influence becomes more apparent when frame rates are very high. The data suggests that the processor’s performance is sufficient to feed the RTX 4070 SUPER at 1080p and 1440p, but it is the GPU that ultimately determines the maximum frame rate at higher settings. The processor's 65W TDP and dual-channel DDR4 memory support are consistent with a mainstream platform, and the 46.9 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for the game's data streaming needs. Relative to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 2600's average benchmark score of 19616 is remarkably close, with the Intel Core i5-1345U being just 0.4% lower and the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U being 0.6% higher, showing that its computational output remains relevant despite its older architecture.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the comprehensive database of tested configurations, this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER achieves a combo rank of 466 out of 1792 tested combos. This places the pairing in the top 26% of all systems tested for Fivem, a strong showing that underscores the GPU's ability to compensate for the CPU's age. The rank reflects the balance of the system; it outperforms many combinations that pair newer mid-range CPUs with slower GPUs, but it is also outclassed by systems using top-tier current-generation processors. The data indicates that the RTX 4070 SUPER is the dominant component in this pairing, pulling the overall rank upward. A system with a more modern CPU would likely see a higher combo rank, but this specific pairing demonstrates that the Ryzen 5 2600 does not hold the GPU back enough to drop it into the lower percentiles. The performance is sufficient to deliver a high-refresh-rate experience at 1080p and a solid 1440p experience, as evidenced by the measured FPS data. This rank of 466 reflects the RTX 4070 SUPER's raw power and its ability to deliver high frame rates even when paired with a less capable processor.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals a predictable shift in system bottleneck. At 1920x1080, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, as the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls. The performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p is 59 FPS (from 197.3 down to 138.3), a spread that shows the GPU is still handling the extra graphical load, but the frame rates are high enough that CPU limitations begin to emerge. Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's workload increases, and the average frame rates drop across all settings, with the spread between Low and Ultra widening slightly to 77.2 FPS (from 172.4 down to 95.2). This indicates that the GPU is becoming the more significant constraint, though the CPU is still contributing. At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the limiting component. The average frame rate at Ultra settings drops to 51.6 FPS, while Low settings yield 106.3 FPS. The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings shows a drop from 138.3 FPS to 51.6 FPS, a 62.7% reduction in performance. This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the rendering resolution and settings have a direct and massive impact on frame rate. The data clearly shows that the RTX 4070 SUPER is the primary driver of performance at 4K, while the Ryzen 5 2600 is sufficient to maintain high frame rates at lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at the system's performance across a matrix of resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance, with an average of 197.3 FPS on Low settings. This drops to 182.3 FPS on Medium, 163.8 FPS on High, and 138.3 FPS on Ultra. These figures show a consistent and expected decrease in performance as graphical fidelity increases. At 2560x1440, the system still delivers high frame rates, but the impact of resolution is clear. The average FPS on Low is 172.4, which falls to 151.3 on Medium, 119.0 on High, and 95.2 on Ultra. This resolution is the sweet spot for this combo, offering a balance between visual quality and high refresh rates. At 3840x2160, the system's performance is heavily taxed. The average FPS on Low is 106.3, dropping to 81.4 on Medium, 68.1 on High, and 51.6 on Ultra. The data shows that 4K Ultra is a demanding scenario, but the system remains playable, while 4K Low provides a very smooth experience. The scaling from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra shows a performance reduction of 86.7 FPS, highlighting the significant cost of higher resolution. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 54.7 FPS, showing that settings have a profound impact when the GPU is the primary bottleneck.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the clear performance driver in this configuration. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for Fivem's texture and geometry data at any resolution in this test. The GPU's boost clock of 2475 MHz, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, enables high compute throughput. The 7168 shading units and 224 texture mapping units allow for rapid pixel and texture processing, which is directly reflected in the high frame rates observed at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 29995 and its 84th percentile rank against all GPUs confirm its high-end status. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4070 SUPER's average benchmark score of 42576 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (0.2% lower) and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE (0.3% higher), illustrating its position in the upper echelon of graphics cards. In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions and settings. At 1080p, the GPU is often waiting on the CPU, but at 4K Ultra, it is working at full capacity, as evidenced by the 51.6 FPS average. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is a key asset, ensuring that the game does not experience texture pop-in or stuttering due to memory constraints. The data strongly suggests that this GPU is capable of handling Fivem at its highest visual settings, provided the resolution is not excessively high, and it is the component that boosts this pairing's overall performance and combo rank.